Mayor Pete: The next Obama?

[jwoodie]

Like then-Senator Obama, Mayor Pete has an unspoken advantage over his rivals in that any strong criticism of his candidacy could be characterized as discrimination against his special status. In the case of Obama, it was racism. In the case Mayor Pete, it will be homophobia. Will this work again?

 

[Indeependent]

Like then-Senator Obama, Mayor Pete has an unspoken advantage over his rivals in that any strong criticism of his candidacy could be characterized as discrimination against his special status. In the case of Obama, it was racism. In the case Mayor Pete, it will be homophobia. Will this work again?

All I see is a butt plug.

 

[tyroneweaver]

Will minorities hold their nose and vote for the guy?

 

[imawhosure]

Like then-Senator Obama, Mayor Pete has an unspoken advantage over his rivals in that any strong criticism of his candidacy could be characterized as discrimination against his special status. In the case of Obama, it was racism. In the case Mayor Pete, it will be homophobia. Will this work again?

No! Obama was a Senator who controlled nothing, so his edicts went along with the Dem senate votes. Mayor Pete has a record in South Bend from his edicts, and they have been pure FAILURE. Blacks in South Bend do not like the guy at ALL!

No need to worry about this until the Dems have a nominee, lol. Of course, if you want to help the Dem defeat along and live in a state that is NOT an open primary, change your status to Democrat, and vote for Bernie. Bernie is the STRONGEST for the Democratic primary, but WEAKEST in the general-)

 

[MarathonMike]

DEMS are between a rock and a hard place. The fact that a Gay mayor with a very short and very poor performance record is their leading candidate tells you how bad it is for the Donkeys. Their reliable 90% Black voting block will disintegrate as more and more Blacks are warming up to President Trump.

 

[basquebromance]

Nigel Farage: “I see a Trump landslide in November, the defeat of the hard-left in Britain in December is promising sign of things to come in America”

good luck, Mayor Buttgeek!

 

[basquebromance]

Buttigieg dominated among Iowan voters picking their second choice, so there's that

 

[The Original Tree]

Like then-Senator Obama, Mayor Pete has an unspoken advantage over his rivals in that any strong criticism of his candidacy could be characterized as discrimination against his special status. In the case of Obama, it was racism. In the case Mayor Pete, it will be homophobia. Will this work again?

He will be even more incompetent than Obama.

At least Obama was an inexperienced and often absent Senator.

The Mayor of Mayberry RFD is more qualified that Peter Buttgig.

 

[Jitss617]

What has he done ?

 

[Intolerant]

Like then-Senator Obama, Mayor Pete has an unspoken advantage over his rivals in that any strong criticism of his candidacy could be characterized as discrimination against his special status. In the case of Obama, it was racism. In the case Mayor Pete, it will be homophobia. Will this work again?

Both were fags.

 

[eagle7_31]

Buttigieg dominated among Iowan voters picking their second choice, so there's that

Mayor Pete is making an early splash, may or may not win NH, but Biden will win South Carolina. The dems will not nominate a 39 year old former Mayor of South Bend.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

Sadly, America has become an idiocracy and the snowflake idiots manipulated by the Left Glitter and propaganda are replacing the old guard at an exponentially increasing rate.

An ideological ticking time bomb.

 

[Dick Foster]

Like then-Senator Obama, Mayor Pete has an unspoken advantage over his rivals in that any strong criticism of his candidacy could be characterized as discrimination against his special status. In the case of Obama, it was racism. In the case Mayor Pete, it will be homophobia. Will this work again?

Nope! I don't think America is going to have anything to do with having a first faggot in the Whitehouse.

 

[whitehall]

The guy is an empty suit. Crooked democrats in Iowa pushed him to the head of the caucus because they were afraid of Bernie. The only thing mayor Pete has to talk about is whining about alleged discrimination about being homosexual. Victimhood ain't enough to get elected president.

 

[basquebromance]

Buttigieg dominated among Iowan voters picking their second choice, so there's that

Mayor Pete is making an early splash, may or may not win NH, but Biden will win South Carolina. The dems will not nominate a 39 year old former Mayor of South Bend.

...

when MLK said "we're gonna march for our freedoms", the KKK said "You can't do that", and he said YES WE CAN!

when folks told FDR he can't get out of the great depression, its too hard, he said YES WE CAN!

when folks told Obama a black man can never be president, he said YES WE CAN!

YES WE CAN! NOMINATE BUTTIGIEG!

YES WE CAN! KICK TRUMP'S BUTT!

YES WE CAN! OWN THIS ERA!

YES WE CAN! YES WE CAN! YES WE CAN! YES WE CAN!

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

Buttigieg dominated among Iowan voters picking their second choice, so there's that

Mayor Pete is making an early splash, may or may not win NH, but Biden will win South Carolina. The dems will not nominate a 39 year old former Mayor of South Bend.

Crystal Ball says.......
They will pick the person least valuable and easiest to forget....and Hillary will be selected as VP.
Then, something tragic or mysterious will happen to the disposable, temp Prez...finally giving Hillary the crown she bought with all those years of corruption

Well, probably not since I doubt the Dems could win an election unless it's rigged heavily.

 

[Scamp]

This is the best two the Dems can come up with. A gay man and a socialist. Pitiful ain't it?

 

[tigerred59]

Like then-Senator Obama, Mayor Pete has an unspoken advantage over his rivals in that any strong criticism of his candidacy could be characterized as discrimination against his special status. In the case of Obama, it was racism. In the case Mayor Pete, it will be homophobia. Will this work again?

All I see is a butt plug.

Ain't you tired of being on your knees...rise my dear friend and tell your boyfriend, its time for a break, your jaws are tired

 

[MACAULAY]

No chance fir Buttigig. He's a gross religious hypocrite to go along with other issues.

He is a placeholder only, to keep The Bolshevik Bern from wrapping it up, a placeholder like Uncle Joe was supposed to be---until we get to Super Tuesday when Bloomberg takes over.

It's a difficult needle to thread---to steal the nomination from the crabby old socialist and give it to the granny old billionaire (rather let him buy it) and then coax the new generation of young brainwashed Bolsheviks to come out and vote for the Granny old Billionaire.

But when you are dealing with very poorly educated people--and that's Democrats, particularly young ones--anything's possible.

Dimunitive Granny Bloomburg is you Dumb-Asses' man---get used to it

 

[Zorro!]

Like then-Senator Obama, Mayor Pete has an unspoken advantage over his rivals in that any strong criticism of his candidacy could be characterized as discrimination against his special status. In the case of Obama, it was racism. In the case Mayor Pete, it will be homophobia. Will this work again?

SORRY, MAYOR PETE: Yale Prof: Gay White Men Are Actually Symbols of Heterosexuality.

An assistant professor in women’s gender and sexuality studies at Yale University points out that Pete Buttigieg and his husband Chasten are a “vision of heterosexuality without straight people.”

The professor, Greta LaFleur, made the comments in a piece analyzing Buttigieg and his husband’s appearance on the recent Time magazine cover.

At the beginning of the piece, she speaks covers “whiteness” and how “white” the photo is. For example:

This photo also tells a profound story about whiteness, above and beyond the fact that almost everything in this photo is, itself, white. It’s such an all-consuming aesthetic, here, that it practically resists interpretation; like the generically familiar (to me, a white person) porch, the cover photo claims that there’s nothing to see, because we already know what it is. We have seen this image, we know this couple, “we” should be comfortable.​

She suggests that the apparent comfortability that the “whiteness” of the photo provides makes it a heterosexual photo: “The argument I am making, of course, is that this photo is about a lot of things, but one of its defining features is its heterosexuality,” LaFleur writes. “It’s offering us the promise that our first gay first family might actually be a straight one.”

La Fleur, who herself identifies as “queer,” goes on to explain how “the awkwardly minimal touching” between Buttigieg and his husband apparently “invokes the most uncomfortable, unfamiliar, culturally heterosexual embrace any of us have ever received,” it actually “offers a vision of heterosexuality without straight people.”

White male Buttigieg has gotten more and better press coverage than female candidates Kamala Harris and Elizabeth Warren: “And perhaps this is heterosexuality at its immaterial and strategic best, a heterosexuality that could take back the Presidency for the Democrats: white, centrist, and without women.”