Minnesota Sues Trump Administration For Access To Evidence In Alex Pretti, Renee Good Killings.

0311

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2022
Messages
14,190
Reaction score
13,254
Points
2,288
Location
My Happyi Place
The two Minnesota residents were killed by federal agents during the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown earlier this year.


The state of Minnesota sued the Trump administration on Tuesday for access to investigation materials regarding the killings of Alex Pretti and Renee Good, two Minnesota residents who were shot by federal agents during the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown earlier this year.

Federal and state authorities have sparred over information in the aftermath of the shootings, which took place amidst a massive immigration enforcement surge in Minneapolis. Local and state investigators alleged in the lawsuit that they have been stonewalled by federal officials.

The state is also seeking information on a third, non-fatal shooting in the state.

These two people were murdered by I.C.E. Thugs, all the administration is protecting killers. Nothing more, nothing less.
 
These grandstanding lawsuits and rogue judge decrees need to be wholly disregarded and in fact injunctions issued prohibiting more
 
Last edited:
The two Minnesota residents were killed by federal agents during the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown earlier this year.


The state of Minnesota sued the Trump administration on Tuesday for access to investigation materials regarding the killings of Alex Pretti and Renee Good, two Minnesota residents who were shot by federal agents during the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown earlier this year.

Federal and state authorities have sparred over information in the aftermath of the shootings, which took place amidst a massive immigration enforcement surge in Minneapolis. Local and state investigators alleged in the lawsuit that they have been stonewalled by federal officials.

The state is also seeking information on a third, non-fatal shooting in the state.

These two people were murdered by I.C.E. Thugs, all the administration is protecting killers. Nothing more, nothing less.
Send those fools EVERY VIDEO that was shot by EVERY protestor on the street. We don't want the left suppressing any evidence. MN is the home of FRAUD. Good and Pretti were little more than base thugs violently attacking legal law enforcement officers in the performance of their lawful duties. They FAFO. Nothing more, nothing less.
 
In the case of the Renee Good incident, the video shows an ICE agent step up to her driver side door, grab it and "demand" that she step out. That constitutes "being detained." Once law enforcement (federal, state, or local) tell you to remain, you MUST comply. She did not. She tried to flee by turning and driving away and in the process, she struck the officer that was in front of her, injuring his hip. As that constituted battery on a federal law enforcement officer, he drew his weapon and fired.
1. She was in the wrong by disobeying the order.
2. She was in the wrong by driving away.
3. She was wrong in hitting the officer.
Personally, I feel that she figured that if she drove off, she would have a good laugh over what she did and that she most likely didn't realize that she would hit the officer. But, whether she meant it or not, she did hit him, injuring his hip. As for the officer, he just acted on training instinct.
If it had been me, being untrained in such matters, I wouldn't have stood in front of the car and after being injured, would have memorized that license plate number (if possible) then they could go to her home with a warrant, break down her door and drag her off to federal confinement.
 
In the case of the Renee Good incident, the video shows an ICE agent step up to her driver side door, grab it and "demand" that she step out. That constitutes "being detained." Once law enforcement (federal, state, or local) tell you to remain, you MUST comply. She did not. She tried to flee by turning and driving away and in the process, she struck the officer that was in front of her, injuring his hip. As that constituted battery on a federal law enforcement officer, he drew his weapon and fired.
1. She was in the wrong by disobeying the order.
2. She was in the wrong by driving away.
3. She was wrong in hitting the officer.
Personally, I feel that she figured that if she drove off, she would have a good laugh over what she did and that she most likely didn't realize that she would hit the officer. But, whether she meant it or not, she did hit him, injuring his hip. As for the officer, he just acted on training instinct.
If it had been me, being untrained in such matters, I wouldn't have stood in front of the car and after being injured, would have memorized that license plate number (if possible) then they could go to her home with a warrant, break down her door and drag her off to federal confinement.

She was attempting to drive away, she was NOT a threat. She was killed in cold blood.
 
She was attempting to drive away, she was NOT a threat. She was killed in cold blood.
She struck the agent with her car. What she was trying to do is irrelevant. Do you think you have the right to run someone over while you are 'attempting to get to McD's for your egg mcmuffin?' Or while you are attempting to evade police? SMH
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom