Michelle Obama declares 'Black Girls Rock!'

[squeeze berry]

right over your nappy head

Thank god its not furry like the hair on your torso.

women like my torso

Its the only thing you have that resembles a penis probably.

no, and I have a talented tongue too

Most people with little dicks practice to make up for their shortcomings.

pretty average TBH

 

[squeeze berry]

white guys rock

No. Black people started rock.

no, cave men started that

Monkey howling is not rock.

true story:

I was the guy that had the car and by buddies came over to my place before we went out for a Saturday afternoon.

I did not leave the house until AFTER I watched Soul Train

Eventually we all watched Soul Train before going out for the day

Still, there was no black equivelant to Led Zeppelin or the Beatles

get a monkey grip glue

 

[ClosedCaption]

Did anyone say what is wrong with saying "black girls rock"? Or is this another whinefest by the majority?

you do realize that "Black" does not refer to where someone is from, or their heritage, or they up bring, or their religion, or anything else about the human being. It speaks purely of ONE thing, the color of the skin a person was born with. Making that distinction is racist. Actually it is against the law.

Seeing different colors is not racism or racist


Signed

-Crayola

When I want a discussion on what being black means I'll be sure to bring that up. This aint it tho

Of course. An APB for a black male is not racist. Or white male. It is a description of a trait of the person not a condemnation of him because they he is black or white.

Thanks for stating the obvious

That is the sad part, it is so obvious.

Its like saying water is wet is a sad thing. Has anyone disagreed with your post? Nope...so what's sad about it?

 

[katsteve2012]

If Mrs. Obama was a white woman named Fitzpatrick and she made a video saying Irish girls rock does anyone think we would see a whining thread here?

 

[katsteve2012]

What`s wrong with trying to instill a little pride and confidence in people who have been at the bottom of society for hundreds of years? She is the first first lady that a black woman can identify with. Why be so whiny and petty about it?

She represents all Americans, not just blacks. She, like her husband is dividing this nation.

Like whites have done for at least 225 years...

Whites fought a democrat war to free blacks, so yes whites have represented blacks, the democrats just have not.

WTF? Predominately white forces on opposing sides of the issue of states rights fought a war.

There was no one "representing" blacks. The abolishment of slavery was to move towards industrializing the country and keeping it whole.

Slaves being freed was just a part of the outcome. There was no humanitarianism involved. It was strictly business.

Jim Crow took effect almost immediately where slavery ended, and stayed in effect for almost 100 years.

 

[katsteve2012]

What`s wrong with trying to instill a little pride and confidence in people who have been at the bottom of society for hundreds of years? She is the first first lady that a black woman can identify with. Why be so whiny and petty about it?

She represents all Americans, not just blacks. She, like her husband is dividing this nation.

Like whites have done for at least 225 years...

names these whites that have done this for at least 225 years.

I would like to have a word with them

No one will listen to your words. You arent important.

I'm still recovering from my laughing fit over him "renouncing" his imaginary Masters teaching credential.

That was F'ing hilarious.

 

[Freewill]

What`s wrong with trying to instill a little pride and confidence in people who have been at the bottom of society for hundreds of years? She is the first first lady that a black woman can identify with. Why be so whiny and petty about it?

She represents all Americans, not just blacks. She, like her husband is dividing this nation.

Like whites have done for at least 225 years...

Whites fought a democrat war to free blacks, so yes whites have represented blacks, the democrats just have not.

WTF? Predominately white forces on opposing sides of the issue of states rights fought a war.

There was no one "representing" blacks. The abolishment of slavery was to move towards industrializing the country and keeping it whole.

Slaves being freed was just a part of the outcome. There was no humanitarianism involved. It was strictly business.

Jim Crow took effect almost immediately where slavery ended, and stayed in effect for almost 100 years.

Jim crow by democrats.

Undoubtedly the democrats hung on to slavery because of economics. But there is absolutely no doubt that electing an abolitionist president brought on the civil war. Can you name anything, other then slavery, that ended with the civil war?

 

[katsteve2012]

What`s wrong with trying to instill a little pride and confidence in people who have been at the bottom of society for hundreds of years? She is the first first lady that a black woman can identify with. Why be so whiny and petty about it?

She represents all Americans, not just blacks. She, like her husband is dividing this nation.

Like whites have done for at least 225 years...

Whites fought a democrat war to free blacks, so yes whites have represented blacks, the democrats just have not.

WTF? Predominately white forces on opposing sides of the issue of states rights fought a war.

There was no one "representing" blacks. The abolishment of slavery was to move towards industrializing the country and keeping it whole.

Slaves being freed was just a part of the outcome. There was no humanitarianism involved. It was strictly business.

Jim Crow took effect almost immediately where slavery ended, and stayed in effect for almost 100 years.

Jim crow by democrats.

Undoubtedly the democrats hung on to slavery because of economics. But there is absolutely no doubt that electing an abolitionist president brought on the civil war. Can you name anything, other then slavery, that ended with the civil war?

Correction. Jim Crow by SOUTHERN democrats. Anyone who knows the history of both parties, knows better than to entirely romanticize either as the champion of civil rights and equality.

Even into the 20th century, If you look at the geographical distribution of opposing votes on the 1964 civil rights bill, overwhelmingly, SOUTHERN democrats AND republicans voted almost unanimously against the passing of the legislation.

The southern factions of BOTH parties were equally as ignorant, backward, bigoted
and draconian in their belief systems.

Next, where did you read that Lincoln was an abolitionist? Lincoln believed that blacks were inferior and was in favor of segregation or repatriation and did not believe in racial equality. If he were alive today, he would be right at home in this forum.


In fact, he even stated :

"I can think of no greater calamity than the assimilation of blacks into society as the white mans equal".

Lastly, you asked what else besides slavery ended with the war for states rights? Obviously, with their primary labor resource compromised the financial stability of the south was severly weakened.

 

[Freewill]

She represents all Americans, not just blacks. She, like her husband is dividing this nation.

Like whites have done for at least 225 years...

Whites fought a democrat war to free blacks, so yes whites have represented blacks, the democrats just have not.

WTF? Predominately white forces on opposing sides of the issue of states rights fought a war.

There was no one "representing" blacks. The abolishment of slavery was to move towards industrializing the country and keeping it whole.

Slaves being freed was just a part of the outcome. There was no humanitarianism involved. It was strictly business.

Jim Crow took effect almost immediately where slavery ended, and stayed in effect for almost 100 years.

Jim crow by democrats.

Undoubtedly the democrats hung on to slavery because of economics. But there is absolutely no doubt that electing an abolitionist president brought on the civil war. Can you name anything, other then slavery, that ended with the civil war?

Correction. Jim Crow by SOUTHERN democrats. Anyone who knows the history of both parties, knows better than to entirely romanticize either as the champion of civil rights and equality.

Even into the 20th century, If you look at the geographical distribution of opposing votes on the 1964 civil rights bill, overwhelmingly, SOUTHERN democrats AND republicans voted almost unanimously against the passing of the legislation.

The southern factions of BOTH parties were equally as ignorant, backward, bigoted
and draconian in their belief systems.

Next, where did you read that Lincoln was an abolitionist? Lincoln believed that blacks were inferior and was in favor of segregation or repatriation and did not believe in racial equality. If he were alive today, he would be right at home in this forum.


In fact, he even stated :

"I can think of no greater calamity than the assimilation of blacks into society as the white mans equal".

Lastly, you asked what else besides slavery ended with the war for states rights? Obviously, with their primary labor resource compromised the financial stability of the south was severly weakened.

OK, I'll give you that Lincoln was not by definition a abolitionist. BUT his election did cause the Union to split over slavery. If he was not an abolitionist then he certainly was considered on. And the only thing I can't think of that ended in because of the Civil War was slavery. If democrats had not gone to war over the issue then the institution would have stay on for years, how many who knows but Lincoln ended the practice that much we do know.

 

[katsteve2012]

Like whites have done for at least 225 years...

Whites fought a democrat war to free blacks, so yes whites have represented blacks, the democrats just have not.

WTF? Predominately white forces on opposing sides of the issue of states rights fought a war.

There was no one "representing" blacks. The abolishment of slavery was to move towards industrializing the country and keeping it whole.

Slaves being freed was just a part of the outcome. There was no humanitarianism involved. It was strictly business.

Jim Crow took effect almost immediately where slavery ended, and stayed in effect for almost 100 years.

Jim crow by democrats.

Undoubtedly the democrats hung on to slavery because of economics. But there is absolutely no doubt that electing an abolitionist president brought on the civil war. Can you name anything, other then slavery, that ended with the civil war?

Correction. Jim Crow by SOUTHERN democrats. Anyone who knows the history of both parties, knows better than to entirely romanticize either as the champion of civil rights and equality.

Even into the 20th century, If you look at the geographical distribution of opposing votes on the 1964 civil rights bill, overwhelmingly, SOUTHERN democrats AND republicans voted almost unanimously against the passing of the legislation.

The southern factions of BOTH parties were equally as ignorant, backward, bigoted
and draconian in their belief systems.

Next, where did you read that Lincoln was an abolitionist? Lincoln believed that blacks were inferior and was in favor of segregation or repatriation and did not believe in racial equality. If he were alive today, he would be right at home in this forum.


In fact, he even stated :

"I can think of no greater calamity than the assimilation of blacks into society as the white mans equal".

Lastly, you asked what else besides slavery ended with the war for states rights? Obviously, with their primary labor resource compromised the financial stability of the south was severly weakened.

OK, I'll give you that Lincoln was not by definition a abolitionist. BUT his election did cause the Union to split over slavery. If he was not an abolitionist then he certainly was considered on. And the only thing I can't think of that ended in because of the Civil War was slavery. If democrats had not gone to war over the issue then the institution would have stay on for years, how many who knows but Lincoln ended the practice that much we do know.

I can see how some would perceive Lincoln that way. He has been kindly romanticized in history and bern falsely lauded as a humanitarian who was empathetic towards slaves. And unfortunately, the same fabrication is being taught in some public schools today.

Here as re a few quotes by Lincoln that I read to my grandchildren when they visited me one weekend and were eagerly telling me how they "learned" about th he end of slavery:

Regarding negro "equality":

I will say, then, that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races [applause]; that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of making voters or jurors of Negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people…And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race.
—The Lincoln-Douglas debates, Charleston, IL, September 18, 1858

There is a natural disgust in the minds of nearly all white people, to the idea of an indiscriminate amalgamation of the white and black races.…Judge Douglas is especially horrified at the thought of the mixing of the blood by the white and black races; agreed for once—a thousand times agreed.…I am not in favor of Negro citizenship [applause].…That is all I have to say about it.
—The Lincoln-Douglas debates, Springfield, IL, June 22, 1857

Negro equality! Fudge!! How long, in the government of a God great enough to make and maintain this universe, shall there continue knaves to vend, and fools to gulp, so low a piece of demagoguism as this?—From Fragments: Notes for Speeches, September, 1859

Regarding the abolition of slavery:

My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave, I would do it…—From a letter to Horace Greeley during the Civil War

 

[katsteve2012]

Whites fought a democrat war to free blacks, so yes whites have represented blacks, the democrats just have not.

WTF? Predominately white forces on opposing sides of the issue of states rights fought a war.

There was no one "representing" blacks. The abolishment of slavery was to move towards industrializing the country and keeping it whole.

Slaves being freed was just a part of the outcome. There was no humanitarianism involved. It was strictly business.

Jim Crow took effect almost immediately where slavery ended, and stayed in effect for almost 100 years.

Jim crow by democrats.

Undoubtedly the democrats hung on to slavery because of economics. But there is absolutely no doubt that electing an abolitionist president brought on the civil war. Can you name anything, other then slavery, that ended with the civil war?

Correction. Jim Crow by SOUTHERN democrats. Anyone who knows the history of both parties, knows better than to entirely romanticize either as the champion of civil rights and equality.

Even into the 20th century, If you look at the geographical distribution of opposing votes on the 1964 civil rights bill, overwhelmingly, SOUTHERN democrats AND republicans voted almost unanimously against the passing of the legislation.

The southern factions of BOTH parties were equally as ignorant, backward, bigoted
and draconian in their belief systems.

Next, where did you read that Lincoln was an abolitionist? Lincoln believed that blacks were inferior and was in favor of segregation or repatriation and did not believe in racial equality. If he were alive today, he would be right at home in this forum.


In fact, he even stated :

"I can think of no greater calamity than the assimilation of blacks into society as the white mans equal".

Lastly, you asked what else besides slavery ended with the war for states rights? Obviously, with their primary labor resource compromised the financial stability of the south was severly weakened.

OK, I'll give you that Lincoln was not by definition a abolitionist. BUT his election did cause the Union to split over slavery. If he was not an abolitionist then he certainly was considered on. And the only thing I can't think of that ended in because of the Civil War was slavery. If democrats had not gone to war over the issue then the institution would have stay on for years, how many who knows but Lincoln ended the practice that much we do know.

The country did not go to war over the issue of slavery. The war was fought to preserve the union and industrialize America as a whole. Slaves were not regarded as any better than horses. Just as when the automobile came into widespread use through mass production, horses were no longer needed, the same process of evolution put slavery out of business.

There were aboltionists who in fact did believe that slavery was immoral.....but Lincoln was not one of them in any way.

I can see how some would perceive Lincoln that way. He has been kindly romanticized in history and been falsely lauded as a humanitarian who was empathetic towards slaves. And unfortunately, the same fabrication is being taught in some public schools today.

Here are a few quotes by Lincoln that I read to my grandchildren when they visited me one weekend and were eagerly telling me how they "learned" how Lincoln brought about the end of slavery....needles to say, they were quite surprised as well as disappointed, but I refused to allow them to be brainwashed by outright lies.

Regarding negro "equality":

I will say, then, that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races [applause]; that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of making voters or jurors of Negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people…And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race.
—The Lincoln-Douglas debates, Charleston, IL, September 18, 1858

There is a natural disgust in the minds of nearly all white people, to the idea of an indiscriminate amalgamation of the white and black races.…Judge Douglas is especially horrified at the thought of the mixing of the blood by the white and black races; agreed for once—a thousand times agreed.…I am not in favor of Negro citizenship [applause].…That is all I have to say about it.
—The Lincoln-Douglas debates, Springfield, IL, June 22, 1857

Negro equality! Fudge!! How long, in the government of a God great enough to make and maintain this universe, shall there continue knaves to vend, and fools to gulp, so low a piece of demagoguism as this?—From Fragments: Notes for Speeches, September, 1859

Regarding the abolition of slavery:

My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave, I would do it…—From a letter to Horace Greeley during the Civil War

 

[Freewill]

WTF? Predominately white forces on opposing sides of the issue of states rights fought a war.

There was no one "representing" blacks. The abolishment of slavery was to move towards industrializing the country and keeping it whole.

Slaves being freed was just a part of the outcome. There was no humanitarianism involved. It was strictly business.

Jim Crow took effect almost immediately where slavery ended, and stayed in effect for almost 100 years.

Jim crow by democrats.

Undoubtedly the democrats hung on to slavery because of economics. But there is absolutely no doubt that electing an abolitionist president brought on the civil war. Can you name anything, other then slavery, that ended with the civil war?

Correction. Jim Crow by SOUTHERN democrats. Anyone who knows the history of both parties, knows better than to entirely romanticize either as the champion of civil rights and equality.

Even into the 20th century, If you look at the geographical distribution of opposing votes on the 1964 civil rights bill, overwhelmingly, SOUTHERN democrats AND republicans voted almost unanimously against the passing of the legislation.

The southern factions of BOTH parties were equally as ignorant, backward, bigoted
and draconian in their belief systems.

Next, where did you read that Lincoln was an abolitionist? Lincoln believed that blacks were inferior and was in favor of segregation or repatriation and did not believe in racial equality. If he were alive today, he would be right at home in this forum.


In fact, he even stated :

"I can think of no greater calamity than the assimilation of blacks into society as the white mans equal".

Lastly, you asked what else besides slavery ended with the war for states rights? Obviously, with their primary labor resource compromised the financial stability of the south was severly weakened.

OK, I'll give you that Lincoln was not by definition a abolitionist. BUT his election did cause the Union to split over slavery. If he was not an abolitionist then he certainly was considered on. And the only thing I can't think of that ended in because of the Civil War was slavery. If democrats had not gone to war over the issue then the institution would have stay on for years, how many who knows but Lincoln ended the practice that much we do know.

