... Meanwhile... as Trump Continues to Dominate... Hitlery is Losing Steam...

Who is saying that a Hillary is a shoe in?

i believe it has been said many times on this forum over the past couple years by some real stupid liberdummies. :up:

You have to love how they kicked her to the curb EIGHT years ago for some Sweet talker who talked right over their heads with gibberish BS and they said it was, because of her vote on Iraq. Now here she is EIGHT years older, damn near 70years old and they want her to be the President this country. these people are crazy in that party
 
Trump's 25% 'popularity' is supposed to be remarkable in some way?

lol, 2012:

Rick Perry was at 34% in the GOP primary polls in September of 2011.

Herman Cain was at 26% in the GOP primary polls in October of 2011.

Newt Gingrich was at 33% in those polls in December of 2011.

Rick Santorum was at 34% in those polls in February of 2012.

...and every one of the above was leading at the time.

RealClearPolitics - Election 2012 - 2012 Republican Presidential Nomination
 
As embarassing as it sounds......he is your leading candidate



With so many Republicans...

It is a game of political Whack-a-mole


Per Right leaning folks on this board Walker, Rubio, or Kasich are the likely nominee. I agree. All would be very formidable in a general election.

The 37 Trump threads a day are fun....knock yourself out. :) But when Dems start talking about the real candidates versus bullshit I'll pay attention.
Jeb Bush will be your eventual candidate......but it is fun watching Trump humiliate the party

We understand he's the Republican candidate of your wet dreams.


They're like a fucking broken record. Jeb or Trump. They never talk about anyone else.

The eventual nominee will kill Hillary, and they know it. That's why all the crap about Jeb or Trump. Don't worry about it. The fact they refuse to discuss Walker, Rubio, or Kasich tells you how truly afraid they are.

Rubio and Kasich both suck. Rubio is a big amnesty supporter, and Kasich is a RINO. Walker or Cruz are the only ones I would support.

Based on what specifically? Just for my information, I'm asking.
 
Hillary's problem is that people have known her for years, and the more they see of her, the less they like her. She can't unring that bell.
To Hillarys advantage she gets to run against the party that thinks Trump is its best candidate
Link to someone saying Trump is our best candidate?
Oh, I was being funny. You never have anything to substantiate what you write and when called on it you deflect.
Run, Forrest! Run!
Seems 22% of Republicans support Trump. Walker is next at around 12%. Most others under 10%...... Making Trump their best candidate

You lose again Rabbi
So you cannot substantiate your statement and in fact there is no one saying Trump is the best candidate, only people who like him.
Thanks fro proving you are a worthless pile of shit. Again.
Trump is the best candidate until someone better comes along.
Get someone else to poll better and he can be your best candidate


You don't have much of a memory do you? Howard Dean?
At some point in early 2016, Hillary will cancel her campaign due to health issues.

I suspect this will be after the Michael Bay Benghazi film comes out.
Good point. She will discover that she really likes being a grandmother best of all.


I don't think it will be for any affirmative value. Dropping out will have to look like a sacrifice so she can be a martyr.
 
Trump's 25% 'popularity' is supposed to be remarkable in some way?

lol, 2012:

Rick Perry was at 34% in the GOP primary polls in September of 2011.

Herman Cain was at 26% in the GOP primary polls in October of 2011.

Newt Gingrich was at 33% in those polls in December of 2011.

Rick Santorum was at 34% in those polls in February of 2012.

...and every one of the above was leading at the time.

RealClearPolitics - Election 2012 - 2012 Republican Presidential Nomination

And remember Howard Dean is 2004....
 
So in your world, polls alone, determine who is the best candidate?

Leading the polls doesn't make them the best candidate.
As of today.....they do

Provide a better measure
Generally people with informed opinions are preferred to unreliable polls that simply measure name recognition. At least in the real world. In yours, who knows?
As of today.....Trump is your best candidate

Nobody else in the Republican clown car has stepped up

How humiliating for the once grand old party






And what do we have? Proven corrupt Hillary, avowed socialist Bernie, who I like as a person, but his policies would destroy this country, the man who personally set in motion the policies that led to the Baltimore riots, a 9/11 truther who thinks the NSA is out to "get him", an anarchist, an anti GMO anti science activist, the evangelical (yes we have them too) who believes God commanded him to run, this is his 8th attempt.....Then there's Chaffee who can't figure out which Party he should be in, Kelso is too rightwing for most Democrats though I like his 2AM position, Astor is only a Democrat so he can run against Hillary, and on and on.

Our candidates are every bit as shitty as the repubs are.
Interesting point

Thanks for posting

Democrats have all their eggs in one basket.
 
As of today.....they do

Provide a better measure
Generally people with informed opinions are preferred to unreliable polls that simply measure name recognition. At least in the real world. In yours, who knows?
As of today.....Trump is your best candidate

Nobody else in the Republican clown car has stepped up

How humiliating for the once grand old party






And what do we have? Proven corrupt Hillary, avowed socialist Bernie, who I like as a person, but his policies would destroy this country, the man who personally set in motion the policies that led to the Baltimore riots, a 9/11 truther who thinks the NSA is out to "get him", an anarchist, an anti GMO anti science activist, the evangelical (yes we have them too) who believes God commanded him to run, this is his 8th attempt.....Then there's Chaffee who can't figure out which Party he should be in, Kelso is too rightwing for most Democrats though I like his 2AM position, Astor is only a Democrat so he can run against Hillary, and on and on.

Our candidates are every bit as shitty as the repubs are.
Interesting point

Thanks for posting

Democrats have all their eggs in one basket.

And they're old eggs, at that.
 
As of today.....they do

Provide a better measure
Generally people with informed opinions are preferred to unreliable polls that simply measure name recognition. At least in the real world. In yours, who knows?
As of today.....Trump is your best candidate

Nobody else in the Republican clown car has stepped up

How humiliating for the once grand old party






And what do we have? Proven corrupt Hillary, avowed socialist Bernie, who I like as a person, but his policies would destroy this country, the man who personally set in motion the policies that led to the Baltimore riots, a 9/11 truther who thinks the NSA is out to "get him", an anarchist, an anti GMO anti science activist, the evangelical (yes we have them too) who believes God commanded him to run, this is his 8th attempt.....Then there's Chaffee who can't figure out which Party he should be in, Kelso is too rightwing for most Democrats though I like his 2AM position, Astor is only a Democrat so he can run against Hillary, and on and on.

Our candidates are every bit as shitty as the repubs are.
Interesting point

Thanks for posting

Democrats have all their eggs in one basket.
Maybe. But Sanders is generating real excitement in the party and I wouldnt be surprised to see him win some early primaries. Which would put the hurt on Democrats in a big way because if anyone isnt electable, its' Bernie.
 
Now here she is EIGHT years older, damn near 70years old and they want her to be the President this country.
So what? She's the same age as Reagan was and doesn't have Alzheimers.
Reagan didnt have alzheimers either, nitwit.
Reagan also hadnt suffered a stroke, nor did Reagan have a history of lying, breaking rules, or taking payoffs in exchange for favorable decisions.
 
Uncle slimy Joe will jump in the race when hilda beast goes down in flames and will be the libtard nominee.
 
Now here she is EIGHT years older, damn near 70years old and they want her to be the President this country.
So what? She's the same age as Reagan was and doesn't have Alzheimers.
But she's a crook.
Reagan sold weapons to Iran so that he could give money to contra death squads. That trumps any of the unproven allegations about Hillary in my book.

can I be frank?

Hillary is the most disgusting, untrustworthy, pathetic excuse for a human being next to Barak Obama that has ever been a representative for the United States.

If anyone... ANYONE ...votes for Hillary, this Country has reached a new low and the movie "Idiocracy" will prove prophetic.
 
Godwin's Law in the Title to the thread! :eek:

Does that count as the OP post #1 for the ultimate record?

I dunno De Te... he got 6 agrees, 2 Thank You's and 1 informative
What did you get?

:rofl:

You keeping score of how many extremist rightwingers pat each other on the back these days?

That might be a "feel good" for them but it doesn't detract from the fact that the OP invoked Godwin's Law in the thread title which is all I pointed out. I didn't make an entire thread about it so you are comparing apples to oranges.

Like 99% of the threads bashing Hillary you can be sure that it will attract the various lowlifes and trolls who are on my ignore list.

Now why don't you explain to the class what your comment had to do with the content of the OP?

Use both sides of the page if necessary.
 

Forum List

Back
Top