Minnesota Freedom Fund that Kamala Harris supports & promoted has been bailing out VIOLENT criminals.


By our board standards I guess this means she supports domestic abuse no? Of the 6 men bailed out after domestic violence only one did not have previous domestic violence convictions. Two of the men strangled their victims.

Wonder if the media will question Kamala about her support for this group and their support for men who beat women?


Do we really need a radical of her nature one mental breakdown away from the office of the Presidency.....
You seem not to understand the innocent until proven guilty aspect of out justice system.
DNC threw that out a long time ago...........spare me the Drama

And?

I never said anything supporting the DNC did I?
And yet the DNC funding legal for violent criminals is the point of the op.........kinda implied now isn't it......................Did she join the the RNC without me noticing it.......
What about innocent until proven guilty do you not understand?

Accused of a crime does not equal convicted of a crime.

And a general comment about our Constitutional rights is not an endorsement of any political party.

In case you haven't noticed, neither party gives 2 shits about the constitution
LOL

The Judge decides BAIL not you dummy............those accused with sufficient evidence will get no bail.........so they can't flee or kill again..........

Their rights don't end where ours begin................Kinda like saying Charles Manson should have never been held til trial

Sell your ISM somewhere else.

Yes I can see why you dislike Constitutionalism
How is that a violation...........aka ........go into a murder scene ........police find a guy holding a bloody knife at the scene........should the judge let him go.....

lmao..........The Judge decides if he is a risk to flee or kill again.........he still gets a trial.
Cherry picking.

So tell me do you honestly think the hundreds of thousands of people in prison right now who have not been convicted of any crime are all there because they murdered someone?
I'm telling you how the system works..........and letting go a suspected murderer or rapist pending trial is stupid.......

That is up to a judge..............not me or you......and that is the LAW.........if the judge fucks up then time to get rid of him via impeachment.

now show me the judges you want impeached........other than Kav.......lmao
And I am telling you that is how it is supposed to work but as is often the case reality is a far cry from the ideal

The fact is there are hundreds of thousands of people in jail right now who have not been convicted of any crime and many of them will be there for long periods of time , even years, before they see a trial
And............hire more judges then..........There is no perfect system...........some shit will happen.......but it is still a judgement call on bail...........and done so to stop them from escaping justice or trial.............that is up to the judge............if you have a problem then you need to point out the judges who need to be impeached.

SO you really don't give a shit what's wrong with our so called justice system do you?

And the eighth amendment says excessive bail shall not be required.

So the fact is all these people who are in jail awaiting trial and cannot afford bail have had excessive bails put upon them.

And you don't know the name and record of every judge in the country do you?

I am commenting on the system and you want to cherry pick individual cases.
LOL

individual cases....kinda the point moron.........sorry a guy sticking a fork into a stomach.........aka.....manson doesn't compare to a kid stealing a candy bar..

One you don't release......other you call dad and tell him to bring his belt.
Tell you what then you look up the cases for the over 500,000 people in jail right now that have not been convicted of any crime and tell me why they should be held in prison even though they have not been convicted
 

By our board standards I guess this means she supports domestic abuse no? Of the 6 men bailed out after domestic violence only one did not have previous domestic violence convictions. Two of the men strangled their victims.

Wonder if the media will question Kamala about her support for this group and their support for men who beat women?


Do we really need a radical of her nature one mental breakdown away from the office of the Presidency.....
You seem not to understand the innocent until proven guilty aspect of out justice system.
DNC threw that out a long time ago...........spare me the Drama

And?

I never said anything supporting the DNC did I?
And yet the DNC funding legal for violent criminals is the point of the op.........kinda implied now isn't it......................Did she join the the RNC without me noticing it.......
What about innocent until proven guilty do you not understand?

Accused of a crime does not equal convicted of a crime.

And a general comment about our Constitutional rights is not an endorsement of any political party.

In case you haven't noticed, neither party gives 2 shits about the constitution
LOL

The Judge decides BAIL not you dummy............those accused with sufficient evidence will get no bail.........so they can't flee or kill again..........

Their rights don't end where ours begin................Kinda like saying Charles Manson should have never been held til trial

Sell your ISM somewhere else.

Yes I can see why you dislike Constitutionalism
How is that a violation...........aka ........go into a murder scene ........police find a guy holding a bloody knife at the scene........should the judge let him go.....

lmao..........The Judge decides if he is a risk to flee or kill again.........he still gets a trial.
Cherry picking.

So tell me do you honestly think the hundreds of thousands of people in prison right now who have not been convicted of any crime are all there because they murdered someone?
I'm telling you how the system works..........and letting go a suspected murderer or rapist pending trial is stupid.......

That is up to a judge..............not me or you......and that is the LAW.........if the judge fucks up then time to get rid of him via impeachment.

now show me the judges you want impeached........other than Kav.......lmao
And I am telling you that is how it is supposed to work but as is often the case reality is a far cry from the ideal

The fact is there are hundreds of thousands of people in jail right now who have not been convicted of any crime and many of them will be there for long periods of time , even years, before they see a trial
And............hire more judges then..........There is no perfect system...........some shit will happen.......but it is still a judgement call on bail...........and done so to stop them from escaping justice or trial.............that is up to the judge............if you have a problem then you need to point out the judges who need to be impeached.

SO you really don't give a shit what's wrong with our so called justice system do you?

And the eighth amendment says excessive bail shall not be required.

So the fact is all these people who are in jail awaiting trial and cannot afford bail have had excessive bails put upon them.

And you don't know the name and record of every judge in the country do you?

I am commenting on the system and you want to cherry pick individual cases.
LOL

individual cases....kinda the point moron.........sorry a guy sticking a fork into a stomach.........aka.....manson doesn't compare to a kid stealing a candy bar..

One you don't release......other you call dad and tell him to bring his belt.
Tell you what then you look up the cases for the over 500,000 people in jail right now that have not been convicted of any crime and tell me why they should be held in prison even though they have not been convicted

How about you tell me what in the hell has this to do with Kamala paying the bail of criminals first?

If the bail hill is what you want to die on, make your own thread.
 

By our board standards I guess this means she supports domestic abuse no? Of the 6 men bailed out after domestic violence only one did not have previous domestic violence convictions. Two of the men strangled their victims.

Wonder if the media will question Kamala about her support for this group and their support for men who beat women?


Do we really need a radical of her nature one mental breakdown away from the office of the Presidency.....
You seem not to understand the innocent until proven guilty aspect of out justice system.
OOOOOO!!!!!!!!
.........but what about the police????!!!!!!! you people burn/loot/murder not only BEFORE the investigation, but when they are found INNOCENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
..look at Taylor's parents!!!! they don't accept the fair/legal verdict!!!!!
etc
you people?

I never burned looted or rioted in my life.

And the OP did not specify that this was solely about rioters, looters and arsonists did it?

But I see you people are too narrow monded to discuss larger issues and therefore have to dumb it all down to somethuing you can wrap your tiny minds around
 

By our board standards I guess this means she supports domestic abuse no? Of the 6 men bailed out after domestic violence only one did not have previous domestic violence convictions. Two of the men strangled their victims.

Wonder if the media will question Kamala about her support for this group and their support for men who beat women?


Do we really need a radical of her nature one mental breakdown away from the office of the Presidency.....
You seem not to understand the innocent until proven guilty aspect of out justice system.
DNC threw that out a long time ago...........spare me the Drama

And?

I never said anything supporting the DNC did I?
And yet the DNC funding legal for violent criminals is the point of the op.........kinda implied now isn't it......................Did she join the the RNC without me noticing it.......
What about innocent until proven guilty do you not understand?

Accused of a crime does not equal convicted of a crime.

And a general comment about our Constitutional rights is not an endorsement of any political party.

In case you haven't noticed, neither party gives 2 shits about the constitution
LOL

The Judge decides BAIL not you dummy............those accused with sufficient evidence will get no bail.........so they can't flee or kill again..........

Their rights don't end where ours begin................Kinda like saying Charles Manson should have never been held til trial

Sell your ISM somewhere else.

Yes I can see why you dislike Constitutionalism
How is that a violation...........aka ........go into a murder scene ........police find a guy holding a bloody knife at the scene........should the judge let him go.....

lmao..........The Judge decides if he is a risk to flee or kill again.........he still gets a trial.
Cherry picking.

So tell me do you honestly think the hundreds of thousands of people in prison right now who have not been convicted of any crime are all there because they murdered someone?
I'm telling you how the system works..........and letting go a suspected murderer or rapist pending trial is stupid.......

That is up to a judge..............not me or you......and that is the LAW.........if the judge fucks up then time to get rid of him via impeachment.

now show me the judges you want impeached........other than Kav.......lmao
And I am telling you that is how it is supposed to work but as is often the case reality is a far cry from the ideal

The fact is there are hundreds of thousands of people in jail right now who have not been convicted of any crime and many of them will be there for long periods of time , even years, before they see a trial
And............hire more judges then..........There is no perfect system...........some shit will happen.......but it is still a judgement call on bail...........and done so to stop them from escaping justice or trial.............that is up to the judge............if you have a problem then you need to point out the judges who need to be impeached.

SO you really don't give a shit what's wrong with our so called justice system do you?

And the eighth amendment says excessive bail shall not be required.

So the fact is all these people who are in jail awaiting trial and cannot afford bail have had excessive bails put upon them.

And you don't know the name and record of every judge in the country do you?

I am commenting on the system and you want to cherry pick individual cases.
LOL

individual cases....kinda the point moron.........sorry a guy sticking a fork into a stomach.........aka.....manson doesn't compare to a kid stealing a candy bar..

One you don't release......other you call dad and tell him to bring his belt.
Tell you what then you look up the cases for the over 500,000 people in jail right now that have not been convicted of any crime and tell me why they should be held in prison even though they have not been convicted
.....MOST would not be there if there wasn't mucho evidence against them
 

By our board standards I guess this means she supports domestic abuse no? Of the 6 men bailed out after domestic violence only one did not have previous domestic violence convictions. Two of the men strangled their victims.

Wonder if the media will question Kamala about her support for this group and their support for men who beat women?


Do we really need a radical of her nature one mental breakdown away from the office of the Presidency.....
You seem not to understand the innocent until proven guilty aspect of out justice system.
DNC threw that out a long time ago...........spare me the Drama

And?

I never said anything supporting the DNC did I?
And yet the DNC funding legal for violent criminals is the point of the op.........kinda implied now isn't it......................Did she join the the RNC without me noticing it.......
What about innocent until proven guilty do you not understand?

Accused of a crime does not equal convicted of a crime.

And a general comment about our Constitutional rights is not an endorsement of any political party.

In case you haven't noticed, neither party gives 2 shits about the constitution
LOL

The Judge decides BAIL not you dummy............those accused with sufficient evidence will get no bail.........so they can't flee or kill again..........

