Matt Taibbi lays out why Liberals are destroying Free Speech

True---for the military---at the time. That has been rectified. Now address the healthcare workers that you conveeeeeniently didn't address. LOL, morons.
What about them? They have a contract with the government so the government sets the rules.

Don’t like it? Don’t take the government cheese.
 
They have a contract with the government so the government sets the rules.
There are no contracted nurses in my area, but I live in a democrat state where personal constitutional rights are not recognized. Now run along, I'm done wasting my time with your typical trolling lies, Moron-er.
 
There are no contracted nurses in my area, but I live in a democrat state where personal constitutional rights are not recognized. Now run along, I'm done wasting my time with your typical trolling lies, Moron-er.
So they have a problem with their employer.

They could go on strike then
 
it means they’re employees, which means they can go on strike if they don’t like what their employer does.
Non union employees don't go on strike. If they do--it is called non report and they are fired, which was exactly what happened to them if they refused the vax. Now stop with the off topic derailing. The topic is "Matt Taibbi lays out why Liberals are destroying Free Speech" Get on topic, STFU or GTFOH or be reported, troll.
 
Non union employees don't go on strike. If they do--it is called non report and they are fired, which was exactly what happened to them if they refused the vax. Now stop with the off topic derailing. The topic is "Matt Taibbi lays out why Liberals are destroying Free Speech" Get on topic, STFU or GTFOH or be reported, troll.
Ah, score one for the evil corporate oligarchs then.
 
No, score one for the fascist globalist democrats that are doing their level best to destroy constitutional rights.
You and Taibbi are similar in that you don’t understand what the constitution provides.

It doesn’t provide a right to work as a nurse for a company that doesn’t business with the government without complying with the government rules.

It doesn’t provide a right to shitpost on Twitter if Twitter doesn’t want you to.
 
You and Taibbi are similar in that you don’t understand what the constitution provides.

It doesn’t provide a right to work as a nurse for a company that doesn’t business with the government without complying with the government rules.

It doesn’t provide a right to shitpost on Twitter if Twitter doesn’t want you to.
Wrong. Typical ignorant democrat. That is exactly why the military members were paid back pay and given the opportunity to serve after their rights were denied. LOL, SMFH.
 
Is scientific truth dependent on majority consensus? Have you ever heard of Harland Bretz? I correctly theorized that the Channeled Scablands had been formed by a monster dam break, not by slow erosion which was the most commonly accepted theory at the time. Bretz was laughed to scorn for more than 50 years until new sattellite technology and improvements in analyzing geological data proved him right. He was awarded the highest honor given by the Geological Society of America in 1979 at the age of 96.

No, majority opinions among scientists are never something to use to support scientific theories.
Science is a self-correcting process generally trending toward truth.
 
Wrong again--
Military members have been allowed to refuse vaccinations since the COVID-19 vaccine mandate was rescinded on January 10, 2023. This change followed legal challenges and the enactment of the 2023 National Defense Authorization Act.
nclalegal.org
The White House
my post didn’t say anything about the military, dope.



Notably both cases overturned the notoriously stupid 5th circuit.
 
LOL, Again, typical ignorant democrat that thinks he knows more than the courts. Please link to your degree in constitutional law. Moron.
The 5th circuit was overruled in both cases by SCOTUS.

They’re political hacks.

Do you know more than SCOTUS? Because they said you’re full of shit.
 
15th post
So the $200,000 was the minimum, got it.


No, Dems voted for Hill, it was the undecided that were the targets.


Didn't your mother tell you never answer a question with a question?

So the $200,000 was the minimum, got it.

$200,000 overrode Hillary's $1.2 billion in advertising? Nice!
 
Doesn’t matter if you’re vaccinated or not, people could spread covid with out having symptoms.
yes, but lessening symptoms through vaxing made it much more prevalent
 
Back
Top Bottom