You can find some through google. Of course you could check and see if your local library or nearby college library has any of his books, he wrote a lot. Other than that, you need to check education journals.
and explain to me why exactly I would do that? Is this more because Ayers' believes it Obama must believe it too? this is even thinner than the Rev Wright thing.
Its shocking that so many are caught up on "McCain said he wasn't going to attack Obama or run a negative campaign" that you excuse Obama's terrorist ties. Telling the truth is not an attack its revelation. Excusing the truth because you don't want to hear it is denial.
what is shocking to me is that the cons would pull the thinnest thread in the universe and attempt to make a mohair sweater out of it.
McCain has deeper ties to terrorists and criminals than Obama does and the fact that you ingore that is what is so ironic and disturbing.
I don't ignore Obama's relationship with William Ayers. Williams Ayers is nothing more than a former war radical who is now a respected professor at the University of IL.
What I'm curious about is, all those Republicans who sat on that board with Ayers, should the Democrats running against them in upcoming re-election bids or whatever, use the same agrument against them that is being used against Obama?
Should the argument be made that Annenberg, the founder of the foundation Obama and Ayers sat on, be seen as a terrorist pal and if so should McCain be seen as someone who pals around with friends of terrorists?
it's a strawman argument because Annenberg set up the foundation, clearly neither Annenberg nor ANY other Republican or independent had a problem sitting on a board with Ayers on it so to suggest that SOMEHOW Obama should've been the ONLY person on this board to give it some thought and by not doing so he showed poor judgement is utterly and completely ridiculous.
McCain is desparate. His supporters are desparate. This didn't work when Hillary tried it. It's not going to work now. and if by some miracle it does, then the American people get what they deserve IMO.
if a flimsy working relationship with someone who committed a crime over 40 years ago is enough to distract people from the issues facing our country good luck in the future.
I'm somewhat disgusted that there are actually people who would be satisfied winning an election this way. not because their candidate has the best plan for the country, not because he has the best temperament to be our leader, but rather because he ran the dirtiest and lowest campaign.