Maybe Biden did not provide the public to view the Epstein files to protect Democrats

[ElmerMudd]

How likely is it Donald Trump wants Katie Johnson's return?

Internet Revives Katie Johnson’s 2016 Lawsuit Vs Trump; Grok Asked To Fact Check

"A resurfaced tweet about Katie Johnson’s 2016 lawsuit against Donald Trump has reignited outrage online, amassing over 7 million views. Johnson had alleged Trump raped her in 1994 when she was just 13 at a party hosted by Jeffrey Epstein."

Why do you make excuses for Trump to not make the files public. We need to know if there are pedophiles who have not been held accountable. Not releasing the files is, possibly, protecting pedophiles.
If Trump is innocent he has nothing to worry about. Trump has so many law suits going on. Most he has filed, many others have filed. That should not be reason to protect pedophiles if your values are in the right place.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

How likely is it Donald Trump wants Katie Johnson's return?

Internet Revives Katie Johnson’s 2016 Lawsuit Vs Trump; Grok Asked To Fact Check

"A resurfaced tweet about Katie Johnson’s 2016 lawsuit against Donald Trump has reignited outrage online, amassing over 7 million views. Johnson had alleged Trump raped her in 1994 when she was just 13 at a party hosted by Jeffrey Epstein."

There is no Katie Johnson.

 

[georgephillip]

Why do you make excuses for Trump to not make the files public. We need to know if there are pedophiles who have not been held accountable. Not releasing the files is, possibly, protecting pedophiles.
If Trump is innocent he has nothing to worry about. Trump has so many law suits going on. Most he has filed, many others have filed. That should not be reason to protect pedophiles if your values are in the right place.

I'm sorry if I gave the impression of making excuses for Trump. I think it's likely he raped the 13 year-old in Epstein's townhouse in 1993-94; if so, he should die like Jeff.

What I was trying to point out is the Epstein files pose a similar threat to other US politicians like Bill Clinton and Israeli leaders like Ehud Barak.

By some accounts the Camp David Summit between Clinton, Barak, and Yasser Arafat in 2000 broke down unexpectedly because of blackmail on Clinton and Barak stemming from Epstein's files.

Elites like Trump, Clinton, Barak, and who knows how many other alleged pedophiles will pull every string in their possession to prevent the world from ever leaning of their crimes.

Any whistleblower revealing those crimes to the public will face a fate Daniel Ellsberg could not have imagined. imho.

 

[georgephillip]

There is no Katie Johnson.

"'Jane Doe' aka 'Katie Johnson' – 1994. Lawsuit filed June 2016, refiled October 2016 as reported by Buzzfeed and others, then dropped in November 2016.

"Jane Doe is an unnamed plaintiff, who has also gone by 'Katie Johnson' in legal papers.

"She claims she was repeatedly raped by Trump and Jeffery Epstein at Epstein’s New York City apartment in 1994, when she was 13 years old.

"A witness, also given a pseudonym — “Tiffany Doe” — said she recruited 'Jane Doe' and others. Doe, using the name 'Johnson,' gave an interview to the Daily Mail in which she said she did not know who Trump was at the time of the alleged attack but identified him later when she saw him on television."

All the assault allegations against Donald Trump, recapped

 

[EvilCat Breath]

"'Jane Doe' aka 'Katie Johnson' – 1994. Lawsuit filed June 2016, refiled October 2016 as reported by Buzzfeed and others, then dropped in November 2016.

"Jane Doe is an unnamed plaintiff, who has also gone by 'Katie Johnson' in legal papers.

"She claims she was repeatedly raped by Trump and Jeffery Epstein at Epstein’s New York City apartment in 1994, when she was 13 years old.

"A witness, also given a pseudonym — “Tiffany Doe” — said she recruited 'Jane Doe' and others. Doe, using the name 'Johnson,' gave an interview to the Daily Mail in which she said she did not know who Trump was at the time of the alleged attack but identified him later when she saw him on television."

All the assault allegations against Donald Trump, recapped

No one has ever seen her nor spoken to her. Not even her own attorneys. Not in all these lawsuits that were thrown out. After filing a lawsuit, she typically refuses to serve it. Then it gets bounced and she files another one.

I have been following this nonsense since the first filing in California. The last judge in New York stopped it. The point was to file the accusation but prohibit a response by failing to serve. The accusation is all that counts. The vapor locked brains don't need anything else.

 

[georgephillip]

No one has ever seen her nor spoken to her. Not even her own attorneys. Not in all these lawsuits that were thrown out. After filing a lawsuit, she typically refuses to serve it. Then it gets bounced and she files another one.

I have been following this nonsense since the first filing in California. The last judge in New York stopped it. The point was to file the accusation but prohibit a response by failing to serve. The accusation is all that counts. The vapor locked brains don't need anything else.

MAGA brain-farts can't imagine Donald Trump raping anyone and threatening his alleged victims' families if they report the crime.

Maybe there are videos in the Epstein files that will prove the charges one way or another?

Which deep-thinkers believe Trump would ever reveal such evidence?

ChatGPT:

"What we know:

• In 2016, an anonymous plaintiff ('Katie Johnson,' later 'Jane Doe') filed civil suits alleging Trump and Jeffrey Epstein raped her in 1994 when she was 13. The first (California, April) was dismissed for filing defects; later New York filings (June and September) were voluntarily withdrawn. No criminal charges were filed. Trump denied the allegations. WikipediaCourthouse News
• A planned Nov. 2, 2016 press conference to reveal the accuser’s identity was canceled after her lawyer (Lisa Bloom) said she received threats; the lawsuit was dropped on Nov. 4, 2016. The Guardian+1
• Reporters who dug into the filings flagged red flags around how the case surfaced and was promoted. Snopes later tied a key promoter ('Al Taylor') to former TV producer Norm Lubow, noting his role in filing and pushing the claims—something
• that undermines, but does not by itself disprove, the allegations. Snopes

"How to read this:

• "Because the cases were withdrawn before discovery or trial, there’s been no judicial test of the evidence. That leaves the claims unproven. Courthouse News
• Separate from these allegations, Trump has faced other sexual-misconduct claims; notably, a jury found him liable for sexual abuse/defamation in E. Jean Carroll’s civil cases. That outcome does not establish the truth of the Katie Johnson claims—but it’s relevant context about his broader litigation history. Wikipedia

"Bottom line: The 'Katie Johnson' accusations remain unverified and are widely regarded as weak/uncertain in credibility due to procedural problems, withdrawal before evidence could be tested, and questions about their origins.

"That said, absence of a court test also means they were never adjudicated true or false."

 

[EvilCat Breath]

MAGA brain-farts can't imagine Donald Trump raping anyone and threatening his alleged victims' families if they report the crime.

Maybe there are videos in the Epstein files that will prove the charges one way or another?

Which deep-thinkers believe Trump would ever reveal such evidence?

ChatGPT:

"What we know:

• In 2016, an anonymous plaintiff ('Katie Johnson,' later 'Jane Doe') filed civil suits alleging Trump and Jeffrey Epstein raped her in 1994 when she was 13. The first (California, April) was dismissed for filing defects; later New York filings (June and September) were voluntarily withdrawn. No criminal charges were filed. Trump denied the allegations. WikipediaCourthouse News
• A planned Nov. 2, 2016 press conference to reveal the accuser’s identity was canceled after her lawyer (Lisa Bloom) said she received threats; the lawsuit was dropped on Nov. 4, 2016. The Guardian+1
• Reporters who dug into the filings flagged red flags around how the case surfaced and was promoted. Snopes later tied a key promoter ('Al Taylor') to former TV producer Norm Lubow, noting his role in filing and pushing the claims—something
• that undermines, but does not by itself disprove, the allegations. Snopes

"How to read this:

• "Because the cases were withdrawn before discovery or trial, there’s been no judicial test of the evidence. That leaves the claims unproven. Courthouse News
• Separate from these allegations, Trump has faced other sexual-misconduct claims; notably, a jury found him liable for sexual abuse/defamation in E. Jean Carroll’s civil cases. That outcome does not establish the truth of the Katie Johnson claims—but it’s relevant context about his broader litigation history. Wikipedia

"Bottom line: The 'Katie Johnson' accusations remain unverified and are widely regarded as weak/uncertain in credibility due to procedural problems, withdrawal before evidence could be tested, and questions about their origins.

"That said, absence of a court test also means they were never adjudicated true or false."

No one has ever seen Katie Johnson nor proved, in any way that she exists. She is a fabricated construct created to file meaningless charges. There is a certain security that democrats will believe anything

 

[georgephillip]

No one has ever seen Katie Johnson nor proved, in any way that she exists. She is a fabricated construct created to file meaningless charges. There is a certain security that democrats will believe anything

Prove your claim "no one has ever seen Katie Johnson."

Anyone stupid enough to confuse Donald Trump with a populist has detached themselves from reality

The Rule of Idiots

"In the last days of all empires the idiots take over.​

"They mirror the collective stupidity of a civilization that has detached itself from reality."​

 

[struth]

Donald Trump has full authority through executive order to release the files. No crimes.

Elsberg did it without authorization.

DOJ can’t release them in the middle of sn on going case,

 

[struth]

MAGA brain-farts can't imagine Donald Trump raping anyone and threatening his alleged victims' families if they report the crime.

