Matt Taibbi lays out why Liberals are destroying Free Speech

[alang1216]

Al Gore took the data and declared that NY City would be flooded by 20' of water by 2013. That is typical of hair-on-fire global warming alarmists who tend to misread the facts and data leading then to mislead millions of people into unfounded fears of global catastrophism.

View attachment 1258270


View attachment 1258271

View attachment 1258272

View attachment 1258273

View attachment 1258274


View attachment 1258275


View attachment 1258276

News flash, Gore is NOT a scientist, he is a politician. You're welcome.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

How so?


It does.


That's fine but I was hoping the US would still be a superpower in 100 years, not some 2nd rate power at the mercy of others.

How so?

Why would we want to waste trillions reducing CO2 emissions if 90% of the warming is natural?

That's fine but I was hoping the US would still be a superpower in 100 years,

One way to remain a superpower is to have cheap reliable energy for the next 100 years.

How is the UK's and Germany's green idiocy helping out their economy, military and all-around power?

 

[alang1216]

Are you saying Russian disinformation had no effect on any US voters?

Literally dozens of Dems voted for Trump because of Russian memes on Facebook.

FACT CHECK: Russian Interference Went Far Beyond 'Facebook Ads' Kushner Described​

How about the hacking of the DNC emails?

That was awful!

The corruption of Hillary and the DNC must never be exposed.

The corruption of Hillary and the DNC must always remain hidden.

But they were exposed. Why? Who benefited?

 

[pknopp]

These are the facts.

Everything that happened, including the "forced vaccines" as the OP put it, happened under Trump's regime.

Nearly everything MAGA condemns, Trump has done.

 

[alang1216]

Popular narratives are rarely without flaws. Global warming and global cooling narratives have many serious flaws.

Flaws? Of course. Serious flaws would be bad data. Minor flaws would be incorrect theories about the data.

 

[alang1216]

Here's what God said about the weather and climate:

Genesis 8:22
While the earth remaineth, seedtime and harvest, and cold and heat, and summer and winter, and day and night shall not cease.

Not 'cease' or not change?

 

[alang1216]

Evolution has long been commonly accepted by secularists with no desire to research or answer scientific contradictions to Darwin's assumptions.

Sorry but that battle has been fought and evolution has prevailed. If you don't like the God works, take it up with him when you meet.

 

[alang1216]

Both. Did reputable scientists claim the earth had been cooling for hundreds of years or was that a reported claim never proposed or presented by any reputable scientist as a scientific claim?

Studies in the 1970s supporting a global cooling theory were in the minority. A Facebook post claims the majority of climate scientists hypothesised the earth was cooling and an ice age was imminent half a century ago. Is that your source?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

FACT CHECK: Russian Interference Went Far Beyond 'Facebook Ads' Kushner Described​

But they were exposed. Why? Who benefited?

As to the amount of money expended on Facebook ads, the company said Russian operatives did spend less than $200,000 on advertising on the platform — but that doesn't account for the organic content the operatives created and shared.

Lots of Dems fell for Russian propaganda. Some things never change.

But they were exposed. Why? Who benefited?

Who benefitted from the dems stealing the nomination from Bernie and handing it to Hillary?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Nearly everything MAGA condemns, Trump has done.

Trump did Hillary and Kamala?

Ewwwww!

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Flaws? Of course. Serious flaws would be bad data. Minor flaws would be incorrect theories about the data.

A serious flaw would be wasting trillions of dollars to reduce temperatures in the year 2100 by 0.1 degree.

 

[markef]

Democrats just need to turn their party back to God.

 

[markef]

So where do you get your information and your memes from?

I am subscribed to more than a dozen well known news outlets, including a few very liberal ones. Some sites provide a weekly assortment of memes. I also search science journals, Wiki sites and others for hard-to-find facts and information.

 

[markef]

Its your claim that needs backing up.

Prove that Epps was a plant by the Dems.

I don't have to prove it. He was caught on film inciting violence and democrats refused to arrest him for months.

 

[Marener]

I am subscribed to more than a dozen well known news outlets, including a few very liberal ones. Some sites provide a weekly assortment of memes. I also search science journals, Wiki sites and others for hard-to-find facts and information.

Credible news outlets don’t traffic in memes.

 

[markef]

Dominion banked over three quarter of a billion dollar from Faux Not News for lies like those.

There was a Republican district that forgot to update their software for the new election. It was an easy fix.

Dominion never proved its machines were not manipulated and corrupted regardless of why Fox News paid damages.

 

[Marener]

I don't have to prove it. He was caught on film inciting violence and democrats refused to arrest him for months.

But you do have to prove it, because it’s your claim.

What news outlet did you get this information from because it’s completely fabricated.

 

[Marener]

Dominion never proved its machines were not manipulated and corrupted regardless of why Fox News paid damages.

Hand recounts proved that tabulators were perfectly accurate.

 

[markef]

Dominion banked over three quarter of a billion dollar from Faux Not News for lies like those.

There was a Republican district that forgot to update their software for the new election. It was an easy fix.

Before the 2020 election many prominent democrats claimed voting machines were vulnerable to hacking but all changed their tune after the machines were hacked in 2020 to democrat advantage.

Flashback: Democrats Said Voting Machines Can Be Hacked, Votes Can Be Switched

Flashback: Democrats Said Voting Machines Can Be Hacked, Votes Can Be Switched

By Taylor Penley July 19, 2021 at 3:09pm

Most of us remember the baseless Russian hacking claims that shaped the Democratic Party platform following the 2016 election that (for the most part) vanished after a 2019 Senate Intelligence Committee report found “no indications that votes were changed, vote-tallying systems were manipulated, or that any voter registration data was altered or deleted.”

But here we are again, reflecting on the “impossible” voting machine vulnerability that Democrats once touted as a possibility — a reality, even.

Take a look at this damning video tweet from activist Jack Posobiec that compiles opinions from various Democratic officials who once preached the possibility of hacked voting machines.

“I continue to think that our voting machines are too vulnerable,” Rep. Adam Schiff of California said.

“The biggest seller of voting machines is doing something that violates cybersecurity 101,” Oregon Sen. Ron Wyden argued later in the clip, “directing that you install remote access software which would make a thing like that — you know — a magnet for fraudsters and hackers.”

Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar — who was also among the slew of Democrats eager to become the party’s 2020 nominee — also joined in on the “conspiracy.”

“You could easily hack into [voting machines]. It makes it seem like all these states are doing different things, but, in fact, three companies are controlling [elections].”

The real kicker is then-Sen. Kamala Harris’ repeated appearances throughout the video.

It’s incredibly ironic considering the contention surrounding her assumed role as “second in command.”

“There are a lot of states that are dealing with antiquated machines, right? Which are vulnerable to being hacked,” Harris said in one segment.

“I actually held a demonstration for my colleagues here at the Capitol where we brought in folks who — before our eyes — hacked election machines, those that are being used in many states,” she added in a separate piece.

It’s a vastly different angle from the one we’re accustomed to now, isn’t it?

I’ll admit that perhaps we should have listened to the possibility of hacked machines after the 2016 election.

After all, Republicans had nothing to hide back then — just as the left should have nothing to hide now.

 

[markef]

Thanks you've answered my question as why these subjects are political, namely people can't tell the difference between a politician and a scientist.

Politicians have been the loudest proponents of flawed science.