Mike Waltz to Clean Out Deep Staters from National Security Council: ‘We’re Taking Resignations at 12:01’ on January 20

[fncceo]

They will never be used.

Well … you SAY that.

 

[the watcher]

Yeah, it doesn't work like that.

Exactly how does it work?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

It’s better than football … they have access to nuclear weapons

No, you don't.

 

[evenokeel]

Mike Waltz to Clean Out Deep Staters from National Security Council: ‘We’re Taking Resignations at 12:01’ on January 20​

Exclusive: Mike Waltz Lays Out Plan to Wipe Out Deep State from NSC

Incoming National Security Advisor Mike Waltz told Breitbart News exclusively that every intelligence NSC official under outgoing President Joe Biden will be expected to vacate the premises by 12:01 p.m. Eastern on Inauguration Day.

www.breitbart.com

9 Jan 2025 ~~ By Matthew Boyle

Incoming National Security Advisor Mike Waltz told Breitbart News exclusively that every intelligence official from the various departments and agencies across the federal government currently detailed to the National Security Council (NSC) at the White House under outgoing President Joe Biden will be expected to vacate the premises by 12:01 p.m. Eastern on Inauguration Day when President-elect Donald Trump is inaugurated again.
Waltz, in a phone interview earlier this week, told Breitbart News that he is making sure everyone understands that it’s “crystal clear what the agenda is.”
“Everybody is going to resign at 12:01 on January 20,” Waltz said. “We’re working through our process to get everybody their clearances and through the transition process now. Our folks know who we want out in the agencies, we’re putting those requests in, and in terms of the detailees they’re all going to go back.”



Commentary:
Unlike the 2017 administration, Waltz will work to revoke the security clearances for people like Anthony Blinken, Jake Sullivan and John Brennan immediately. There’s zero reason for people not employed by the federal government to keep their security clearances, and people like this from the Obama administration used their security clearances to damage Trump once he was in office.
Making sure to remove their security clearances so they can't become security "experts" for the Quisling media or "consult" for big bucks. If any of these lying scumbags are still employed or "consultants" to the government - FIRE them ALL and take away their security clearances too.
One of the first jobs will be to remove the security clearances from many of the former heads of various departments and their minions! Especially Brennan, Clapper and the other individuals who conspired amd signed off on Hunter’s Laptop!
Trump has learned a lot in his first 4 years and has had another 4 years to prepare.
I don't think Democrats are prepared for what is going to know what hit them.

Project 2025

 

[struth]

we'll see.

well, Chucky was right, the deep state certainly came after Trump, but democracy won the day, and he's back and those tyrants are getting canned

 

[evenokeel]

well, Chucky was right, the deep state certainly came after Trump, but democracy won the day, and he's back and those tyrants are getting canned

Project 2025

 

[struth]

Project 2025

Project 2025 didn't make the deep state do what they did.

 

[evenokeel]

Project 2025 didn't make the deep state do what they did.

That is called reverse argumentation and typical of classic authoritarian regime tactics. Besides has anyone every classified in detail what is meant by deep state and what are the categories within this deep state and exactly how does it function, and who or what is its main head or management authority and where is its structure and manifesto and where are actual fact driven proofs of a deep state other than rhetoric and guess work and finger pointing at individual acts? I fail to find a shred of actual proof of a tangible deep state unless it is within the deep state of paranoid minds solely. What did the deep state do exactly? Precise details would help in the conversation.

 

[struth]

That is called reverse argumentation and typical of classic authoritarian regime tactics. Besides has anyone every classified in detail what is meant by deep state and what are the categories within this deep state and exactly how does it function, and who or what is its main head or management authority and where is its structure and manifesto and where are actual fact driven proofs of a deep state other than rhetoric and guess work and finger pointing at individual acts? I fail to find a shred of actual proof of a tangible deep state unless it is within the deep state of paranoid minds solely. What did the deep state do exactly? Precise details would help in the conversation.

you keep talking about Project 2025, nobody really understands why....it's not a law, or rule, and wasn't even written when Chucky made clear the goal of trhe deep state on Maddow's show.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

 

[evenokeel]

you keep talking about Project 2025, nobody really understands why....it's not a law, or rule, and wasn't even written when Chucky made clear the goal of trhe deep state on Maddow's show.

Project 2025 is insidious in its capacity to operate and be implemented without requiring formal legislation. It functions as a blueprint for the future, and due to the Heritage Foundation's deep entrenchment in all aspects of Trump-era and broader Republican policies, it seamlessly integrates into the overarching agenda.

