dilloduck
Diamond Member
Mr. P said:Because there must be "INTENT"...you lost this one dildo..go chill..
you a referee now Mr p?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Mr. P said:Because there must be "INTENT"...you lost this one dildo..go chill..
Mr. P said:Because there must be "INTENT"...you lost this one dildo..go chill..
Mr. P said:Because there must be "INTENT"...you lost this one dildo..go chill..
I doubt that she gave $$ amount a thought...She did intend to vanish...the ticket was purchased a week ahead of time, under a false name I understand. Now if she was o so smart to do that wouldn't it be logical she would know people would look for her and it would cost $$$..dilloduck said:Did she intend for the community to spend thousnds looking for her? prove it !!
Eightball said:The groom should really re-think getting married to this gal very soon, and really stipulate that his Fiancee' go into some very serious counseling. In fact, the two should probably both do some serious pre-marital counseling co-inciding with her separate counseling. After one year the groom to-be should try to make an assessment, if marriage is still a viable option. She should do the same.
If they opt to go ahead........trim down the size of the wedding so that the bride is not over-whelmed, and go for it.
I do think that instead of criminal charges being files that atleast the bride should have some liability in paying back the city for the rescue efforts performed by both police and fire rescue personel. There was an element of risk for these rescue folks, both volunteer and payed. It would have been sad if there had been some injuries incurred by any of these people while performing the search, and maybe some liability to the bride should be considered there.
Her purchase of a bus ticket 10 days in advance does indicate less than a "spurr of the moment" decision, but some fore-planning.
In your dreams PMr. P said:I doubt that she gave $$ amount a thought...She did intend to vanish...the ticket was purchased a week ahead of time, under a false name I understand. Now if she was o so smart to do that wouldn't it be logical she would know people would look for her and it would cost $$$..
There's your "intent"...
Like I said, ya lost this one...go chill...
Shattered said:Oh, good grief.. Dillo - admit defeat on this one - you can't logically win it. The only way you can win is if everyone just gives up, and leaves the thread due to the sheer stupidity of its progression, just like I'm about to do.
Later.![]()
True but...you're not charged with killing someone cuz you were speeding..You're most likely charged with vehicular homicide, due to a lack of control required of you when operating a vehicle.GotZoom said:Not necessarily. If you speed but don't mean to run someone over, but do and they die, trust me - you will be charged because of the death.
Mr. P said:True but...you're not charged with killing someone cuz you were speeding..You're most likely charged with vehicular homicide, due to a lack of control required of you when operating a vehicle.
This goes beyond intent...to negligence..When issued a licence you are bound to adhere to the laws while operating a vehicle..intent is understood..if you fail it can be considered negligence.
Mr. P said:True but...you're not charged with killing someone cuz you were speeding..You're most likely charged with vehicular homicide, due to a lack of control required of you when operating a vehicle.
This goes beyond intent...to negligence..When issued a licence you are bound to adhere to the laws while operating a vehicle..intent is understood..if you fail it can be considered negligence.
dilloduck said:well speeding is stupid so lets charge them for all the bucks it cost for the police to deal with the wreck too!
-=d=- said:Why are some ppl having a problem with the fact that due to one's "Negligence" (to leave a note, maybe?) the community was out Hundreds? of thousands of dollars?
That's a crime, IMO...to the extent some portion should be levied against the perp.
dilloduck said:Example---If I just wanna disappear and have people leave me the hell alone, there is no law telling me I have to leave a note. Why in the hell should i pay for people who DECIDED BY THEMSELVES to look for me?
-=d=- said:But there is community responsibility. If people spent money searching for you, because you neglected to have the balls to TELL somebody prior to your leaving, I'd have no problems passing along the bill for the search.
dilloduck said:What does balls have to do with it???? NOTHING I have the right to "disappear" anytime I want. Are you telling me I don't ?
-=d=- said:Again - I'm saying if you DO disappear, from what looks outwardly to be the result of foul play, you deserve to get billed.
simple.![]()