Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"Guilt by proximity"Taken collectively, the 19 images – which the committee said came from Epstein’s estate – reinforce the financier was tied in the past to a wide variety of powerful and high-profile people whose ties to him are now under significant scrutiny.
One image released Friday shows what appears to be a bowl of novelty condoms with a caricature of Trump’s face; the bowl has a sign saying, “Trump condom $4.50,” and each condom bears an image of Trump’s face with the text, “I’m HUUUUGE!” Another showed Trump with six women with leis whose faces were redacted by the committee. Others included Steve Bannon and Epstein taking a photograph in a mirror; Bill Clinton with Epstein, Maxwell and another couple; and tech billionaire Bill Gates with the former Prince Andrew. Former Harvard President Larry Summers and lawyer Alan Dershowitz also appeared in pictures from the estate.
It doesn't matter if he is a Dem or Repub. These people need to be exposed. Yes, trump fought for a while to keep this information under wraps, but he eventually lost. I would love to see who was frolicking with underaged girls...whether it is Clinton, trump, or Bannon. The powerful and wealthy think they can get away with anything.
Well we can look at what Dems on the hill did with the pic as evidence of their intent
//* unbelievable smear job attempted by dirty Congress. Con is thy name. NY Post to the rescue. So sad. *//
![]()
Democrats' Sneaky Attempt to Defame President Trump as a P*dophile in New Epstein Photo Dump Fails in Embarrassing Fashion When This Unredacted Image Emerges (PHOTO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Cullen Linebarger
A vile attempt by the House Democrats to defame President Trump as a child predator failed in deserved and humiliating fashion after an unredacted image was discovered.www.thegatewaypundit.com
- leftwinger
- Replies: 680
- Forum: Politics
Why would the Hawaiian tropic models be targeted?
This means faces, identifiable photos, or names of people who are not the subject of the investigation need to be redacted unless there’s a compelling legal reason otherwise.“No agency shall disclose any record which is contained in a system of records by any means ... to any person, or to another agency, except pursuant to a written request by, or with the prior written consent of, the individual to whom the record pertains…”
(5 U.S.C. § 552a(b))
I don't see the white house denying that the photo is genuine.....That pic isn’t from Trump. The dems in the house released it and said it came from the Epstein estate
Trump posing with twenty years old women at an event. OMGI don't see the white house denying that the photo is genuine.....
WrongThis means faces, identifiable photos, or names of people who are not the subject of the investigation need to be redacted unless there’s a compelling legal reason otherwise.
so was the deep state Z95,000 photos. This dude was running a serious operation.
Why would anyone think Trump taking a pic with Hawaiian tropic models was a slight? You seem unhinged if you think it isBecause there are a lot of unhinged people in the world and a lot of them are vicious, unthinking supporters of Donald Trump who take exception to ANYTHING that they believe or feel is a slight against him.
I mean, the photo itself is innocuous in my opinion, the fact that Trump is in it, doesn't really mean anything in context of when it was taken if that is all that is known about it. Why it's a part of Epstein estate could be questioned but it doesn't, in & of itself mean anything negative. Presumably no one knew at that point in time that Trump would go on to become president of the United States.
But these documents are being released for a specific reason which could lead to prosecution or litigation so in THAT context:
1. The Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. § 552a)
This is one of the most important statutory protections governing how federal agencies handle personal information.
- It prohibits the government from disclosing personal data about individuals without consent unless an exemption applies.
- “Personal data” includes things like names, addresses, images, and other identifying characteristics.
- Agencies must redact or withhold such information unless there’s a statutory basis to release it.
This means faces, identifiable photos, or names of people who are not the subject of the investigation need to be redacted unless there’s a compelling legal reason otherwise.
Why would they? There nothing wrong with the president or anyone taking a pic with Hawaiian tropic modelsI don't see the white house denying that the photo is genuine.....
its obviously the photos with Epstein that's the big dealWhy would they? There nothing wrong with the president or anyone taking a pic with Hawaiian tropic models
![]()
Exclusive | Unredacted Trump photos from Epstein files dump reveal glamorous group of adult models: ‘He was very gentlemanly’
The legal team for Epstein’s estate told The Post that faces were redacted based on their request.nypost.com
Bannon spent a great deal of time with Epstein.Being as it's facing Epstein, probably wasn't aware.
