Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Watch the video, dolt.What is it a nation of then, if not immigrants, OP?
You aren't able to sum it up?Watch the video, dolt.
Same thing I have said for years: We are a nation of settlers and colonizers. And there is nothing to be ashamed of that. They built a nation on their own, with savage Indians attacking them.You aren't able to sum it up?
.What is it a nation of then, if not immigrants, OP?
.Same thing I have said for years: We are a nation of settlers and colonizers. And there is nothing to be ashamed of that. They built a nation on their own, with savage Indians attacking them.
They want to claim all the land was owned by Indians, yet there only about 7 million for the entire lands of USA and Canada. The vast majority of the land was not occupied by anyone.
That is a straight up lie.America isn’t a nation of immigrants
.That is a straight up lie.
And you know it too.
That is not an opinion, son. It's a fact..
Thanks for sharing your opinion.
Please pardon us if we don't value it as much as you do.
.
.That is not an opinion, son. It's a fact.
I realize you can't tell the difference though, so I don't hold it against you.
.
Thanks for sharing more of your opinions.
Although your opinion that I am your son is sort of bizarre.
.
It was never used as a canard.A "nation of immigrates" has always been a canard after the first generation of legal US Citizens are born here.
.
And we have heard over and over that the concept of "owning the land" was totally abstract and foreign to the indians.
How can one be robbed of that which one does not own?
.
The guilting agenda is getting old. Especially since the whole western hemisphere is of most people from other parts of the planet in the DNA of various percentages of inhabitants.
Oh boy, this one has set off the left, who love to whine and cry about racism and how America “stole” land from the Natives.
Well, here is Matt Walsh’s defense of that statement: