McCarthy Admits Benghazi Designed to Flatten Hillary Poll Numbers

[Zander]

McCarthy never admitted anything, except that hiLIARy's lies have hurt her campaign.

LOL, stay tuned to the news, starting tomorrow.

Your crystal ball may prove to be cloudy. HiLIARy has a long track record of lies, unbelievable lies, and more lies....

 

[nuhuh]

Yet another thread that manufactures an interpretation that only a left wing moron could come up with.....

of the same statement.

At least they are consistent....consistently wrong.

Yeah, too bad the right wing moron can't pick up a newspaper and read the New York Times, The Washington Post, The Guardian, The Los Angeles Times, Bloomberg who all concurred that McCarthy put his foot in his mouth.

Oh look....a McCarthy moment.

Looks like this poster just admitted others do his thinking for him.

Even for a switch hitter you are uncommonly stupid. I read to gain knowledge and arrive at conclusions based on a variety of sources, but you likely already knew this which makes your silly attempt at trolling truly pathetic.

 

[Zander]

It comes as no surprise, of course, that most on the right lack the honesty and integrity to just admit the truth: that 'Benghazi' was solely about 'getting Clinton,' pure partisanism having nothing to do with objective facts or evidence.

Explain then why it was so critical for Rice to say on 5 network shows BEFORE the facts were in that it was a video?
Explain why Hillary told The Mother of Benghazi victim said: Hillary and Susan Rice told me “nose to nose” that the Mohammed video was to blame"
Mother of Benghazi victim: Hillary and Susan Rice told me “nose to nose” that the Mohammed video was to blame

Why was it so important less then 7 weeks from re-election to blame the video? WHY do you suppose??

Why did the House Select Committee on Intelligence vindicate Susan Rice 20 months ago and you haven't acknowledged it.

Do you believe that the Benghazi attacks were because of a "youtube video"?

 

[Blackrook]

So now we know why Republicans spent $20 Million dollars, to affect the poll numbers of a Democratic front runner for the party's nomination.




Current House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) told Fox News host Sean Hannity during an interview on Monday night that the Select Committee, chaired by Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) that Clinton’s dropping poll numbers are evidence of the effectiveness of the committee.

McCarthy, who is reportedly running to take over for recently deposed House Speaker John Boehner, told Hannity:

“Everybody thought Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right? But we put together a Benghazi Special Committee — a Select Committee — what are her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping.”

There you go, now Republicans can start by paying back that $20 million in wasted public money. What scum.

If it saves us from the hellish nightmare of a Hillary Clinton administration, it was the best money ever spent.

 

[nuhuh]

It comes as no surprise, of course, that most on the right lack the honesty and integrity to just admit the truth: that 'Benghazi' was solely about 'getting Clinton,' pure partisanism having nothing to do with objective facts or evidence.

Explain then why it was so critical for Rice to say on 5 network shows BEFORE the facts were in that it was a video?
Explain why Hillary told The Mother of Benghazi victim said: Hillary and Susan Rice told me “nose to nose” that the Mohammed video was to blame"
Mother of Benghazi victim: Hillary and Susan Rice told me “nose to nose” that the Mohammed video was to blame

Why was it so important less then 7 weeks from re-election to blame the video? WHY do you suppose??

Why did the House Select Committee on Intelligence vindicate Susan Rice 20 months ago and you haven't acknowledged it.

Do you believe that the Benghazi attacks were because of a "youtube video"?

What I find interesting are the number of things brought up daily that were debunked by the Republicans own committee 20 months ago, yet find a way to resurface almost daily.

 

[nuhuh]

So now we know why Republicans spent $20 Million dollars, to affect the poll numbers of a Democratic front runner for the party's nomination.




Current House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) told Fox News host Sean Hannity during an interview on Monday night that the Select Committee, chaired by Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) that Clinton’s dropping poll numbers are evidence of the effectiveness of the committee.

McCarthy, who is reportedly running to take over for recently deposed House Speaker John Boehner, told Hannity:

“Everybody thought Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right? But we put together a Benghazi Special Committee — a Select Committee — what are her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping.”

There you go, now Republicans can start by paying back that $20 million in wasted public money. What scum.

If it saves us from the hellish nightmare of a Hillary Clinton administration, it was the best money ever spent.

Now we're getting somewhere.

 

[Blackrook]

Democrats don't care that Hillary Clinton is responsible for the death of four Americans.

They don't care that they framed a man who made an anti-Muslim video, and threw him in prison based on a lie.

Or that Hillary, when asked what happened at Benghazi, said, "What does it matter?"

*****.

 

[GWV5903]

Do you believe that the Benghazi attacks were because of a "youtube video"?

