Men arrested for speech in Connecticut

toobfreak

Platinum Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2017
Messages
26,248
Reaction score
8,499
Points
910
University of Connecticut Police arrested Monday two men who were allegedly seen in a viral video reciting a racial slur.
Men Arrested For Speech in Connecticut
Oh they aren't taking your freedom gawd you leftist are the dumbest fks on the planet.

But...but...ridicule makes people feel bad! And everyone must feel good. Especially little Johnny arrested and charged for going bang bang with his finger in school. The really great thing is that only YOU can say if you feel ridiculed or feel bad! So you can charge a person for almost anything claiming it hurt your little feelings.
 

Lysistrata

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2017
Messages
12,722
Reaction score
2,624
Points
290
The orange whore's administration is banning speech on an entire topic as a condition to receiving funds under Title X, so I guess that abridgment of freedom of speech is now accepted.
 
OP
MindWars

MindWars

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2016
Messages
42,227
Reaction score
10,614
Points
2,040
upload_2019-10-23_10-43-35.png




but it really began after 911--------the begining of stealing your rights all under the umbrella lie (s) of
SAVE THE CHILDREN
KEEP AMERICA SAFE
SAVE THE GAYS
SAVE THE ANYONE NOT WHITE
 

Lysistrata

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2017
Messages
12,722
Reaction score
2,624
Points
290
View attachment 285884



but it really began after 911--------the begining of stealing your rights all under the umbrella lie (s) of
SAVE THE CHILDREN
KEEP AMERICA SAFE
SAVE THE GAYS
SAVE THE ANYONE NOT WHITE
But you are for "gag rules" that condition the receipt of federal money on compliance with them, even when they run counter to the doctor/patient relationship. Yet you claim to be for "freedom of speech." Why can't people talk about anything that they want to talk about? Don't give me this "freedom of speech" horseshit when your orange whore's administration is violating it at this very moment.
 

emilynghiem

Constitutionalist / Universalist
Joined
Jan 21, 2010
Messages
22,142
Reaction score
3,185
Points
290
Location
National Freedmen's Town District
University of Connecticut Police arrested Monday two men who were allegedly seen in a viral video reciting a racial slur.
Men Arrested For Speech in Connecticut


Oh they aren't taking your freedom gawd you leftist are the dumbest fks on the planet.

????
If it's already a crime to harass people or cause a "disruption or breach of the peace" then why the need to add specifics of content like race or nationality?

This sounds like the additional "hate crime" legislation when murder, assault,
abuse, harassment, etc. were ALREADY crimes WITHOUT specifying reasons.

What hate crime legislation does is ADD more legal work and expenses but without changing the outcome, so it's a hassle and waste. It's somehow "symbolic" hoping to serve as a "deterrent".

But if you are going to go through the trouble of teaching people it's wrong and punishable to do hate crimes and hate speech,
why not teach people NOT TO VIOLATE ANY LAWS IN THE FIRST PLACE
including what is harassment, assault and in general violating CONSENT "DUE PROCESS" and Right of SECURITY and PROTECTIONS of other people.

Why not teach all citizens it is UNLAWFUL to deprive ANYONE of liberty, rights and protections of their persons, principles and property WITHOUT DUE PROCESS to prove they have committed some abuse or crime that MERITS the loss of liberty or property as the penalty agreed upon by written laws?

Why not teach THAT instead as a deterrent
and require OBEDIENCE and COMPLIANCE with laws and due process
in order to INVOKE the same rights, protections and privileges given in the laws?


Wouldn't that level of civics education and responsibility for law enforcement
be a more consistent DETERRENT instead of only teaching not to
target "certain people." Why not respect equal rights and laws for ALL people?
 

Moonglow

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2011
Messages
140,355
Reaction score
13,166
Points
2,220
Location
sw mizzouri
University of Connecticut Police arrested Monday two men who were allegedly seen in a viral video reciting a racial slur.
Men Arrested For Speech in Connecticut


Oh they aren't taking your freedom gawd you leftist are the dumbest fks on the planet.
????
If it's already a crime to harass people or cause a "disruption or breach of the peace" then why the need to add specifics of content like race or nationality?

This sounds like the additional "hate crime" legislation when murder, assault,
abuse, harassment, etc. were ALREADY crimes WITHOUT specifying reasons.

What hate crime legislation does is ADD more legal work and expenses but without changing the outcome, so it's a hassle and waste. It's somehow "symbolic" hoping to serve as a "deterrent".

But if you are going to go through the trouble of teaching people it's wrong and punishable to do hate crimes and hate speech,
why not teach people NOT TO VIOLATE ANY LAWS including what is harassment, assault and in general violating CONSENT "DUE PROCESS" and Right of SECURITY and PROTECTIONS of other people.

Why not teach all citizens it is UNLAWFUL to deprive ANYONE of liberty, rights and protections of their persons, principles and property WITHOUT DUE PROCESS to prove they have committed some abuse or crime that MERITS the loss of liberty or property as the penalty agreed upon by written laws?

Why not teach THAT instead as a deterrent
and require OBEDIENCE and COMPLIANCE with laws and due process
in order to INVOKE the same rights, protections and privileges given in the laws?

Wouldn't that level of civics education and responsibility for law enforcement
be a more consistent DETERRENT instead of only teaching not to
target "certain people." why not respect equal rights and laws for ALL people?
Why? We be humans..
 

emilynghiem

Constitutionalist / Universalist
Joined
Jan 21, 2010
Messages
22,142
Reaction score
3,185
Points
290
Location
National Freedmen's Town District
University of Connecticut Police arrested Monday two men who were allegedly seen in a viral video reciting a racial slur.
Men Arrested For Speech in Connecticut


Oh they aren't taking your freedom gawd you leftist are the dumbest fks on the planet.
I have a freedom to need to call people names? When did we get that freedom?
YES Moonglow
you have freedom of speech as long as you don't break other laws
(such as laws against libel, slander, misrepresentation or fraud, defamation,
false advertising, harassment, making criminal death threats or terrorist threats etc. etc.)

In general, like the example of not yelling fire in a crowded theatre, as long as you don't abuse your rights to cause a disruption or breach of the peace, then you are within the law. just don't abuse any rights or freedoms to 'disparage' or violate the same rights and protections of others including the right of security and right not to be deprived of life or liberty without due process to prove a wrong was committed that merits lost of liberty or other penalty according to the law.
 
OP
MindWars

MindWars

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2016
Messages
42,227
Reaction score
10,614
Points
2,040
University of Connecticut Police arrested Monday two men who were allegedly seen in a viral video reciting a racial slur.
Men Arrested For Speech in Connecticut


Oh they aren't taking your freedom gawd you leftist are the dumbest fks on the planet.

????
If it's already a crime to harass people or cause a "disruption or breach of the peace" then why the need to add specifics of content like race or nationality?

This sounds like the additional "hate crime" legislation when murder, assault,
abuse, harassment, etc. were ALREADY crimes WITHOUT specifying reasons.

What hate crime legislation does is ADD more legal work and expenses but without changing the outcome, so it's a hassle and waste. It's somehow "symbolic" hoping to serve as a "deterrent".

But if you are going to go through the trouble of teaching people it's wrong and punishable to do hate crimes and hate speech,
why not teach people NOT TO VIOLATE ANY LAWS IN THE FIRST PLACE
including what is harassment, assault and in general violating CONSENT "DUE PROCESS" and Right of SECURITY and PROTECTIONS of other people.

Why not teach all citizens it is UNLAWFUL to deprive ANYONE of liberty, rights and protections of their persons, principles and property WITHOUT DUE PROCESS to prove they have committed some abuse or crime that MERITS the loss of liberty or property as the penalty agreed upon by written laws?

Why not teach THAT instead as a deterrent
and require OBEDIENCE and COMPLIANCE with laws and due process
in order to INVOKE the same rights, protections and privileges given in the laws?


Wouldn't that level of civics education and responsibility for law enforcement
be a more consistent DETERRENT instead of only teaching not to
target "certain people." Why not respect equal rights and laws for ALL people?
Using race is a way to " virtual signal" others into the same thinking. It's also a way public schools teach kids " what to think not how to think.

" Protected classes" get away with crimes others can't. That's why child molesters who were reading stories in a public library were not sent to jail for any probation violations etc.. They walk free another person wouldn't.
 
OP
MindWars

MindWars

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2016
Messages
42,227
Reaction score
10,614
Points
2,040
View attachment 285884



but it really began after 911--------the begining of stealing your rights all under the umbrella lie (s) of
SAVE THE CHILDREN
KEEP AMERICA SAFE
SAVE THE GAYS
SAVE THE ANYONE NOT WHITE
But you are for "gag rules" that condition the receipt of federal money on compliance with them, even when they run counter to the doctor/patient relationship. Yet you claim to be for "freedom of speech." Why can't people talk about anything that they want to talk about? Don't give me this "freedom of speech" horseshit when your orange whore's administration is violating it at this very moment.

LOL
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top