What I posted is very sound logical thinking, common sense and awareness of human nature. What you just posted is the longest string of mindless garbage, Jabberwocky and gibberish in thread HISTORY.
You ain't seen nothing yet, pedro. But I would say that your sound logical thinking, common sense and awareness of human nature are mambo dogface banana patch with bluebird flaming tinkleberries.
In other words, non-germane, and irrelevant to the conversation at hand. When someone asks you a question about the nature of climatology for instance, your response cannot be a treatise on why you like dragonflies.
Hence the lambasting of your excessive intellectual decrepitude.
ONE question pea brain...are you claiming the vast majority of climatologists and scientists, who spent years in college studying their chosen field, and working in the field at their craft have suddenly decided to throw that all away, and sign up for some leftist political agenda and agree to try to fool the public?
Now here's how a sane, rational and intelligent adult handles a direct question that is of some relation to the subject at hand.
I am not saying that the 'vast majority' of climatologists have decided to 'throw it all away'. I am saying that SOME climatologists, namely Hansen, Mann, Jones and a few dozen others have decided that political outcomes are more important than scientific truth. They have corrupted and allowed to be corrupted the peer review process by compatriots who were willing to take their work on face value, and be put off politely when questioned on HOW they did their testings, provide copies of their raw data and other rational, acceptable requests. These scientists then went with the assumption that Mann/Hansen/Jones and their associates involved were telling the truth and their science was accurate.
When it was discovered that political ideologues in the IPCC had corrupted that institution's work with using unsourced, un-peer reviewed activist propaganda as sources, many who had stood by the IPCC as well as their findings, reacted in quite appropriate horror.
Then the Climategate emails where the programmers left in the source code notes on how to FORCE data to give the conclusion desired by the warmists, there was now not only reasonable doubt in the science, but evidence of criminal fraud for the sake of both defrauding the world populace at large as well as corrupt scientific journals and organziations for the sake of political results and personal gain. (To a government 4 million is nothing, but to a research scientist... that's FOUR MILLION DOLLARS!!)
So there you have it. Politics corrupted the IPCC, East Anglia University, NOAA, NASA and was enabled by ignorance, trust and naivete that a few people would dare to do such horrible things. Combine this with political, industrial and commercial forces that stood and still stand to gain TRILLIONS of dollars in ill gotten funds due to the fraudulent science, are still applying pressure to get legislation passed to guarantee their revenue flow.
And you see now scientists who before would have defended these errant frauds with their lives now having to backpedel and say... maybe we were too hasty to take their words for it... in essence. And with new research, new 'unbelievers' are born and they are rapidly overtaking the currently stunted and stifled peer review process that has been made into a kangaroo court of pro-Anthropogenic Climate Change only.
This is what we have been saying for months... years now. Green is dead. Very dead. The dreams of getting global Fabian socialism rammed through on it's back is over, and even if it does pass before it all falls apart, it's just more mass in the air about to fall with the rest of the crumbling structure of global fascism that the left is so in love with.
There's your adult answer. If you want articles, be your own research monkey. Adults also do that too.