 

[struth]

Project 2025 is insidious in its capacity to operate and be implemented without requiring formal legislation. It functions as a blueprint for the future, and due to the Heritage Foundation's deep entrenchment in all aspects of Trump-era and broader Republican policies, it seamlessly integrates into the overarching agenda.

but it wasn't even written when Chucky gave his interview an announced how the Deep State was going to go after trump.

 

[evenokeel]

but it wasn't even written when Chucky gave his interview an announced how the Deep State was going to go after trump.

Schumer plays no pivotal role in this matter, and the Project made its debut in April 2022.

 

[struth]

Schumer plays no pivotal role in this matter, and the Project made its debut in April 2022.

of course he does, we are literally discussing what he said in the interview.

what in the world are you talking about?

 

[TimFitz]

Mike Waltz to Clean Out Deep Staters from National Security Council: ‘We’re Taking Resignations at 12:01’ on January 20​

Exclusive: Mike Waltz Lays Out Plan to Wipe Out Deep State from NSC

Incoming National Security Advisor Mike Waltz told Breitbart News exclusively that every intelligence NSC official under outgoing President Joe Biden will be expected to vacate the premises by 12:01 p.m. Eastern on Inauguration Day.

www.breitbart.com

9 Jan 2025 ~~ By Matthew Boyle

Incoming National Security Advisor Mike Waltz told Breitbart News exclusively that every intelligence official from the various departments and agencies across the federal government currently detailed to the National Security Council (NSC) at the White House under outgoing President Joe Biden will be expected to vacate the premises by 12:01 p.m. Eastern on Inauguration Day when President-elect Donald Trump is inaugurated again.
Waltz, in a phone interview earlier this week, told Breitbart News that he is making sure everyone understands that it’s “crystal clear what the agenda is.”
“Everybody is going to resign at 12:01 on January 20,” Waltz said. “We’re working through our process to get everybody their clearances and through the transition process now. Our folks know who we want out in the agencies, we’re putting those requests in, and in terms of the detailees they’re all going to go back.”



Commentary:
Unlike the 2017 administration, Waltz will work to revoke the security clearances for people like Anthony Blinken, Jake Sullivan and John Brennan immediately. There’s zero reason for people not employed by the federal government to keep their security clearances, and people like this from the Obama administration used their security clearances to damage Trump once he was in office.
Making sure to remove their security clearances so they can't become security "experts" for the Quisling media or "consult" for big bucks. If any of these lying scumbags are still employed or "consultants" to the government - FIRE them ALL and take away their security clearances too.
One of the first jobs will be to remove the security clearances from many of the former heads of various departments and their minions! Especially Brennan, Clapper and the other individuals who conspired amd signed off on Hunter’s Laptop!
Trump has learned a lot in his first 4 years and has had another 4 years to prepare.
I don't think Democrats are prepared for what is going to know what hit them.

“There’s zero reason for people not employed by the federal government to keep their security clearances,”

Actually, contrary to your uninformed claim, retaining security clearances after government service is quite common. And it usually is because many former federal officials and military officers continue to work with government, although not in government directly.

But your post reeks of celebrating political purges and personal retribution.

I think everyone sees what is coming. Will Trump’s personal grievances define his second term?

He seems to be going right there on day one.

A weak, petty little man with a lot of power.

 

[westwall]

of course he does, we are literally discussing what he said in the interview.

what in the world are you talking about?

It's Im2stupid. He has more socks than imelda marcos.

 

[TimFitz]

Gutting the staff of the National Security Council is a purely political purge. Especially as it is accompanied by the neo facist rhetoric Waltz uses.

All the more so, because the replacement haven’t been vetted at all.

Thisis incompetence and corruption on open display.

 

[westwall]

Gutting the staff of the National Security Council is a purely political purge. Especially as it is accompanied by the neo facist rhetoric Waltz uses.

All the more so, because the replacement haven’t been vetted at all.

Thisis incompetence and corruption on open display.

Nope. They are proven traitors. Getting rid of them hurts the deep state.

 

[evenokeel]

of course he does, we are literally discussing what he said in the interview.

what in the world are you talking about?

of course he does, we are literally discussing what he said in the interview.

what in the world are you talking about?

What they were discussing was the intelligence department.

 

[TimFitz]

Nope. They are proven traitors. Getting rid of them hurts the deep state.

What evidence doYou have that the entire staff of the National Security Council are “proven” traitors????

oh, that’s right. You just made it up.