meanwhile, back on Epsteins Island

Yeah, I don’t see any evidence tonsuooort your claim
It was reported....you can Google it...

and you can't show evidence that he got a donation from Epstein, which would be recorded, because he didn't get one.
 
Bannon knew EXACTLY what Epstein was.
Good point....back it up with proof.
Steve Bannon was close friends with Jeff Epstein and exchanged hundreds of emails with the pedophile, including strategizing how to improve Epstein's image.
So did one of Obamas WH counsel attorneys.

Does that indicate the Obama WH also knew and looked the other way?
 
It was reported....you can Google it...

and you can't show evidence that he got a donation from Epstein, which would be recorded, because he didn't get one.
Doesn't matter.....he obviously knew about it at the time.
 
Donald Trump met Marla Maples, who was Miss Hawaian Tropic in 1984, at 21.

He was married to Ivana Trump at the time, but kept his affair hidden until 1989 when Donald had Marla join him in Colorado at a ski resort Trump was on vacation with his family, including Ivana, of which it made headlines around the world, with Ivana and Marla's confrontation front page. DJT was pleased with the publicity.

He married Marla in 1993 after he had a child, Tiffany, with her.

My point is, yes those Hawaiian Tropic models/contestants he was with in that photo above, were likely 18-21 or slightly less, he was around a 40yr old married man, trying to get laid with any young, vunerable model, that would have him. Marla, included


I asked A/I about it...



Ron Rice, the founder of Hawaiian Tropic pageants, recalled that Donald Trump would call him and ask him to bring models to his parties, and Rice would comply, bringing "a bunch of models."
 
Last edited:
You are fighting hard to keep justice from happening, for the women who were abused when minor girls... by Epstein and friends.
You seem awfully eager to deny due process there, missy. You didn't seem interested in this subject for the past 4 years, hmmmm. Typical hypocrisy from you.
 
Taken collectively, the 19 images – which the committee said came from Epstein’s estate – reinforce the financier was tied in the past to a wide variety of powerful and high-profile people whose ties to him are now under significant scrutiny.

One image released Friday shows what appears to be a bowl of novelty condoms with a caricature of Trump’s face; the bowl has a sign saying, “Trump condom $4.50,” and each condom bears an image of Trump’s face with the text, “I’m HUUUUGE!” Another showed Trump with six women with leis whose faces were redacted by the committee. Others included Steve Bannon and Epstein taking a photograph in a mirror; Bill Clinton with Epstein, Maxwell and another couple; and tech billionaire Bill Gates with the former Prince Andrew. Former Harvard President Larry Summers and lawyer Alan Dershowitz also appeared in pictures from the estate.
It doesn't matter if he is a Dem or Repub. These people need to be exposed. Yes, trump fought for a while to keep this information under wraps, but he eventually lost. I would love to see who was frolicking with underaged girls...whether it is Clinton, trump, or Bannon. The powerful and wealthy think they can get away with anything.
The lie that Trump and Epstien didn't have a relationship has been exposed.
 
So you are unhinged?

Congress isn’t a federal agency so the law doesn’t apply to them
Don't get all pissy with me just because you made a mistake and mistook the Privacy Act as applying to Congress when it applies to the custodian of records, the person or rather the agency, who actually has the data in their possession, which in this case is the Department of Justice.

It's the DOJ who made the redactions so that the documents can be released to the public.

Congress isn’t the one redacting the photos. The redactions are done by the agency or entity responding to the document request, typically in compliance with the Privacy Act and related protections for personally identifiable information (PII).
That includes faces of individuals in some cases — especially if the person isn’t a public figure or if there's risk of misidentification, legal liability, or privacy violations.
Assuming that these redactions are intended to imply that the women were underage is just that — an assumption — and not one supported by the facts of the redaction process.
 
You are fighting hard to keep justice from happening, for the women who were abused when minor girls... by Epstein and friends.
Not at all. Just pointing out you and your like kind unsupported derangement.

BTW, those Hawaiian Tropic girls were in their twenties.
 
Last edited:
No, I am not holding up well....my dad was admitted in to a hospital at 2:30 am yesterday, which was the day scheduled for my mom's funeral....we had to postpone it, they have been doing nothing but tests on my dad and pumping oxygen in to him which he is doing good on, and he found out tonight he has an abdominal aortic aneurysm, has to have a less risky surgery done with a catheter and stints...and it's scheduled for Monday... :eek:. It's just been one thing after another, and haven't had time to mourn my mom because we are too busy trying to save my dad....

Fighting, ummmm.... debating on this board, is actually a relief from all else going on!
Oh my gosh, I am so sorry to hear this.

Ironically, our family and very close friends are dealing with the same type of loss and major health issues which I believe is why I especially felt your loss as well. I will ask everyone to keep you & your family in their prayers so that He may help ease your grief and sustain you through all of this.🌹
 
Don't get all pissy with me just because you made a mistake and mistook the Privacy Act as applying to Congress when it applies to the custodian of records, the person or rather the agency, who actually has the data in their possession, which in this case is the Department of Justice.

It's the DOJ who made the redactions so that the documents can be released to the public.

Congress isn’t the one redacting the photos. The redactions are done by the agency or entity responding to the document request, typically in compliance with the Privacy Act and related protections for personally identifiable information (PII).
That includes faces of individuals in some cases — especially if the person isn’t a public figure or if there's risk of misidentification, legal liability, or privacy violations.
Assuming that these redactions are intended to imply that the women were underage is just that — an assumption — and not one supported by the facts of the redaction process.
The photos were given to Congress from the Epstein estate

Dems in Congress then released them

Not an agency


Try again dembot
 
15th post
The photos were given to Congress from the Epstein estate

Dems in Congress then released them

Not an agency


Try again dembot
Why does Epstein have this photograph in his stuff...in his estate?
 
Yes He did.............

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) said President Donald Trump was “furious” with her over her advocacy of the release of the Epstein files, and that doing so would “hurt people.”
So?
That's what Trump and his cult are saying.
Trump could give a **** what happens to anyone but himself.
Greene sat for an interview with 60 Minutes, which will air on Sunday. CBS affiliates across the country offered a preview during local newscasts on Friday night.

View attachment 1193250
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom