Mayor Mamdani

Trump is not supporting them any more than Obama did.

The threats of total annihilation are not really considered support by anyone that is not a mindless partisan.



Do not recall having any strong emotions one way or the other.

But you sure do seem happy about the pending demise of the United States.

How long do you think the US can continue spending trillions of dollars a year on its military while running close to a 40 trillion dollar debt with a 123% debt to GDP ratio?

Trump is not supporting them any more than Obama did.


Really? They both supported them equally?

The threats of total annihilation are not really considered support by anyone that is not a mindless partisan.

We should totally annihilate their evil regime.

Do not recall having any strong emotions one way or the other.

Freeing hundreds of millions of people enslaved by the Soviets didn't invoke any strong emotions?

How long do you think the US can continue spending trillions of dollars a year on its military

Not for long.
 
Yes, as in not at all.



You cannot do that without totally annihilating the entire country.



Yet there is no end in sight.

Yes, as in not at all.

Bombing the regime has got to be helping the people more than Obama shipping the regime cash.

You cannot do that without totally annihilating the entire country.

Annihilating the IRGC would do it.

Yet there is no end in sight.

The mullahs are running out of money faster than we are.
 
Bombing the regime has got to be helping the people more than Obama shipping the regime cash.

Nope.

If a foreign adversary started to bomb the US and blew up schools and bridges, would you find that helpful in removing the current regime in the US?


Annihilating the IRGC would do it.

Which can only be accomplished by annihilating most of the population of the country.
The mullahs are running out of money faster than we are.

No, they are not. The general population might suffer but the mullahs will be fine.

Ironically the Iranian debt to GDP ratio is less than 1/3 of that of the US.

Kissing the mullahs' butts didn't help the people.

Neither does bombing the people.

You cannot force regime change, especially not with bombs and missiles.
 
Nope.

If a foreign adversary started to bomb the US and blew up schools and bridges, would you find that helpful in removing the current regime in the US?




Which can only be accomplished by annihilating most of the population of the country.


No, they are not. The general population might suffer but the mullahs will be fine.

Ironically the Iranian debt to GDP ratio is less than 1/3 of that of the US.



Neither does bombing the people.

You cannot force regime change, especially not with bombs and missiles.

Which can only be accomplished by annihilating most of the population of the country.

Why do you feel that way?

Ironically the Iranian debt to GDP ratio is less than 1/3 of that of the US.

What is their GDP per capita, ironically?

Neither does bombing the people.

That's why we bomb regime targets and not the people.

You cannot force regime change, especially not with bombs and missiles.

If you bomb enough of the military and IRGC you can.
 
Which can only be accomplished by annihilating most of the population of the country.

Why do you feel that way?

Ironically the Iranian debt to GDP ratio is less than 1/3 of that of the US.

What is their GDP per capita, ironically?

Neither does bombing the people.

That's why we bomb regime targets and not the people.

You cannot force regime change, especially not with bombs and missiles.

If you bomb enough of the military and IRGC you can.

I will be happy to answer your questions after you answer mine.

Seems reasonable.
 
Is this the bad Communism you all talk about?


 
Congratulations to New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani.



Century-old Brooklyn church destroyed in massive blaze.
1777158302128.webp

1777158353699.webp

1777158399783.webp
 
15th post
Back
Top Bottom