Their rights don't end where ours begin................Kinda like saying Charles Manson should have never been held til trial

Sell your ISM somewhere else.

Yes I can see why you dislike Constitutionalism
How is that a violation...........aka ........go into a murder scene ........police find a guy holding a bloody knife at the scene........should the judge let him go.....

lmao..........The Judge decides if he is a risk to flee or kill again.........he still gets a trial.
Cherry picking.

So tell me do you honestly think the hundreds of thousands of people in prison right now who have not been convicted of any crime are all there because they murdered someone?
I'm telling you how the system works..........and letting go a suspected murderer or rapist pending trial is stupid.......

That is up to a judge..............not me or you......and that is the LAW.........if the judge fucks up then time to get rid of him via impeachment.

now show me the judges you want impeached........other than Kav.......lmao
And I am telling you that is how it is supposed to work but as is often the case reality is a far cry from the ideal

The fact is there are hundreds of thousands of people in jail right now who have not been convicted of any crime and many of them will be there for long periods of time , even years, before they see a trial
And............hire more judges then..........There is no perfect system...........some shit will happen.......but it is still a judgement call on bail...........and done so to stop them from escaping justice or trial.............that is up to the judge............if you have a problem then you need to point out the judges who need to be impeached.

SO you really don't give a shit what's wrong with our so called justice system do you?

And the eighth amendment says excessive bail shall not be required.

So the fact is all these people who are in jail awaiting trial and cannot afford bail have had excessive bails put upon them.

And you don't know the name and record of every judge in the country do you?

I am commenting on the system and you want to cherry pick individual cases.
LOL

individual cases....kinda the point moron.........sorry a guy sticking a fork into a stomach.........aka.....manson doesn't compare to a kid stealing a candy bar..

One you don't release......other you call dad and tell him to bring his belt.
Tell you what then you look up the cases for the over 500,000 people in jail right now that have not been convicted of any crime and tell me why they should be held in prison even though they have not been convicted

How about you tell me what in the hell as this to do with Kamala paying the bail of criminals first?

If the bail hill is what you want to die on, make your own thread.
Nothing. He clearly just wants to protect her by changing the subject.

People who support no bail releases are really dumb. All facets of crime will increase.
 

By our board standards I guess this means she supports domestic abuse no? Of the 6 men bailed out after domestic violence only one did not have previous domestic violence convictions. Two of the men strangled their victims.

Wonder if the media will question Kamala about her support for this group and their support for men who beat women?


Do we really need a radical of her nature one mental breakdown away from the office of the Presidency.....
You seem not to understand the innocent until proven guilty aspect of out justice system.
DNC threw that out a long time ago...........spare me the Drama

And?

I never said anything supporting the DNC did I?
And yet the DNC funding legal for violent criminals is the point of the op.........kinda implied now isn't it......................Did she join the the RNC without me noticing it.......
What about innocent until proven guilty do you not understand?

Accused of a crime does not equal convicted of a crime.

And a general comment about our Constitutional rights is not an endorsement of any political party.

In case you haven't noticed, neither party gives 2 shits about the constitution
LOL

The Judge decides BAIL not you dummy............those accused with sufficient evidence will get no bail.........so they can't flee or kill again..........

Their rights don't end where ours begin................Kinda like saying Charles Manson should have never been held til trial

Sell your ISM somewhere else.

Yes I can see why you dislike Constitutionalism
How is that a violation...........aka ........go into a murder scene ........police find a guy holding a bloody knife at the scene........should the judge let him go.....

lmao..........The Judge decides if he is a risk to flee or kill again.........he still gets a trial.
Cherry picking.

So tell me do you honestly think the hundreds of thousands of people in prison right now who have not been convicted of any crime are all there because they murdered someone?
I'm telling you how the system works..........and letting go a suspected murderer or rapist pending trial is stupid.......

That is up to a judge..............not me or you......and that is the LAW.........if the judge fucks up then time to get rid of him via impeachment.

now show me the judges you want impeached........other than Kav.......lmao
And I am telling you that is how it is supposed to work but as is often the case reality is a far cry from the ideal

The fact is there are hundreds of thousands of people in jail right now who have not been convicted of any crime and many of them will be there for long periods of time , even years, before they see a trial

For the most part, everyone sitting in jail waiting a trail DESERVES to be there.
I don't understand how people scream for gun control (to supposedly make society safer) then in the same breath
scream to release CRIMINALS back onto the streets. Kinda obliterates their gun control argument if you ask me.
Contrary to popular Leftist belief, cops don't often arrest innocent people (YES, there are exceptions, but they are just that)

Could be worse.....
In China, you get a speedy judgment......then a swift bullet to the back of the head. Less than a month.
Seems the left would prefer this type of justice system here. You know, that "transformation" thingy

The fact that you think that the cops are infallible and never arrest people they shouldn't tells me you have divorced yourself from reality

That fact that I never said that, you did, tells us all something else entirely
Why would you make such an erroneous ASSumption?

Most cops do not go around arresting just anybody. If you disagree with that you are paranoid and delusional.
 

By our board standards I guess this means she supports domestic abuse no? Of the 6 men bailed out after domestic violence only one did not have previous domestic violence convictions. Two of the men strangled their victims.

Wonder if the media will question Kamala about her support for this group and their support for men who beat women?


Do we really need a radical of her nature one mental breakdown away from the office of the Presidency.....
You seem not to understand the innocent until proven guilty aspect of out justice system.
DNC threw that out a long time ago...........spare me the Drama

And?

I never said anything supporting the DNC did I?
And yet the DNC funding legal for violent criminals is the point of the op.........kinda implied now isn't it......................Did she join the the RNC without me noticing it.......
What about innocent until proven guilty do you not understand?

Accused of a crime does not equal convicted of a crime.

And a general comment about our Constitutional rights is not an endorsement of any political party.

In case you haven't noticed, neither party gives 2 shits about the constitution
LOL

The Judge decides BAIL not you dummy............those accused with sufficient evidence will get no bail.........so they can't flee or kill again..........

Their rights don't end where ours begin................Kinda like saying Charles Manson should have never been held til trial

Sell your ISM somewhere else.

Yes I can see why you dislike Constitutionalism
How is that a violation...........aka ........go into a murder scene ........police find a guy holding a bloody knife at the scene........should the judge let him go.....

lmao..........The Judge decides if he is a risk to flee or kill again.........he still gets a trial.
Cherry picking.

So tell me do you honestly think the hundreds of thousands of people in prison right now who have not been convicted of any crime are all there because they murdered someone?
I'm telling you how the system works..........and letting go a suspected murderer or rapist pending trial is stupid.......

That is up to a judge..............not me or you......and that is the LAW.........if the judge fucks up then time to get rid of him via impeachment.

now show me the judges you want impeached........other than Kav.......lmao
And I am telling you that is how it is supposed to work but as is often the case reality is a far cry from the ideal

The fact is there are hundreds of thousands of people in jail right now who have not been convicted of any crime and many of them will be there for long periods of time , even years, before they see a trial
And............hire more judges then..........There is no perfect system...........some shit will happen.......but it is still a judgement call on bail...........and done so to stop them from escaping justice or trial.............that is up to the judge............if you have a problem then you need to point out the judges who need to be impeached.

SO you really don't give a shit what's wrong with our so called justice system do you?

And the eighth amendment says excessive bail shall not be required.

So the fact is all these people who are in jail awaiting trial and cannot afford bail have had excessive bails put upon them.

And you don't know the name and record of every judge in the country do you?

I am commenting on the system and you want to cherry pick individual cases.
LOL

individual cases....kinda the point moron.........sorry a guy sticking a fork into a stomach.........aka.....manson doesn't compare to a kid stealing a candy bar..

One you don't release......other you call dad and tell him to bring his belt.
Tell you what then you look up the cases for the over 500,000 people in jail right now that have not been convicted of any crime and tell me why they should be held in prison even though they have not been convicted
Yawn..........sorry......the system holds potential violent criminals...........that your hero wants to let out before trial............no dice............
1601120346826.png
 

By our board standards I guess this means she supports domestic abuse no? Of the 6 men bailed out after domestic violence only one did not have previous domestic violence convictions. Two of the men strangled their victims.

Wonder if the media will question Kamala about her support for this group and their support for men who beat women?


Do we really need a radical of her nature one mental breakdown away from the office of the Presidency.....
You seem not to understand the innocent until proven guilty aspect of out justice system.
OOOOOO!!!!!!!!
.........but what about the police????!!!!!!! you people burn/loot/murder not only BEFORE the investigation, but when they are found INNOCENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
..look at Taylor's parents!!!! they don't accept the fair/legal verdict!!!!!
etc
you people?

I never burned looted or rioted in my life.

And the OP did not specify that this was solely about rioters, looters and arsonists did it?

But I see you people are too narrow monded to discuss larger issues and therefore have to dumb it all down to somethuing you can wrap your tiny minds around
.....hahahhahahahah--you fkd up!!! that's an air tight post....NOW you complain about guilty before innocent---but that's what the blacksBLM/Dems/etc have been doing for YEARS-----AND--and after they have been found innocent, they STILL try to find them guilty!!!!!!
 

By our board standards I guess this means she supports domestic abuse no? Of the 6 men bailed out after domestic violence only one did not have previous domestic violence convictions. Two of the men strangled their victims.

Wonder if the media will question Kamala about her support for this group and their support for men who beat women?


Do we really need a radical of her nature one mental breakdown away from the office of the Presidency.....
You seem not to understand the innocent until proven guilty aspect of out justice system.
OOOOOO!!!!!!!!
.........but what about the police????!!!!!!! you people burn/loot/murder not only BEFORE the investigation, but when they are found INNOCENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
..look at Taylor's parents!!!! they don't accept the fair/legal verdict!!!!!
etc
you people?

I never burned looted or rioted in my life.

And the OP did not specify that this was solely about rioters, looters and arsonists did it?

But I see you people are too narrow monded to discuss larger issues and therefore have to dumb it all down to somethuing you can wrap your tiny minds around
This thread is about Kamalas support of bailing out VIOLENT MEN.

If you wanna discuss "larger issues" go start your own fucking thread.
 

By our board standards I guess this means she supports domestic abuse no? Of the 6 men bailed out after domestic violence only one did not have previous domestic violence convictions. Two of the men strangled their victims.

Wonder if the media will question Kamala about her support for this group and their support for men who beat women?


Do we really need a radical of her nature one mental breakdown away from the office of the Presidency.....
You seem not to understand the innocent until proven guilty aspect of out justice system.
DNC threw that out a long time ago...........spare me the Drama

And?

I never said anything supporting the DNC did I?
And yet the DNC funding legal for violent criminals is the point of the op.........kinda implied now isn't it......................Did she join the the RNC without me noticing it.......
What about innocent until proven guilty do you not understand?

Accused of a crime does not equal convicted of a crime.

And a general comment about our Constitutional rights is not an endorsement of any political party.

In case you haven't noticed, neither party gives 2 shits about the constitution
LOL

The Judge decides BAIL not you dummy............those accused with sufficient evidence will get no bail.........so they can't flee or kill again..........

Their rights don't end where ours begin................Kinda like saying Charles Manson should have never been held til trial

Sell your ISM somewhere else.

Yes I can see why you dislike Constitutionalism
How is that a violation...........aka ........go into a murder scene ........police find a guy holding a bloody knife at the scene........should the judge let him go.....

lmao..........The Judge decides if he is a risk to flee or kill again.........he still gets a trial.
Cherry picking.

So tell me do you honestly think the hundreds of thousands of people in prison right now who have not been convicted of any crime are all there because they murdered someone?
I'm telling you how the system works..........and letting go a suspected murderer or rapist pending trial is stupid.......

That is up to a judge..............not me or you......and that is the LAW.........if the judge fucks up then time to get rid of him via impeachment.

now show me the judges you want impeached........other than Kav.......lmao
And I am telling you that is how it is supposed to work but as is often the case reality is a far cry from the ideal

The fact is there are hundreds of thousands of people in jail right now who have not been convicted of any crime and many of them will be there for long periods of time , even years, before they see a trial
And............hire more judges then..........There is no perfect system...........some shit will happen.......but it is still a judgement call on bail...........and done so to stop them from escaping justice or trial.............that is up to the judge............if you have a problem then you need to point out the judges who need to be impeached.

SO you really don't give a shit what's wrong with our so called justice system do you?

And the eighth amendment says excessive bail shall not be required.

So the fact is all these people who are in jail awaiting trial and cannot afford bail have had excessive bails put upon them.

And you don't know the name and record of every judge in the country do you?

I am commenting on the system and you want to cherry pick individual cases.
LOL

individual cases....kinda the point moron.........sorry a guy sticking a fork into a stomach.........aka.....manson doesn't compare to a kid stealing a candy bar..

One you don't release......other you call dad and tell him to bring his belt.
Tell you what then you look up the cases for the over 500,000 people in jail right now that have not been convicted of any crime and tell me why they should be held in prison even though they have not been convicted

How about you tell me what in the hell as this to do with Kamala paying the bail of criminals first?

If the bail hill is what you want to die on, make your own thread.
The point that sailed over you blunt little head is that the bail is for people who have not been convicted of any crime
 

By our board standards I guess this means she supports domestic abuse no? Of the 6 men bailed out after domestic violence only one did not have previous domestic violence convictions. Two of the men strangled their victims.

Wonder if the media will question Kamala about her support for this group and their support for men who beat women?


Do we really need a radical of her nature one mental breakdown away from the office of the Presidency.....
You seem not to understand the innocent until proven guilty aspect of out justice system.
OOOOOO!!!!!!!!
.........but what about the police????!!!!!!! you people burn/loot/murder not only BEFORE the investigation, but when they are found INNOCENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
..look at Taylor's parents!!!! they don't accept the fair/legal verdict!!!!!
etc
you people?

I never burned looted or rioted in my life.

And the OP did not specify that this was solely about rioters, looters and arsonists did it?

But I see you people are too narrow monded to discuss larger issues and therefore have to dumb it all down to somethuing you can wrap your tiny minds around
.....hahahhahahahah--you fkd up!!! that's an air tight post....NOW you complain about guilty before innocent---but that's what the blacksBLM/Dems/etc have been doing for YEARS-----AND--and after they have been found innocent, they STILL try to find them guilty!!!!!!
And that incomprehensible post has nothing to do with the OP

And I am not comlaiig I am stating a fact that hundreds of thousands of people are in prison despite not being convicted of any crimes
 

By our board standards I guess this means she supports domestic abuse no? Of the 6 men bailed out after domestic violence only one did not have previous domestic violence convictions. Two of the men strangled their victims.

Wonder if the media will question Kamala about her support for this group and their support for men who beat women?


Do we really need a radical of her nature one mental breakdown away from the office of the Presidency.....
You seem not to understand the innocent until proven guilty aspect of out justice system.
DNC threw that out a long time ago...........spare me the Drama

And?

I never said anything supporting the DNC did I?
And yet the DNC funding legal for violent criminals is the point of the op.........kinda implied now isn't it......................Did she join the the RNC without me noticing it.......
What about innocent until proven guilty do you not understand?

Accused of a crime does not equal convicted of a crime.

And a general comment about our Constitutional rights is not an endorsement of any political party.

In case you haven't noticed, neither party gives 2 shits about the constitution
LOL

The Judge decides BAIL not you dummy............those accused with sufficient evidence will get no bail.........so they can't flee or kill again..........

Their rights don't end where ours begin................Kinda like saying Charles Manson should have never been held til trial

Sell your ISM somewhere else.

Yes I can see why you dislike Constitutionalism
How is that a violation...........aka ........go into a murder scene ........police find a guy holding a bloody knife at the scene........should the judge let him go.....

lmao..........The Judge decides if he is a risk to flee or kill again.........he still gets a trial.
Cherry picking.

So tell me do you honestly think the hundreds of thousands of people in prison right now who have not been convicted of any crime are all there because they murdered someone?
I'm telling you how the system works..........and letting go a suspected murderer or rapist pending trial is stupid.......

