And on and on and on and on and on and on and on and in n and on and on n and on and on and on and on and on and in n and on and on n and on.
It's physically impossible for you to be this stupid.
Unfortunately it isn’t.
UK lost 383,000 personnel, fought full time Sept 1939 to Sept 1945 - 6 years
Explain the numbers retard
/——/ What do homicidial maniac do in gun free zones?
In dumb America, yes. The 2nd arms the retards, and there's many of those in the US. America is the retard capital of the world with guns.
/—-/ Switzerland isn’t overrun with pampered criminals and gangs who aren’t held accountable.
But how do they manage with RtoBA but America can't?
/——/ I answered your question, you just don’t like the answer.
www.france24.com
/—-/ It’s all about the cheese. They use guns to make the holes. DERP
I keep forgetting how much of a moron you are. I guess I need to explain like I'm dealing with a mentally-retarded child.
The US was also bearing the burden of fighting the suicidal Japanese in the Pacific. Few BRITISH troops were fighting the Japanese, it was mostly Commonwealth troops which you don't factor in. And even the Commonwealth troops weren't suffering the necessarily frontal assaults against entrenched Japanese troops necessitated by island invasions. You also failed to mention the 241,616 Commonwealth and Free Forces troops killed under BRITISH command in WWII. I'm making the conservative estimate that only ten percent of the French and Polish deaths came under BRITISH command. I believe that runs the British number up to 624,616 or 104,102 per year using your six-year figure. When you look at total fatalities, the USA looks pretty good even not considering the difference between fighting the Germans and the Japanese. The BRITISH were also very risk averse after the WWI casualties not being willing to take necessary BRITISH casualties; feeding in non-white troops and ANZACS into the meatgrinder instead of white British troops. The losses per year and total losses under British command exceeded the losses per year and total losses under American command. You remind me of a poster on the Navweaps forums. His attitude is American always bad, British always good. You really do need to grow up.