Maybe there are videos in the Epstein files that will prove the charges one way or another?

Which deep-thinkers believe Trump would ever reveal such evidence?

ChatGPT:

"What we know:

• In 2016, an anonymous plaintiff ('Katie Johnson,' later 'Jane Doe') filed civil suits alleging Trump and Jeffrey Epstein raped her in 1994 when she was 13. The first (California, April) was dismissed for filing defects; later New York filings (June and September) were voluntarily withdrawn. No criminal charges were filed. Trump denied the allegations. WikipediaCourthouse News
• A planned Nov. 2, 2016 press conference to reveal the accuser’s identity was canceled after her lawyer (Lisa Bloom) said she received threats; the lawsuit was dropped on Nov. 4, 2016. The Guardian+1
• Reporters who dug into the filings flagged red flags around how the case surfaced and was promoted. Snopes later tied a key promoter ('Al Taylor') to former TV producer Norm Lubow, noting his role in filing and pushing the claims—something
• that undermines, but does not by itself disprove, the allegations. Snopes

"How to read this:

• "Because the cases were withdrawn before discovery or trial, there’s been no judicial test of the evidence. That leaves the claims unproven. Courthouse News
• Separate from these allegations, Trump has faced other sexual-misconduct claims; notably, a jury found him liable for sexual abuse/defamation in E. Jean Carroll’s civil cases. That outcome does not establish the truth of the Katie Johnson claims—but it’s relevant context about his broader litigation history. Wikipedia

"Bottom line: The 'Katie Johnson' accusations remain unverified and are widely regarded as weak/uncertain in credibility due to procedural problems, withdrawal before evidence could be tested, and questions about their origins.

"That said, absence of a court test also means they were never adjudicated true or false."

Bottom line they were dismissed by the courts three times…and brought by a dembot “producer” to undermine the 2016 campaign

More abuse of the legal system by corrupt demafasict

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Prove your claim "no one has ever seen Katie Johnson."

Anyone stupid enough to confuse Donald Trump with a populist has detached themselves from reality

The Rule of Idiots

"In the last days of all empires the idiots take over.​

"They mirror the collective stupidity of a civilization that has detached itself from reality."​

Prove that no one has seen Katie Johnson. Prove a negative? Truly, democrats have taken a few steps off the curb.

 

[georgephillip]

Prove that no one has seen Katie Johnson. Prove a negative? Truly, democrats have taken a few steps off the curb.

Proving a negative depends largely on context.

In formal logic and mathematics proving a negative is often possible by showing it leads to a contradiction or by rewriting it as a logically equivalent positive statement.

In an empirical context like proving the non-existence of something in the real world it is often very difficult or practically impossible because it requires an exhaustive search.

GoogleAI.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Proving a negative depends largely on context.

In formal logic and mathematics proving a negative is often possible by showing it leads to a contradiction or by rewriting it as a logically equivalent positive statement.

In an empirical context like proving the non-existence of something in the real world it is often very difficult or practically impossible because it requires an exhaustive search.

GoogleAI.

Tough shit bringing a lawsuit then. Imaginary prople cannot sue.

 

[ElmerMudd]

DOJ can’t release them in the middle of sn on going case,

MAGA has been demanding release of the files until all of a sudden Trump, for some reason, does not want to release the file. Why.
Congress has successfully subpoened files. The truth will come out even if Trump does not want them out.

 

[struth]

MAGA has been demanding release of the files until all of a sudden Trump, for some reason, does not want to release the file. Why.
Congress has successfully subpoened files. The truth will come out even if Trump does not want them out.

Trump does want them released

He’s repeatedly stated that

But there is an on going case, so the DOJ can’t risk harming the case while it’s pending

 

[ElmerMudd]

Trump does want them released

He’s repeatedly stated that

But there is an on going case, so the DOJ can’t risk harming the case while it’s pending

How long has the investigation been going on?

 

[struth]

How long has the investigation been going on?

Maxwells conviction is on appeal

 

[ElmerMudd]

Maxwells conviction is on appeal

Why did they release the audio of Maxwell's interview with DOJ

 

[frigidweirdo]

Maybe Biden did not open up the Epstein files, to the public, to protect Democrats.

Is that not the theory of many MAGA followers who wanted the files to be made public. It may be someone who is not a politician Biden wanted to protect. One of those deep state deals.

Biden did not make the files public.

Let's open up the files and see who Biden may have been trying to protect.

Trump is a part of the same elite that Biden was serving. Neither of them was going to release such files, for the rich do not wish it.

The rich are your controllers.

 

[struth]

Why did they release the audio of Maxwell's interview with DOJ

That and the massive amounts they released already isn’t relevant to the on going case

But you bring up a good point they have released a lot