That is up to a judge..............not me or you......and that is the LAW.........if the judge fucks up then time to get rid of him via impeachment.

now show me the judges you want impeached........other than Kav.......lmao
And I am telling you that is how it is supposed to work but as is often the case reality is a far cry from the ideal

The fact is there are hundreds of thousands of people in jail right now who have not been convicted of any crime and many of them will be there for long periods of time , even years, before they see a trial
And............hire more judges then..........There is no perfect system...........some shit will happen.......but it is still a judgement call on bail...........and done so to stop them from escaping justice or trial.............that is up to the judge............if you have a problem then you need to point out the judges who need to be impeached.

SO you really don't give a shit what's wrong with our so called justice system do you?

And the eighth amendment says excessive bail shall not be required.

So the fact is all these people who are in jail awaiting trial and cannot afford bail have had excessive bails put upon them.

And you don't know the name and record of every judge in the country do you?

I am commenting on the system and you want to cherry pick individual cases.
LOL

individual cases....kinda the point moron.........sorry a guy sticking a fork into a stomach.........aka.....manson doesn't compare to a kid stealing a candy bar..

One you don't release......other you call dad and tell him to bring his belt.
Tell you what then you look up the cases for the over 500,000 people in jail right now that have not been convicted of any crime and tell me why they should be held in prison even though they have not been convicted

How about you tell me what in the hell as this to do with Kamala paying the bail of criminals first?

If the bail hill is what you want to die on, make your own thread.
The point that sailed over you blunt little head is that the bail is for people who have not been convicted of any crime
Harris is not concerned about innocent people --but like most blacks/etc, she's obsessed with RACE!!!!!!!!!
''''' as it seeks to address a system that disproportionately incarcerates Black people and people of color.''''
 

By our board standards I guess this means she supports domestic abuse no? Of the 6 men bailed out after domestic violence only one did not have previous domestic violence convictions. Two of the men strangled their victims.

Wonder if the media will question Kamala about her support for this group and their support for men who beat women?


Do we really need a radical of her nature one mental breakdown away from the office of the Presidency.....
You seem not to understand the innocent until proven guilty aspect of out justice system.
OOOOOO!!!!!!!!
.........but what about the police????!!!!!!! you people burn/loot/murder not only BEFORE the investigation, but when they are found INNOCENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
..look at Taylor's parents!!!! they don't accept the fair/legal verdict!!!!!
etc
you people?

I never burned looted or rioted in my life.

And the OP did not specify that this was solely about rioters, looters and arsonists did it?

But I see you people are too narrow monded to discuss larger issues and therefore have to dumb it all down to somethuing you can wrap your tiny minds around

The OP did specify that it was talking about criminals. And of course, it is rather implicit that we are talking about the BLM gang.

If you want to discuss some other issue, there is a create thread button for that. How you masquerade your attempted derailing of the thread as being versed in "big topics" is laughable. Before having illusions of grandeur how about being versed in the forum rules.
 

By our board standards I guess this means she supports domestic abuse no? Of the 6 men bailed out after domestic violence only one did not have previous domestic violence convictions. Two of the men strangled their victims.

Wonder if the media will question Kamala about her support for this group and their support for men who beat women?


Do we really need a radical of her nature one mental breakdown away from the office of the Presidency.....
You seem not to understand the innocent until proven guilty aspect of out justice system.
DNC threw that out a long time ago...........spare me the Drama

And?

I never said anything supporting the DNC did I?
And yet the DNC funding legal for violent criminals is the point of the op.........kinda implied now isn't it......................Did she join the the RNC without me noticing it.......
What about innocent until proven guilty do you not understand?

Accused of a crime does not equal convicted of a crime.

And a general comment about our Constitutional rights is not an endorsement of any political party.

In case you haven't noticed, neither party gives 2 shits about the constitution
LOL

The Judge decides BAIL not you dummy............those accused with sufficient evidence will get no bail.........so they can't flee or kill again..........

Their rights don't end where ours begin................Kinda like saying Charles Manson should have never been held til trial

Sell your ISM somewhere else.

Yes I can see why you dislike Constitutionalism
How is that a violation...........aka ........go into a murder scene ........police find a guy holding a bloody knife at the scene........should the judge let him go.....

lmao..........The Judge decides if he is a risk to flee or kill again.........he still gets a trial.
Cherry picking.

So tell me do you honestly think the hundreds of thousands of people in prison right now who have not been convicted of any crime are all there because they murdered someone?
I'm telling you how the system works..........and letting go a suspected murderer or rapist pending trial is stupid.......

That is up to a judge..............not me or you......and that is the LAW.........if the judge fucks up then time to get rid of him via impeachment.

now show me the judges you want impeached........other than Kav.......lmao
And I am telling you that is how it is supposed to work but as is often the case reality is a far cry from the ideal

The fact is there are hundreds of thousands of people in jail right now who have not been convicted of any crime and many of them will be there for long periods of time , even years, before they see a trial
And............hire more judges then..........There is no perfect system...........some shit will happen.......but it is still a judgement call on bail...........and done so to stop them from escaping justice or trial.............that is up to the judge............if you have a problem then you need to point out the judges who need to be impeached.

SO you really don't give a shit what's wrong with our so called justice system do you?

And the eighth amendment says excessive bail shall not be required.

So the fact is all these people who are in jail awaiting trial and cannot afford bail have had excessive bails put upon them.

And you don't know the name and record of every judge in the country do you?

I am commenting on the system and you want to cherry pick individual cases.
LOL

individual cases....kinda the point moron.........sorry a guy sticking a fork into a stomach.........aka.....manson doesn't compare to a kid stealing a candy bar..

One you don't release......other you call dad and tell him to bring his belt.
Tell you what then you look up the cases for the over 500,000 people in jail right now that have not been convicted of any crime and tell me why they should be held in prison even though they have not been convicted

How about you tell me what in the hell as this to do with Kamala paying the bail of criminals first?

If the bail hill is what you want to die on, make your own thread.
The point that sailed over you blunt little head is that the bail is for people who have not been convicted of any crime

You forgot one magic word............CHARGED
 

By our board standards I guess this means she supports domestic abuse no? Of the 6 men bailed out after domestic violence only one did not have previous domestic violence convictions. Two of the men strangled their victims.

Wonder if the media will question Kamala about her support for this group and their support for men who beat women?


Do we really need a radical of her nature one mental breakdown away from the office of the Presidency.....
You seem not to understand the innocent until proven guilty aspect of out justice system.
DNC threw that out a long time ago...........spare me the Drama

And?

I never said anything supporting the DNC did I?
And yet the DNC funding legal for violent criminals is the point of the op.........kinda implied now isn't it......................Did she join the the RNC without me noticing it.......
What about innocent until proven guilty do you not understand?

Accused of a crime does not equal convicted of a crime.

And a general comment about our Constitutional rights is not an endorsement of any political party.

In case you haven't noticed, neither party gives 2 shits about the constitution
LOL

The Judge decides BAIL not you dummy............those accused with sufficient evidence will get no bail.........so they can't flee or kill again..........

Their rights don't end where ours begin................Kinda like saying Charles Manson should have never been held til trial

Sell your ISM somewhere else.

Yes I can see why you dislike Constitutionalism
How is that a violation...........aka ........go into a murder scene ........police find a guy holding a bloody knife at the scene........should the judge let him go.....

lmao..........The Judge decides if he is a risk to flee or kill again.........he still gets a trial.
Cherry picking.

So tell me do you honestly think the hundreds of thousands of people in prison right now who have not been convicted of any crime are all there because they murdered someone?
I'm telling you how the system works..........and letting go a suspected murderer or rapist pending trial is stupid.......

That is up to a judge..............not me or you......and that is the LAW.........if the judge fucks up then time to get rid of him via impeachment.

now show me the judges you want impeached........other than Kav.......lmao
And I am telling you that is how it is supposed to work but as is often the case reality is a far cry from the ideal

The fact is there are hundreds of thousands of people in jail right now who have not been convicted of any crime and many of them will be there for long periods of time , even years, before they see a trial
And............hire more judges then..........There is no perfect system...........some shit will happen.......but it is still a judgement call on bail...........and done so to stop them from escaping justice or trial.............that is up to the judge............if you have a problem then you need to point out the judges who need to be impeached.

SO you really don't give a shit what's wrong with our so called justice system do you?

And the eighth amendment says excessive bail shall not be required.

So the fact is all these people who are in jail awaiting trial and cannot afford bail have had excessive bails put upon them.

And you don't know the name and record of every judge in the country do you?

I am commenting on the system and you want to cherry pick individual cases.
LOL

individual cases....kinda the point moron.........sorry a guy sticking a fork into a stomach.........aka.....manson doesn't compare to a kid stealing a candy bar..

One you don't release......other you call dad and tell him to bring his belt.
Tell you what then you look up the cases for the over 500,000 people in jail right now that have not been convicted of any crime and tell me why they should be held in prison even though they have not been convicted

How about you tell me what in the hell as this to do with Kamala paying the bail of criminals first?

If the bail hill is what you want to die on, make your own thread.
The point that sailed over you blunt little head is that the bail is for people who have not been convicted of any crime
EVERY CRIMINAL LISTED IN THE OP HAD A BAIL AND KAMALAS PROMOTED ORGANIZATION PAID IT.

THAT is the point of this thread. YOU keep going off topic with your BLM talking points
 

By our board standards I guess this means she supports domestic abuse no? Of the 6 men bailed out after domestic violence only one did not have previous domestic violence convictions. Two of the men strangled their victims.

Wonder if the media will question Kamala about her support for this group and their support for men who beat women?


Do we really need a radical of her nature one mental breakdown away from the office of the Presidency.....
You seem not to understand the innocent until proven guilty aspect of out justice system.
OOOOOO!!!!!!!!
.........but what about the police????!!!!!!! you people burn/loot/murder not only BEFORE the investigation, but when they are found INNOCENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
..look at Taylor's parents!!!! they don't accept the fair/legal verdict!!!!!
etc
you people?

I never burned looted or rioted in my life.

And the OP did not specify that this was solely about rioters, looters and arsonists did it?

But I see you people are too narrow monded to discuss larger issues and therefore have to dumb it all down to somethuing you can wrap your tiny minds around
This thread is about Kamalas support of bailing out VIOLENT MEN.

If you wanna discuss "larger issues" go start your own fucking thread.
Men who have not been convicted of any crime whatsoever.

If the judge sets bail and it is paid then the law is not compromised at all.

And that you think it is then you are commenting on the larger issue
 

By our board standards I guess this means she supports domestic abuse no? Of the 6 men bailed out after domestic violence only one did not have previous domestic violence convictions. Two of the men strangled their victims.

Wonder if the media will question Kamala about her support for this group and their support for men who beat women?


Do we really need a radical of her nature one mental breakdown away from the office of the Presidency.....
You seem not to understand the innocent until proven guilty aspect of out justice system.
OOOOOO!!!!!!!!
.........but what about the police????!!!!!!! you people burn/loot/murder not only BEFORE the investigation, but when they are found INNOCENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
..look at Taylor's parents!!!! they don't accept the fair/legal verdict!!!!!
etc
you people?