Not really, I’ve taken photos with tons of people I barely knew at eventsits obviously the photos with Epstein that's the big deal
kinda contradicts his story that he barely knew the guy when there's mountains of intimate correspondence between the wo, and more and more photos of the together emerging all the time
What the files released so far is Epstein spent most of his time, with a direct line to Obama’s White House counsel https://www.cnn.com/2025/12/11/us/video/ebof-kfile-epstein-kathy-ruemmler-obama-aideBannon spent a great deal of time with Epstein.
Bannon knew EXACTLY what Epstein was.
Steve Bannon was close friends with Jeff Epstein and exchanged hundreds of emails with the pedophile, including strategizing how to improve Epstein's image.
He was even working on a film project trying to portray Epstein as a great guy. He had filmed 15 hours by the time Epstein was arrested.
There is little doubt Bannon had seen the items on Epstein's desk and all the other perversions he had around the place.
Epstein would return the favors to Bannon. In one case, Bannon missed a flight from Heathrow airport due to protesters slowing him down, Epstein hooked him up.
BANNON: Protesters slowed down speech don't think I can make the flight we r enroute to heathrow
EPSTEIN: There. Is a gulf air that leaves at 950 with a stop in Bahrain.
BANNON: U r an amazing assistant.
A few days later, Epstein touched base with Bannon again.
EPSTEIN: how does it feel to have the most highly paid travel agent in history
BANNON: U r pretty good asst
EPSTEIN: Massages. Not Included.
These two were close, and Bannon was well aware his good friend was under suspicion for raping little girls.
EPSTEIN: Btw Im in New York tonite thru sat , if you want to visit under the cover of darkness or breakfast tomorrow if you like.
BANNON: Do u have access that's not the front door-- they have 24/7 surveillance on u
The fact that you so casually call.someone a pedo decimates your narrative and credibility. I try to be objective and not accept a.couple of innocuous photos of people posing. This is about as low hanging fruit as one could grab.
In answer to your question "Why would anyone..." the following is what I was responding to which directly states that "they" are trying to fool America by implying that the women in the photo with Trump are underaged. The commenter is basing this belief and reasoning on the fact that the faces of the models have been blacked out by the agency which produced the documents, before handing them over.Why would anyone think Trump taking a pic with Hawaiian tropic models was a slight? You seem unhinged if you think it is
Congress is not a federal agency so that law doesn’t apply
So you are unhinged?In answer to your question "Why would anyone..." the following is what I was responding to which directly states that "they" are trying to fool America by implying that the women in the photo with Trump are underaged. The commenter is basing this belief and reasoning on the fact that the faces of the models have been blacked out by the agency which produced the documents, before handing them over.
The Privacy Act is only one of several laws that mandate that a federal agency redact PII (personally identifying information) and other sensitive information before turning over items in their possession to the requestor. The fact that it's Congress doesn't change this, if that is who indeed the requestor is listed as.
View attachment 1193417
They had no dinner and he got no Epstein donation either....A market agency hired by Jefferies l, invited him? And yoj think that makes it ok? The question is what was discussed at their private dinner?
And what other Dems took direction via text from him?
And why did the Dem DA try to get him off the sex offender list?
Deflecting is just another form of pedo protection
We need answers
Yeah, I don’t see any evidence tonsuooort your claimThey had no dinner and he got no Epstein donation either....
Please give it another shot, with your next fallacy.....
No, I am not holding up well....my dad was admitted in to a hospital at 2:30 am yesterday, which was the day scheduled for my mom's funeral....we had to postpone it, they have been doing nothing but tests on my dad and pumping oxygen in to him which he is doing good on, and he found out tonight he has an abdominal aortic aneurysm, has to have a less risky surgery done with a catheter and stints...and it's scheduled for Monday...Care4all
Good to see you back on the board, I hope you're holding up okay.
Why are you defending PEDOs?So they're not complying with the new law you went bonkers over getting passed?
December 19th I believe.
He said people would be hurt. I'd take that as reference to the 70+ victims He helped by providing information for Epstein's prosecution. Now their names will be know publicly. I'm sure many would want to not look back.