They do, they also believed in the Obama phone, Obama gas, Obama free every f'ing thing...

 

[Sallow]

 

[Sallow]

It comes as no surprise, of course, that most on the right lack the honesty and integrity to just admit the truth: that 'Benghazi' was solely about 'getting Clinton,' pure partisanism having nothing to do with objective facts or evidence.

Explain then why it was so critical for Rice to say on 5 network shows BEFORE the facts were in that it was a video?
Explain why Hillary told The Mother of Benghazi victim said: Hillary and Susan Rice told me “nose to nose” that the Mohammed video was to blame"
Mother of Benghazi victim: Hillary and Susan Rice told me “nose to nose” that the Mohammed video was to blame

Why was it so important less then 7 weeks from re-election to blame the video? WHY do you suppose??

Why did the House Select Committee on Intelligence vindicate Susan Rice 20 months ago and you haven't acknowledged it.

Do you believe that the Benghazi attacks were because of a "youtube video"?

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/18/w...egin-to-answer-questions-on-assault.html?_r=0

 

[kaz]

The lie that was told and retold by the administration until long after everyone knew otherwise that they thought it was a spontaneous attack alone easily justified the cost of the investigation. Obama and Rice both clearly lied whatever you want to call it, they both knew it wasn't. If Republicans knowingly lied, you'd be screaming for their heads, not arguing that somehow it wasn't illegal

But it never was a legitimate investigation. It was a charade and a fraud used to discredit a legitimate candidate for office.

What was a charade and a fraud? Obama obstructed and got away with it, it was his choice to not come clean

You really need to watch the video in the OP and then get with what we are discussing - the fact that Benghazi was a ruse to bring down a legitimate candidate.

I did watch the video, Holmes. He didn't say any of that. He said he wanted it known what she did

If that is your interpretation we'll have to disagree. Unfortunately from what I have read the press is no longer in agreement and will now examine the partisan nature of the committee. That spells disaster when the MSM no longer stands with you and it begins an unraveling you won't be able to stop.

the lame stream media is with the left and not with the truth, wow, stop the presses...

 

[Sallow]

Democrats don't care that Hillary Clinton is responsible for the death of four Americans.

They don't care that they framed a man who made an anti-Muslim video, and threw him in prison based on a lie.

Or that Hillary, when asked what happened at Benghazi, said, "What does it matter?"

*****.

Nothing you posted has even a shred of truth behind it.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Creating a coverup and then attempting to coverup the coverup exacerbates the failure exponentially. Involving potential criminal activity in the process of the coverups takes the failure of duty to an extreme level.

See? You keep saying this part but havent and cant show what the cover up was. Neither can the Republicans investigating show it happened either.

So what Rice blubber out about a video was the truth?? Obama saying the same was factual,it was a spontaneous demonstration over a video that was view just a few hundred time before the attack?

The only thing to :see is how low will Clinton ass sucker go

All you did was ask question after question then claimed that someone was pro Clinton. You showed nothing about proof or evidence..your bad.

If you want to be convincing try being credible instead of acting like a TMZ producer

 

[kaz]

So $20 Million spent on a select committee investigation into the death of an Ambassador and three others serving their country, as the result of a sitting President, Secretary of State, and their minions claiming it was the result of a video and not gross incompetence, due to their failure, for political reasons, to admit that the attack was a well planned terrorist operation, has someone's panties in a bunch? Come on, if they had simply told the truth in the first place would this have resulted in a $20 million dollar investigation? I think not, but this administration chose to lie, and when one lies there is a price to be paid.Then again would we have known, courtesy of the FOIA, that the Secretary of State was conducting high level and top secret state business on non approved non secure private server, that she owned, in violation of federal protocol? Count the lies, contradictions, and misstatements, then tell me what you have, the reincarnation of the plumbers and one Richard M Nixon. But that is OK provided its a democrat, right?

Republicans own investigations have vindicated those involved, so something is clearly wrong with your findings. The $20 million investigation was a front to take down a legitimate candidate for office and if that isn't a crime it should be.

The lie that was told and retold by the administration until long after everyone knew otherwise that they thought it was a spontaneous attack alone easily justified the cost of the investigation. Obama and Rice both clearly lied whatever you want to call it, they both knew it wasn't. If Republicans knowingly lied, you'd be screaming for their heads, not arguing that somehow it wasn't illegal

But it never was a legitimate investigation. It was a charade and a fraud used to discredit a legitimate candidate for office.

It certainly was a legit investigation. Four Americans were killed and it was important enough for those who were indirectly responsible to coverup their failure. That's a warrant for an investigation if ever there was one.

hmmm, how about a warrant issued for the deaths of 4,500 Americans based on the lies by George W, Bush, Cheney, Rice, Rumsfeld and the rest of the neo conservatives?

Yet again the partisan omission of the Democrats who did it arm in arm with them

 

[healthmyths]

It comes as no surprise, of course, that most on the right lack the honesty and integrity to just admit the truth: that 'Benghazi' was solely about 'getting Clinton,' pure partisanism having nothing to do with objective facts or evidence.

Explain then why it was so critical for Rice to say on 5 network shows BEFORE the facts were in that it was a video?
Explain why Hillary told The Mother of Benghazi victim said: Hillary and Susan Rice told me “nose to nose” that the Mohammed video was to blame"
Mother of Benghazi victim: Hillary and Susan Rice told me “nose to nose” that the Mohammed video was to blame

Why was it so important less then 7 weeks from re-election to blame the video? WHY do you suppose??

Why did the House Select Committee on Intelligence vindicate Susan Rice 20 months ago and you haven't acknowledged it.

Do you believe that the Benghazi attacks were because of a "youtube video"?

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/18/w...egin-to-answer-questions-on-assault.html?_r=0

From the above link:
As the attack in Benghazi was unfolding a few hours later, Mr. Abu Khattala told fellow Islamist fighters and others that the assault was retaliation for the same insulting video, according to people who heard him.

In an interview a few days later, he pointedly declined to say whether an offensive online video might indeed warrant the destruction of the diplomatic mission or the killing of the ambassador. “From a religious point of view, it is hard to say whether it is good or bad,” he said.

So based on the BIASED NYT article it would appear "according to people" "WHAT people"???
But in a specific interview he declined to blame the video.

So RATHER then WASTE the political imagery i.e. "blame the video" rather then THE FACT it was a planned terrorist attack and Mr. Khattala had been involved daily in terrorist attacks Rice/Hillary immediately blamed the video!
Because it was less then 7 weeks from Obama's re-election.
You would think that rather then coming out with an immediate reaction "blame the video", why couldn't the WH wait till the FACTS were known?
BECAUSE of these bumper stickers which shows success in the War on Terror!

 

[Sallow]

Republicans own investigations have vindicated those involved, so something is clearly wrong with your findings. The $20 million investigation was a front to take down a legitimate candidate for office and if that isn't a crime it should be.

The lie that was told and retold by the administration until long after everyone knew otherwise that they thought it was a spontaneous attack alone easily justified the cost of the investigation. Obama and Rice both clearly lied whatever you want to call it, they both knew it wasn't. If Republicans knowingly lied, you'd be screaming for their heads, not arguing that somehow it wasn't illegal

But it never was a legitimate investigation. It was a charade and a fraud used to discredit a legitimate candidate for office.

It certainly was a legit investigation. Four Americans were killed and it was important enough for those who were indirectly responsible to coverup their failure. That's a warrant for an investigation if ever there was one.

hmmm, how about a warrant issued for the deaths of 4,500 Americans based on the lies by George W, Bush, Cheney, Rice, Rumsfeld and the rest of the neo conservatives?

Yet again the partisan omission of the Democrats who did it arm in arm with them

Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda link allegations - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[Carla_Danger]

the party of death (progressive/democrat party) comes to Hillary's rescue again. the hell with Mr. Stevens an INNOCENT American civilian who was KILLED because of her and Obama Screw ups

How many more investigations do you need, dingbat?

 

[Sallow]

It comes as no surprise, of course, that most on the right lack the honesty and integrity to just admit the truth: that 'Benghazi' was solely about 'getting Clinton,' pure partisanism having nothing to do with objective facts or evidence.

Explain then why it was so critical for Rice to say on 5 network shows BEFORE the facts were in that it was a video?
Explain why Hillary told The Mother of Benghazi victim said: Hillary and Susan Rice told me “nose to nose” that the Mohammed video was to blame"
Mother of Benghazi victim: Hillary and Susan Rice told me “nose to nose” that the Mohammed video was to blame

Why was it so important less then 7 weeks from re-election to blame the video? WHY do you suppose??

Why did the House Select Committee on Intelligence vindicate Susan Rice 20 months ago and you haven't acknowledged it.

Do you believe that the Benghazi attacks were because of a "youtube video"?

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/18/w...egin-to-answer-questions-on-assault.html?_r=0

From the above link:
As the attack in Benghazi was unfolding a few hours later, Mr. Abu Khattala told fellow Islamist fighters and others that the assault was retaliation for the same insulting video, according to people who heard him.

In an interview a few days later, he pointedly declined to say whether an offensive online video might indeed warrant the destruction of the diplomatic mission or the killing of the ambassador. “From a religious point of view, it is hard to say whether it is good or bad,” he said.

So based on the BIASED NYT article it would appear "according to people" "WHAT people"???
But in a specific interview he declined to blame the video.

So RATHER then WASTE the political imagery i.e. "blame the video" rather then THE FACT it was a planned terrorist attack and Mr. Khattala had been involved daily in terrorist attacks Rice/Hillary immediately blamed the video!
Because it was less then 7 weeks from Obama's re-election.
You would think that rather then coming out with an immediate reaction "blame the video", why couldn't the WH wait till the FACTS were known?
BECAUSE of these bumper stickers which shows success in the War on Terror!
View attachment 51169

There were protests and violence all over the middle east over a video made by a criminal who never should have posted it as a condition of his release.

Yet you folks CONTINUE to deny it had anything to do with what happened in Libya, as if they somehow missed it.

You folks also DIRECTLY link Al Qaeda to the attack although much of the leadership of Al Qaeda was decimated at the time.

And you folks put up a man as a candidate, who while the attack was on going, was criticizing the sitting commander in chief and trying to make the attack an election issue. Something that was unprecedented, entirely unique and a very dangerous thing to do.

Now? After 7 investigations we have a GOP leader ADMIT, it was ENTIRELY a political ploy.

What do you do? Back to square one.

Amazing.

 

[Carla_Danger]

This constant whining from Hillary supporters about the "cost" of investigations is rather amusing since the reason that they have dragged on for as long as they have is that the Clinton's have a long history of stonewalling any investigation into their activities.

First they deny anything happened and blame the whole thing on "Right Wing Conspiracies"...
Then they hide evidence from investigators...
Then when enough time has passed they declare that the scandal is "old news"...and that the investigation is costing the taxpayers millions and needs to stop!

It's what Slick Willie and Hilly DO!

Funny how you can sit here and pontificate over "right wing conspiracy" while destroying the memories of the fallen who died at Benghazi to score political points. Now we know who the real scum in Washington politics are.

What difference does it make? 4 dead Americans = bumps in the road

Frank is dancing on their graves.

 

[hunarcy]

Explain then why it was so critical for Rice to say on 5 network shows BEFORE the facts were in that it was a video?
Explain why Hillary told The Mother of Benghazi victim said: Hillary and Susan Rice told me “nose to nose” that the Mohammed video was to blame"
Mother of Benghazi victim: Hillary and Susan Rice told me “nose to nose” that the Mohammed video was to blame

Why was it so important less then 7 weeks from re-election to blame the video? WHY do you suppose??

Why did the House Select Committee on Intelligence vindicate Susan Rice 20 months ago and you haven't acknowledged it.

Do you believe that the Benghazi attacks were because of a "youtube video"?

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/18/w...egin-to-answer-questions-on-assault.html?_r=0

From the above link:
As the attack in Benghazi was unfolding a few hours later, Mr. Abu Khattala told fellow Islamist fighters and others that the assault was retaliation for the same insulting video, according to people who heard him.

In an interview a few days later, he pointedly declined to say whether an offensive online video might indeed warrant the destruction of the diplomatic mission or the killing of the ambassador. “From a religious point of view, it is hard to say whether it is good or bad,” he said.

So based on the BIASED NYT article it would appear "according to people" "WHAT people"???
But in a specific interview he declined to blame the video.

So RATHER then WASTE the political imagery i.e. "blame the video" rather then THE FACT it was a planned terrorist attack and Mr. Khattala had been involved daily in terrorist attacks Rice/Hillary immediately blamed the video!
Because it was less then 7 weeks from Obama's re-election.
You would think that rather then coming out with an immediate reaction "blame the video", why couldn't the WH wait till the FACTS were known?
BECAUSE of these bumper stickers which shows success in the War on Terror!
View attachment 51169

There were protests and violence all over the middle east over a video made by a criminal who never should have posted it as a result of his release.

Yet you folks CONTINUE to deny it had anything to do with what happened in Libya, as if they somehow missed it.

You folks also DIRECTLY link Al Qaeda to the attack although much of the leadership of Al Qaeda was decimated at the time.

And you folks put up a man as a candidate, who while the attack was on going, was criticizing the sitting commander in chief and trying to make the attack an election issue. Something that was unprecedented, entirely

unique and a very dangerous thing to do.

Now? After 7 investigations we have a GOP leader ADMIT, it was ENTIRELY a political ploy.

What do you do? Back to square one.

Amazing.

Perhaps you can share with us the source of this quote? "The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it's the seriousness of the charge that matters."?