I never burned looted or rioted in my life.

And the OP did not specify that this was solely about rioters, looters and arsonists did it?

But I see you people are too narrow monded to discuss larger issues and therefore have to dumb it all down to somethuing you can wrap your tiny minds around
.....hahahhahahahah--you fkd up!!! that's an air tight post....NOW you complain about guilty before innocent---but that's what the blacksBLM/Dems/etc have been doing for YEARS-----AND--and after they have been found innocent, they STILL try to find them guilty!!!!!!
And that incomprehensible post has nothing to do with the OP

And I am not comlaiig I am stating a fact that hundreds of thousands of people are in prison despite not being convicted of any crimes
.....blacks commit crimes at much higher rates==that is why they are incarcerated at HIGHER rates
..this is basic math and common sense
..if anything, they are incarcerated at a lower rate compared to their criminals rates
 

By our board standards I guess this means she supports domestic abuse no? Of the 6 men bailed out after domestic violence only one did not have previous domestic violence convictions. Two of the men strangled their victims.

Wonder if the media will question Kamala about her support for this group and their support for men who beat women?


Do we really need a radical of her nature one mental breakdown away from the office of the Presidency.....
You seem not to understand the innocent until proven guilty aspect of out justice system.
DNC threw that out a long time ago...........spare me the Drama

And?

I never said anything supporting the DNC did I?
And yet the DNC funding legal for violent criminals is the point of the op.........kinda implied now isn't it......................Did she join the the RNC without me noticing it.......
What about innocent until proven guilty do you not understand?

Accused of a crime does not equal convicted of a crime.

And a general comment about our Constitutional rights is not an endorsement of any political party.

In case you haven't noticed, neither party gives 2 shits about the constitution
LOL

The Judge decides BAIL not you dummy............those accused with sufficient evidence will get no bail.........so they can't flee or kill again..........

Their rights don't end where ours begin................Kinda like saying Charles Manson should have never been held til trial

Sell your ISM somewhere else.

Yes I can see why you dislike Constitutionalism
How is that a violation...........aka ........go into a murder scene ........police find a guy holding a bloody knife at the scene........should the judge let him go.....

lmao..........The Judge decides if he is a risk to flee or kill again.........he still gets a trial.
Cherry picking.

So tell me do you honestly think the hundreds of thousands of people in prison right now who have not been convicted of any crime are all there because they murdered someone?
I'm telling you how the system works..........and letting go a suspected murderer or rapist pending trial is stupid.......

That is up to a judge..............not me or you......and that is the LAW.........if the judge fucks up then time to get rid of him via impeachment.

now show me the judges you want impeached........other than Kav.......lmao
And I am telling you that is how it is supposed to work but as is often the case reality is a far cry from the ideal

The fact is there are hundreds of thousands of people in jail right now who have not been convicted of any crime and many of them will be there for long periods of time , even years, before they see a trial
And............hire more judges then..........There is no perfect system...........some shit will happen.......but it is still a judgement call on bail...........and done so to stop them from escaping justice or trial.............that is up to the judge............if you have a problem then you need to point out the judges who need to be impeached.

SO you really don't give a shit what's wrong with our so called justice system do you?

And the eighth amendment says excessive bail shall not be required.

So the fact is all these people who are in jail awaiting trial and cannot afford bail have had excessive bails put upon them.

And you don't know the name and record of every judge in the country do you?

I am commenting on the system and you want to cherry pick individual cases.
LOL

individual cases....kinda the point moron.........sorry a guy sticking a fork into a stomach.........aka.....manson doesn't compare to a kid stealing a candy bar..

One you don't release......other you call dad and tell him to bring his belt.
Tell you what then you look up the cases for the over 500,000 people in jail right now that have not been convicted of any crime and tell me why they should be held in prison even though they have not been convicted

How about you tell me what in the hell as this to do with Kamala paying the bail of criminals first?

If the bail hill is what you want to die on, make your own thread.
The point that sailed over you blunt little head is that the bail is for people who have not been convicted of any crime

You forgot one magic word............CHARGED
And you don't seem to understand that the owrd charged and the word guilty have two different meanings.
 

By our board standards I guess this means she supports domestic abuse no? Of the 6 men bailed out after domestic violence only one did not have previous domestic violence convictions. Two of the men strangled their victims.

Wonder if the media will question Kamala about her support for this group and their support for men who beat women?


Do we really need a radical of her nature one mental breakdown away from the office of the Presidency.....
You seem not to understand the innocent until proven guilty aspect of out justice system.
OOOOOO!!!!!!!!
.........but what about the police????!!!!!!! you people burn/loot/murder not only BEFORE the investigation, but when they are found INNOCENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
..look at Taylor's parents!!!! they don't accept the fair/legal verdict!!!!!
etc
you people?

I never burned looted or rioted in my life.

And the OP did not specify that this was solely about rioters, looters and arsonists did it?

But I see you people are too narrow monded to discuss larger issues and therefore have to dumb it all down to somethuing you can wrap your tiny minds around
This thread is about Kamalas support of bailing out VIOLENT MEN.

If you wanna discuss "larger issues" go start your own fucking thread.
Men who have not been convicted of any crime whatsoever.

If the judge sets bail and it is paid then the law is not compromised at all.

And that you think it is then you are commenting on the larger issue
that's the system..whites are jailed also without a trial/etc
 
Ok............enough of this BLM idiot...........they are doing it to get their looters back out there to Burn Loot and Murder.

Paying this troll to deflect on it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top