Eh...I don't know. It's not like she was saying anything bad about barron. She was really attacking trump in this and only used Barron because of his name. I'm just not seeing the outrage here. Had she said something disparaging about barron, I could see it, but this wasnt that.
What am I not seeing here?
Let turn the table and the same person used Obama daughters in the discussion because he calls one Princess as a nickname, what do you thing would be the left response?
Barron's was used to take a cheap shot at Trump and no matter how you spin it, well it is wrong!
Leave Barron and Tiffany out of the conversation!
Again, I dont believe she was trying to make any kind of slant against barron, I think she was just trying to claim that trump isnt a king, and just because he named his trump barron, doesnt make him a baron, meaning, trump isnt royalty. That's really all I think this was here.
I agree, a presidents children should be off limits for attacks and such, I just dont think lady was actually attacking barron, she was making a snide remark against trump himself.
Unless there is something barron has said or done that would make people think he himself thinks he is some kind of royalty. The reference she made was so obscure because as far as I'm aware, barron hasnt really done anything newsworthy to draw attention to himself, this makes me think this whole thing was directed at trump, and she only used barron because his name is almost the same as "baron".
I think people are blowing this all out of proportion is all.