The country did not go to war over the issue of slavery. The war was fought to preserve the union and industrialize America as a whole. Slaves were not regarded as any better than horses. Just as when the automobile came into widespread use through mass production, horses were no longer needed, the same process of evolution put slavery out of business.

There were aboltionists who in fact did believe that slavery was immoral.....but Lincoln was not one of them in any way.

I can see how some would perceive Lincoln that way. He has been kindly romanticized in history and been falsely lauded as a humanitarian who was empathetic towards slaves. And unfortunately, the same fabrication is being taught in some public schools today.

Here are a few quotes by Lincoln that I read to my grandchildren when they visited me one weekend and were eagerly telling me how they "learned" how Lincoln brought about the end of slavery....needles to say, they were quite surprised as well as disappointed, but I refused to allow them to be brainwashed by outright lies.

Regarding negro "equality":

I will say, then, that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races [applause]; that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of making voters or jurors of Negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people…And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race.
—The Lincoln-Douglas debates, Charleston, IL, September 18, 1858

There is a natural disgust in the minds of nearly all white people, to the idea of an indiscriminate amalgamation of the white and black races.…Judge Douglas is especially horrified at the thought of the mixing of the blood by the white and black races; agreed for once—a thousand times agreed.…I am not in favor of Negro citizenship [applause].…That is all I have to say about it.
—The Lincoln-Douglas debates, Springfield, IL, June 22, 1857

Negro equality! Fudge!! How long, in the government of a God great enough to make and maintain this universe, shall there continue knaves to vend, and fools to gulp, so low a piece of demagoguism as this?—From Fragments: Notes for Speeches, September, 1859

Regarding the abolition of slavery:

My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave, I would do it…—From a letter to Horace Greeley during the Civil War

And yet the slave states left the union immediately upon his election. SC didn't even put him on the ballot.

But go here and read for yourself the reason given by the states themselves.

The Declaration of Causes of Seceding States

 

[High_Gravity]

Black women and white women rock!

 

[Asclepias]

Jim crow by democrats.

Undoubtedly the democrats hung on to slavery because of economics. But there is absolutely no doubt that electing an abolitionist president brought on the civil war. Can you name anything, other then slavery, that ended with the civil war?

Correction. Jim Crow by SOUTHERN democrats. Anyone who knows the history of both parties, knows better than to entirely romanticize either as the champion of civil rights and equality.

Even into the 20th century, If you look at the geographical distribution of opposing votes on the 1964 civil rights bill, overwhelmingly, SOUTHERN democrats AND republicans voted almost unanimously against the passing of the legislation.

The southern factions of BOTH parties were equally as ignorant, backward, bigoted
and draconian in their belief systems.

Next, where did you read that Lincoln was an abolitionist? Lincoln believed that blacks were inferior and was in favor of segregation or repatriation and did not believe in racial equality. If he were alive today, he would be right at home in this forum.


In fact, he even stated :

"I can think of no greater calamity than the assimilation of blacks into society as the white mans equal".

Lastly, you asked what else besides slavery ended with the war for states rights? Obviously, with their primary labor resource compromised the financial stability of the south was severly weakened.

OK, I'll give you that Lincoln was not by definition a abolitionist. BUT his election did cause the Union to split over slavery. If he was not an abolitionist then he certainly was considered on. And the only thing I can't think of that ended in because of the Civil War was slavery. If democrats had not gone to war over the issue then the institution would have stay on for years, how many who knows but Lincoln ended the practice that much we do know.

The country did not go to war over the issue of slavery. The war was fought to preserve the union and industrialize America as a whole. Slaves were not regarded as any better than horses. Just as when the automobile came into widespread use through mass production, horses were no longer needed, the same process of evolution put slavery out of business.

There were aboltionists who in fact did believe that slavery was immoral.....but Lincoln was not one of them in any way.

I can see how some would perceive Lincoln that way. He has been kindly romanticized in history and been falsely lauded as a humanitarian who was empathetic towards slaves. And unfortunately, the same fabrication is being taught in some public schools today.

Here are a few quotes by Lincoln that I read to my grandchildren when they visited me one weekend and were eagerly telling me how they "learned" how Lincoln brought about the end of slavery....needles to say, they were quite surprised as well as disappointed, but I refused to allow them to be brainwashed by outright lies.

Regarding negro "equality":

I will say, then, that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races [applause]; that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of making voters or jurors of Negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people…And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race.
—The Lincoln-Douglas debates, Charleston, IL, September 18, 1858

There is a natural disgust in the minds of nearly all white people, to the idea of an indiscriminate amalgamation of the white and black races.…Judge Douglas is especially horrified at the thought of the mixing of the blood by the white and black races; agreed for once—a thousand times agreed.…I am not in favor of Negro citizenship [applause].…That is all I have to say about it.
—The Lincoln-Douglas debates, Springfield, IL, June 22, 1857

Negro equality! Fudge!! How long, in the government of a God great enough to make and maintain this universe, shall there continue knaves to vend, and fools to gulp, so low a piece of demagoguism as this?—From Fragments: Notes for Speeches, September, 1859

Regarding the abolition of slavery:

My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave, I would do it…—From a letter to Horace Greeley during the Civil War

And yet the slave states left the union immediately upon his election. SC didn't even put him on the ballot.

But go here and read for yourself the reason given by the states themselves.

The Declaration of Causes of Seceding States

Everyone knows the confederate states seceded due to the issue of slavery. The problem is that people have this romantic notion ole Abe was the savior of the enslaved. He didnt like Black people and only used the issue of slavery as leverage. Matter of fact the slave states that didnt secede didnt have to give up their slaves until much later like the state formed over the issue. West Virginia..

 

[squeeze berry]

What`s wrong with trying to instill a little pride and confidence in people who have been at the bottom of society for hundreds of years? She is the first first lady that a black woman can identify with. Why be so whiny and petty about it?

She represents all Americans, not just blacks. She, like her husband is dividing this nation.

Like whites have done for at least 225 years...

names these whites that have done this for at least 225 years.

I would like to have a word with them

No one will listen to your words. You arent important.

I'm still recovering from my laughing fit over him "renouncing" his imaginary Masters teaching credential.

That was F'ing hilarious.

someone is still butt hurt ^

 

[Asclepias]

She represents all Americans, not just blacks. She, like her husband is dividing this nation.

Like whites have done for at least 225 years...

names these whites that have done this for at least 225 years.

I would like to have a word with them

No one will listen to your words. You arent important.

I'm still recovering from my laughing fit over him "renouncing" his imaginary Masters teaching credential.

That was F'ing hilarious.

someone is still butt hurt ^

You are still the biggest and longest running joke on USMB white boy.

 

[squeeze berry]

Like whites have done for at least 225 years...

names these whites that have done this for at least 225 years.

I would like to have a word with them

No one will listen to your words. You arent important.

I'm still recovering from my laughing fit over him "renouncing" his imaginary Masters teaching credential.

That was F'ing hilarious.

someone is still butt hurt ^

You are still the biggest and longest running joke on USMB white boy.

tell us more about your racist McDonald's thread fail

you are butt hurt too lol

 

[Asclepias]

names these whites that have done this for at least 225 years.

I would like to have a word with them

No one will listen to your words. You arent important.

I'm still recovering from my laughing fit over him "renouncing" his imaginary Masters teaching credential.

That was F'ing hilarious.

someone is still butt hurt ^

You are still the biggest and longest running joke on USMB white boy.

tell us more about your racist McDonald's fail

Tell us what you are talking about by providing a quote.

 

[squeeze berry]

No one will listen to your words. You arent important.

I'm still recovering from my laughing fit over him "renouncing" his imaginary Masters teaching credential.

That was F'ing hilarious.

someone is still butt hurt ^

You are still the biggest and longest running joke on USMB white boy.

tell us more about your racist McDonald's fail

Tell us what you are talking about by providing a quote.

you know what I'mm referring to

that and your jungle bunny civilizations

 

[Asclepias]

I'm still recovering from my laughing fit over him "renouncing" his imaginary Masters teaching credential.

That was F'ing hilarious.

someone is still butt hurt ^

You are still the biggest and longest running joke on USMB white boy.

tell us more about your racist McDonald's fail

Tell us what you are talking about by providing a quote.

you know what I'mm referring to

that and your jungle bunny civilizations

You said fail. Nothing I have posted has ever failed. If you have an example lets see you post it..... Exactly.