Michigan Supreme Court Hands Trump a Win

[Blaster]

Seems like a no brainer, and the Mi. Supreme Court got it right.

Yes, the Michigan Court has judges that make rational decisions.

 

[Blaster]

Colorado sat up and took notice......

Colorado has four clowns pretending to be judges.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

What exactly did they get right, in their arguments? Could you be more specific?

Do you mean the part that sidesteps the core issues and allows more challenges later to keep Trump off the ballot?

That part?

Asking Meister ?

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

No, that's not "part".
What they got right was not overstepping their authority.

So if they ruled another way it would be overstepping?

The Michigan Supreme Court declined to review a ruling of the Michigan Court of Appeals that granted Trump’s request to stop the proceedings at the primary stage, as opposed to the general election. The lower court’s ruling was based on technicalities of Michigan state law regarding when challenges to presidential candidates’ qualifications may be filed. The court held that these challenges may not be filed before the primary–only afterwards.


The Michigan Supreme Court did not address any questions arising under the U.S. Constitution. It did not rule on Trump’s claim that section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment requires federal implementing legislation; it did not rule on Trump’s claim that only Congress can decide presidential candidates’ qualifications; it did not rule on Trump’s claim that the president of the United States is not an “officer of the United States”; and it did not rule on any of various obscure legal theories raised by Trump’s supporters.

It simply declined to overrule a lower court ruling that the Michigan state challenge process does not allow challenges to presidential candidates at the primary stage.

Free Speech For People Statement on Michigan Supreme Court Decision - Free Speech For People

Today, the Michigan Supreme Court issued a ruling in LaBrant v. Benson, the lawsuit brought by Free Speech For People and election lawyer Mark Brewer of Goodman Acker P.C. on behalf of a diverse group of Michigan voters who filed a legal challenge to Donald Trump’s candidacy. The lawsuit was...

freespeechforpeople.org

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Trump will be on the ballot in every state. He can't be kept off. The loony left will ultimately be forced to accept democracy and not be able to suppress votes for political gain.

Better polish off your crystal ball.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Is that what the dipshits at MSNBC are telling you?

Free Speech For People Statement on Michigan Supreme Court Decision - Free Speech For People

Today, the Michigan Supreme Court issued a ruling in LaBrant v. Benson, the lawsuit brought by Free Speech For People and election lawyer Mark Brewer of Goodman Acker P.C. on behalf of a diverse group of Michigan voters who filed a legal challenge to Donald Trump’s candidacy. The lawsuit was...

freespeechforpeople.org

The court - "simply declined to overrule a lower court ruling that the Michigan state challenge process does not allow challenges to presidential candidates at the primary stage."

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

How can someone be found guilty of a crime they’ve never been charged with?

Thas isn't what the case is about. stop regurgitating shit.

next

 

[eagle1462010]

Free Speech For People Statement on Michigan Supreme Court Decision - Free Speech For People

Today, the Michigan Supreme Court issued a ruling in LaBrant v. Benson, the lawsuit brought by Free Speech For People and election lawyer Mark Brewer of Goodman Acker P.C. on behalf of a diverse group of Michigan voters who filed a legal challenge to Donald Trump’s candidacy. The lawsuit was...

freespeechforpeople.org

The court - "simply declined to overrule a lower court ruling that the Michigan state challenge process does not allow challenges to presidential candidates at the primary stage."

Why does Michigan fear facing Trump in an election?? Hmmm

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

"His decision was upheld by the Michigan Court of Appeals, which said: “At the moment, the only event about to occur is the presidential primary election. But as explained, whether Trump is disqualified is irrelevant to his placement on that particular ballot.” - CNN

So the courts punted on procedural grounds. But only for the primaries.

The Michigan Supreme Court did not address any questions arising under the U.S. Constitution. It did not rule on Trump’s claim that section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment requires federal implementing legislation; it did not rule on Trump’s claim that only Congress can decide presidential candidates’ qualifications; it did not rule on Trump’s claim that the president of the United States is not an “officer of the United States”; and it did not rule on any of various obscure legal theories raised by Trump’s supporters. It simply declined to overrule a lower court ruling that the Michigan state challenge process does not allow challenges to presidential candidates at the primary stage.

Free Speech For People Statement on Michigan Supreme Court Decision - Free Speech For People

Today, the Michigan Supreme Court issued a ruling in LaBrant v. Benson, the lawsuit brought by Free Speech For People and election lawyer Mark Brewer of Goodman Acker P.C. on behalf of a diverse group of Michigan voters who filed a legal challenge to Donald Trump’s candidacy. The lawsuit was...

freespeechforpeople.org

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

There is no cause for ineligibility, as it is an unenforceable clause. The only remedy remaining would be impeachment and removal. This is a non-issue invented by a bunch of two bit hacks.

You just made that shit up!

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Elections are not administered by the judicial branch. Judges don’t tell us who we can or can not vote for.

No one said they are.

next

 

[eagle1462010]

Thas isn't what the case is about. stop regurgitating shit.

next

Umm given they States are claiming Insurrection to remove him.....then where has he been found guilty???

TDS isnt proof

 

[tahuyaman]

Thas isn't what the case is about. stop regurgitating shit.

next

It is exactly what it’s about. Stop being a dumb-ass partisan hack.


Liberals are the most dishonest people in America.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Legal reasoning? That's the last thing you want because it shows the entire libtard intent is fallacious.

Colorado is on line #1

 

[tahuyaman]

No one said they are.

next

They are supporting that idea though.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Colorado sat up and took notice......

Dope.

Michigan was not being asked to rule on arguments made in Colorado.

D'Oh!

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Why does Michigan fear facing Trump in an election?? Hmmm

Making up weird shit again?

The local state courts sided with Trump, and the higher state court sided the with others. Michigan? The state of Michigan isn't trying to keep Trump from being elected.

And the issue is about ballot eligibility/access.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Umm given they States are claiming Insurrection to remove him.....then where has he been found guilty???

TDS isnt proof

You are not arguing rationally.

You're not living in the real world.

 

[eagle1462010]

Dope.

Michigan was not being asked to rule on arguments made in Colorado.

D'Oh!

They claimed Insurrection. Ok. I claim Whitmore was an Insurrectionist during BLM. Dont have to prove shit...just make shit up as we go.

How your side rolls....why not

 

[eagle1462010]

Making up weird shit again?

The local state courts sided with Trump, and the higher state court sided the with others. Michigan? The state of Michigan isn't trying to keep Trump from being elected.

And the issue is about ballot eligibility/access.

The filing was an attempt to do that. Or did you miss that?