Media Suppression - RNC and carpet bombing Gaza

Where is anything about early morning sneak attacks on a civilian population that they murdered, raped, tortured, kidnapped, held hostage etc. What is it you and your ilk was saying--From the river to the sea--- How about this, "From the river to the sea, make Israel Hamas-free."
Indeed, a terrorist attack kills 1,000 Israelis carpet bombing the entire Gaza strip is deemed appropriate. Please stop pretending to have moral or ethics.
 
You obviously do not understand carpet bombing. What is happening in Gaza are strategic strikes.
Gaza isn't being carpet bombed yet, Brooks is advocating that it should be and the US press are suppressing this call to carry out genocide, that's shameful, a supposedly Christian country too.
 
Last edited:
Your conflating the strategy for achieving it and the advocacy of it.
Your entire thread is a non-starter. You are worried about an individual with no power to bring about what he proposes, about an action the Israelis are incapable of employing. So what exactly is your point?
 
Your entire thread is a non-starter. You are worried about an individual with no power to bring about what he proposes, about an action the Israelis are incapable of employing. So what exactly is your point?
So you apparently didn't read the OP, here's the point you asked about:

This individual is blatantly calling for genocide in Gaza, and (apparently) no US media outlet - no matter their political leaning - wants to report this, did Brooks say these things or didn't he?

I'm interested to see if you (or anyone) know the answer to the question.
 
So you apparently didn't read the OP, here's the point you asked about:

This individual is blatantly calling for genocide in Gaza, and (apparently) no US media outlet - no matter their political leaning - wants to report this, did Brooks say these things or didn't he?

I'm interested to see if you (or anyone) know the answer to the question.
Brooks is not an elected official in the United States government, so nothing he says means anything. Look at the position he holds! Why would he support anything else?
 
Brooks is not an elected official in the United States government, so nothing he says means anything. Look at the position he holds! Why would he support anything else?
Well my question will have to remain unanswered I guess.
 
Without trying to be too harsh, your question is irrelevant and thus stupid. How's that for a succinct answer.
The question has an answer, if you don't know then fine but please don't start trolling the thread and attempt to steer it off topic.
 
What do you do with a rabid dog (HAMAS)? You put it down. It will never infect another being again.
The Nazis spoke that way about European Jewry.

During the Holocaust, Nazis referred to Jews as rats. Hutus involved in the Rwanda genocide called Tutsis cockroaches. Slave owners throughout history considered slaves subhuman animals. In Less Than Human, David Livingstone Smith argues that it's important to define and describe dehumanization, because it's what opens the door for cruelty and genocide.
When the Nazis described Jews as Untermenschen, or subhumans, they didn't mean it metaphorically, says Smith. "They didn't mean they were like subhumans. They meant they were literally subhuman."

Congratulations, your a latter day Nazi.
 
The Nazis spoke that way about European Jewry.




Congratulations, your a latter day Nazi.
You are the one who is attempting to justify the murder, rape, torture, kidnapping and illegal imprisonment of civilians by HAMAS. Run along Nazi. You must be a democrat too. How long did it take you to read Alinsky's Rules for Radicals.
 
You are the one who is attempting to justify the murder, rape, torture, kidnapping and illegal imprisonment of civilians by HAMAS. Run along Nazi. You must be a democrat too. How long did it take you to read Alinsky's Rules for Radicals.
No, I've condemned Hamas terrorism many times, I've stated clearly that the Oct 7th attack was a terrorist attack, it meets the definition of a terrorist attack. So I do not "justify" it at all, I simply apply the same standard to Israel and point out that Israel does this on a far greater scale than does Hamas.
 
Well that isn't the topic of this thread, it's about whether Brooks did or did not say what these reports attribute to him.
Why didn't you just google his speech. All the speeches are on Youtube.



He didn't say what is claimed.
 
No, I've condemned Hamas terrorism many times, I've stated clearly that the Oct 7th attack was a terrorist attack, it meets the definition of a terrorist attack. So I do not "justify" it at all, I simply apply the same standard to Israel and point out that Israel does this on a far greater scale than does Hamas.
Sure, your neighbor attacks you and your family numerous times. You retaliate to ensure that it NEVER HAPPENS again and you, the victim, are the bad guy. You sound like the democrats trying to shift blame to Trump because some moron shot him. Do you think the SS was wrong because they killed Crooks? SMH, you morons make no logical sense.
 
Why didn't you just google his speech. All the speeches are on Youtube.



He didn't say what is claimed.

He didn't say it in that speech, he may have said it elsewhere, perhaps an interview after his speech. Anyway its reported in the Israel press that he did say it.
 
Sure, your neighbor attacks you and your family numerous times. You retaliate to ensure that it NEVER HAPPENS again and you, the victim, are the bad guy. You sound like the democrats trying to shift blame to Trump because some moron shot him. Do you think the SS was wrong because they killed Crooks? SMH, you morons make no logical sense.
Do you agree that Israel has committed acts of terrorism?
 

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom