Media Bias on Israel.

Israel defends herself against terrorist tunnels, along with the terrorists who use them, and gets worldwide denunciation for its totally justified actions.

Egypt demolishes 800 homes, tunnels and terror bases, and gets………………………Not a single Sound!

I wonder why!


Mike Cunningham.

Author : That same month, the Creative Zionist Coalition gave her the Queen Esther Award for Jewish Heroism. - See more at: About Pamela Geller Atlas Shrugs

I figured it had to be. I have had a hard time finding much from Egypt that they blamed Gaza and they had taken care of the tunnels already. Most of the news on this is from Israel. Oh also did Egypt have to enter Gaza when they destroyed tunnels in 2013, no, and did they kill anyone destroying these homes, no, they did pay most of the people who accepted.

SiSi is in Israel's pocket, and Israel loves to make its own news. Egypt has not accused Gaza , as far as I''ve seen, that they were the ones who attacked the Egyptians, and besides it has been happening since SISI imprisoned and killed many of the Muslim Brotherhood.

Unlike Israel who had to enter gaza and killed women , children etc.
 
What total nonsense.

Israel is widely supported for destroying terrorist tunnels, both in Europe and the US.

What it is attacked for is buolding new settlements, and bombing resdiential areas in Gaza.
 
Israel defends herself against terrorist tunnels, along with the terrorists who use them, and gets worldwide denunciation for its totally justified actions.

Egypt demolishes 800 homes, tunnels and terror bases, and gets………………………Not a single Sound!

I wonder why!


Mike Cunningham.

Author : That same month, the Creative Zionist Coalition gave her the Queen Esther Award for Jewish Heroism. - See more at: About Pamela Geller Atlas Shrugs

I figured it had to be. I have had a hard time finding much from Egypt that they blamed Gaza and they had taken care of the tunnels already. Most of the news on this is from Israel. Oh also did Egypt have to enter Gaza when they destroyed tunnels in 2013, no, and did they kill anyone destroying these homes, no, they did pay most of the people who accepted.

SiSi is in Israel's pocket, and Israel loves to make its own news. Egypt has not accused Gaza , as far as I''ve seen, that they were the ones who attacked the Egyptians, and besides it has been happening since SISI imprisoned and killed many of the Muslim Brotherhood.

Unlike Israel who had to enter gaza and killed women , children etc.





Once again you ignore the facts that show Israel only had the one option, so tell be brain of the century how do you block a tunnel that only has one entrance underneath a house inside gaza. Dug 60 feet to 90 feet deep and ending in a chamber 15 feet deep under a School inside Israel packed with H.E.

Now this should be a good one from the ISLAMONAZI STOOGE as she looks for answers that defend the tunnels and defends the targeting of Israeli children.
 
What total nonsense.

Israel is widely supported for destroying terrorist tunnels, both in Europe and the US.

What it is attacked for is buolding new settlements, and bombing resdiential areas in Gaza.




The settlements are not illegal and are sanctioned by INTERNATIONAL LAW, just as the residential areas ceased to be residential areas once hamas and the Palestinians used them as bases for firing weapons of war at Israel.

If the media was more open and up front about these facts then it would be hamas that would be attacked by the world. And maybe the UN would do something about the war crimes committed by the Palestinians.
 
What total nonsense.

Israel is widely supported for destroying terrorist tunnels, both in Europe and the US.

What it is attacked for is buolding new settlements, and bombing resdiential areas in Gaza.




The settlements are not illegal and are sanctioned by INTERNATIONAL LAW, just as the residential areas ceased to be residential areas once hamas and the Palestinians used them as bases for firing weapons of war at Israel.

If the media was more open and up front about these facts then it would be hamas that would be attacked by the world. And maybe the UN would do something about the war crimes committed by the Palestinians.

Arab-Israeli Conflict is not about Settlements

There are certain bromides regarding the Arab-Israeli conflict that are accepted as essential truths, but which actually have no basis in fact. Chief among these is that the conflict is about Palestinian land claims and supposedly illegal Jewish settlements in Judea and Samaria.

However, the conflict is not really about settlements, which are perfectly legal under international law, or about the rights of a Palestinian people that is more a modern political creation than a historical reality. It’s not about anything Israel says or does.

Rather, the conflict is about the rejection of Israel’s very right to exist.

The Arab-Muslim refusal to accept the existence of a Jewish State predates Israel’s acquisition of Judea and Samaria in 1967. It also predates the first attempted war of extermination against Israel in 1948, as well as the unanimous Arab-Muslim rejection of partition in 1947.

The veracity of this thesis can be tested by asking one simple question. If the conflict were really about achieving Palestinian statehood in Judea, Samaria, and Gaza, why was such a state never created when these lands were occupied (and illegally so) by Jordan and Egypt between 1948 and 1967? Where was the international outcry for an independent state of Palestine then?

From New English Review.
 
Are you kidding yourself. Its about Israel's oppression land grab over the years. Yes they came in 1948 and took it by storm, yes the Arabs didn't want them there, they came in boatloads taking over. There has not been peace since as Israel takes more and more land. I mean even the British changed their minds and they made the British leave. They did not come a neighbors but as for lack of a better word, over takers , with money from the US rich Jews and Rothschild. The Arabs didn't stand a chance against them. They have been land grabbing since, and their goal to have all of Israel, and regime changes in Syria , Lebanon and Iran, and well Iraq is such a mess now. They have taken over just like they did in the States, locusts.
 
Actually due to some stupid peace agreement in 1979 Israel has to allow Egypt to send their troops into the Sinai desert. I think I"d be telling Israel where to go. This once again was all Israel propaganda, as SISI nor the Egyptians said Gaza had anything to do with it. But SISI is in office only because with the blessing of Israel, the US and Saudi Arabia's , the big 3 who want to control the ME.
 
Penlope -

They did not arrive in 1948.

The first boats arrived in 1899, others in 1901 and every few teaes during the 1920s and 30s.

It's also worth remembering that Jews had been living in Jericho and Jerusalemt for 2,700 years. They had never left.
 
Penlope - They did not arrive in 1948. The first boats arrived in 1899, others in 1901 and every few teaes during the 1920s and 30s. It's also worth remembering that Jews had been living in Jericho and Jerusalemt for 2,700 years. They had never left.
That was not 'defensive' by Israel. Jordan sent a small number of troops into the West Bank after Israeli forces had been massacring and expelling massive numbers or Palestinians, for a land grab.
Yeah! Now we know where palistanians have a right-of-return to! It's Jordan!
 
Penlope -

They did not arrive in 1948.

The first boats arrived in 1899, others in 1901 and every few teaes during the 1920s and 30s.

It's also worth remembering that Jews had been living in Jericho and Jerusalemt for 2,700 years. They had never left.

I'm mainly referring to when it was declared a state, yes your right they had started sending poor ones there to work the land, build roads and wells, to make it more enticing to the wealthier Jews.

Most Jews had left Palestine since Babylon, few returned and remained.
 
Penlope -

They did not arrive in 1948.

The first boats arrived in 1899, others in 1901 and every few teaes during the 1920s and 30s.

It's also worth remembering that Jews had been living in Jericho and Jerusalemt for 2,700 years. They had never left.

I'm mainly referring to when it was declared a state, yes your right they had started sending poor ones there to work the land, build roads and wells, to make it more enticing to the wealthier Jews.

Most Jews had left Palestine since Babylon, few returned and remained.

Really Penelope,

You are reaching Phoenell-like levels of wrongness here.

The earlier settlers to come to Israel 1899 - 1935 were kibbuzniks, frequently left wing, always ideological, always escaping poverty and oppression. They were also often educated, resourceful and tough.

Their arrival had nothing to do with directly enticing others, because 200 people settled a kibbutz, and that was it. They didn't need anyone else.

Nor were they being 'sent' anywhere, they organised themselves in the ghettoes of Budapest, Smolensk or Lviv, and travelled in groups operating largely under their own steam.

If you don't know facts - ask.

There is no point in bluffing.
 
Penlope -

They did not arrive in 1948.

The first boats arrived in 1899, others in 1901 and every few teaes during the 1920s and 30s.

It's also worth remembering that Jews had been living in Jericho and Jerusalemt for 2,700 years. They had never left.

I'm mainly referring to when it was declared a state, yes your right they had started sending poor ones there to work the land, build roads and wells, to make it more enticing to the wealthier Jews.

Most Jews had left Palestine since Babylon, few returned and remained.

Really Penelope,

You are reaching Phoenell-like levels of wrongness here.

The earlier settlers to come to Israel 1899 - 1935 were kibbuzniks, frequently left wing, always ideological, always escaping poverty and oppression. They were also often educated, resourceful and tough.

Their arrival had nothing to do with directly enticing others, because 200 people settled a kibbutz, and that was it. They didn't need anyone else.

Nor were they being 'sent' anywhere, they organised themselves in the ghettoes of Budapest, Smolensk or Lviv, and travelled in groups operating largely under their own steam.

If you don't know facts - ask.

There is no point in bluffing.

That timeline covers some of those immigrants, though there would undoubtedly have been some Jews immigrating in previous years and centuries. People movement as individuals is normal.

The question is when did Jews move there with a dream of invasion and appropriation of the territory by stealth, intrigue & force? And taking 1896 as a starting point - the year of Theodor Herzl published ambition on Zionism would be a reasonable approximation.

The fact that non-invasive Jews could and had lived there for hundreds of years indicates that Judaism is not the problem, but Zionism is.
 
15th post
Beelebub -

Good points. The year 1899 is often used in Israel as the starting point of modern aliyah, as I believe that marked the first kibbtuz-like settlement.
 
This article is very interesting , an unknown name but really instrumental in beginning of Zionism

Reverend William H. Hechler - The Christian minister who legitimized Theodor Herzl
By Jerry Klinger
“Political Zionism, and the modern state of Israel, was largely born from the fierce will of Theodor Herzl. Were it not for a Christian, Herzl would have remained an eccentric, obscure Austrian writer, long forgotten by now. It is Rev. Hechler, and the Zionist debt to him, that is forgotten.”
Theodore Herzl and Rev. William Hechler and the Zionist Beginnings
 
Back
Top Bottom