The hill was taken and retaking several times(sorry I was Air Cav and the movie about AirBorne not Marines...we are obviously below ya...lol)...the racism was covered as it really did happen...Doc was overeacting as did alot of people...we all worked it out as the movie showed!
Hill 937 was actually take only once, on the 10th day of battle. It cost the US 70 dead and 370 wounded compared to a
known 630 dead NVA. Don't know how y'all old folks did it back then, but when you inflict better than 8/1 dead on the enemy and hold the field after the battle nowadays it's considered a win.
And so it probably would have been had not AP correspondent William Sharbutt's overly-sensational coverage been so critical of the US military.
In EVERY account I have ever read on the operation, while racism is mentioned, it is not portrayed as being as big a factor as the movie protrays it.
In EVERY accounting I have read Sharbutt's negative media coverage IS mentioned. Just as Tet 68 had been the previous year, a resounding victory was portrayed by the media as pointless, and a defeat. Newsweek went so far as to misrepresent ALL 200+ casualties in Vietnam that week as casualties of Hamburger Hill alone, misleading the public to believe it had cost far more in US lives than it had.
The military did little to help itself. After the seige at Khe Sahn, the Marines were told a month or so later to abandon the outpost. Same thing in the A Shau Valley. The fact that the A Shau Valley was abandoned was strategically stupid, and a PR disaster to do it so soon after the media had hammered them over the battle. To the American public, this made the battles seem pointless.
Just as the Tet Offensive in 68 is always portrayed as a US defeat, so is Hamburger Hill. In both cases, they were resounding tactical victories. And in fact, where the NVA chose to make a stand and fight, the US lost more casualties at Dak To and Ia Drang.
IMO, the movie just reinforces this negative view of the US military in Vietnam; especially, in the continual questioning "why" and claiming it was pointless.
I can't imagine why any military would want to take command of the tallest mountain overlooking a valley the enemy routinely used as part of its route for supplies and men to and from North Vietnam.:duh3: