Matt Taibbi lays out why Liberals are destroying Free Speech

But it was the riot at the Capitol that was a scene of a crime. Benedict Donald was the one person most responsible the riot that day. He called his MOB to DC that specific day and sent them specifically to the Capitol, with the message "We fight. We fight like hell and if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore!" Once he became aware of his MOB's actions at the Capitol, he did nothing to stop the attack for hours. Had he immediately protected the Capitol from his riotous MOB, Ashley Babbitt might still be alive.
The fact that Ray Epps was filmed inciting violence that day but was not prosecuted was because, as uncovered evidence later showed, democrats had hundreds of operatives in the crowd that day deliberately inciting violence. That proved the violence that day was organized and perpetrated by paid leftists, not Trump supporters.
 
The fact that Ray Epps was filmed inciting violence that day but was not prosecuted was because, as uncovered evidence later showed, democrats had hundreds of operatives in the crowd that day deliberately inciting violence. That proved the violence that day was organized and perpetrated by paid leftists, not Trump supporters.
Delusional.
 
These are the facts.

Everything that happened, including the "forced vaccines" as the OP put it, happened under Trump's regime.
Those who blame Trump for anything covid prove their ignorance and bias.
 
Explain why Epps wasn't touched until prosecutors got so exposed and embarrassed they finally had to toss a light charge at him.
Go ahead.
I dare you.
What should have he been prosecuted for? He didn’t go in the Capitol. He didn’t fight any officer.
 
What should have he been prosecuted for? He didn’t go in the Capitol. He didn’t fight any officer.
Well hundreds of people were prosecuted for exactly the same non acts.
Sounds like an inside job to me. Lots of footage of Epps exhorting the crowd to charge the Capitol. Blatantly encouraging it.
 
No.
The day of.
You're lying.
And of course I don't have a name. There were HUNDREDS.
You're a fraud just like your fraud party.
I don’t need hundreds. Just name one.

And while you’re at it, show us the video of him encouraging violence the day of.

You can’t and you won’t. You’ll just whine and run away.
 
Democrats blocked all but 2 investigations into Dominion voting machines even though democrats admitted in 2019 that the machines were vulnerable to being corrupted. One machine in Michigan, examined after courts forced democrats to allow the examination, was found to have flipped thousands of votes from Trump to Biden.

The other machine was examined and found corrupted by Tina Peters and democrats sentenced her to 9 years in prison for examining the machine.

That does not prove there was no voting machine fraud. That proves democrats did not want the machines examined even in order to prove the machines had not been corrupted nationwide and that democrats were willing to fight like the devil to keep that fact hidden. Sentencing Peters to 9 years in prison is a strong indication that Dominion machines were widely corrupted.
Dominion banked over three quarter of a billion dollar from Faux Not News for lies like those.

There was a Republican district that forgot to update their software for the new election. It was an easy fix.
 
You commies could not even FAKE you wanted EPPS punished. You suspected he was cooperating with or was a Fed.

ON VIDEO....A GUY DRIPPING IN MAGA GEAR DEMANDING TO BREACH THE CAPITOL AND THE COMMIES WERE SILENT. :auiqs.jpg:
 
15th post
Anyone claiming global warmings is real or not real based on feelings and not facts is not trustworthy. I have studied the issue extensively and am completely convinced the global warming narratives are bunk.
I respect that, I don't agree with your conclusion, but I respect your opinion.
 
so then are the three leading scientists on climate change...Al Gore, John Kerry, and the real brains behind the 'movement' greta just wasting their/our time?
Thanks you've answered my question as why these subjects are political, namely people can't tell the difference between a politician and a scientist.
 
Doesn't matter now does it?

If the warming without us is 90% of the total, I think that matters. A lot.
How so?

Fact: the earth contains a finite amount of hydrocarbons so it seems likely we'll have to find alternate energy sources at some point in the future.

Nuclear makes sense.
It does.

When that happens, do we want to find the Chinese have cornered the market on solar cells, EVs, and wind power?

Buying their super tech in 100 years is always possible.
That's fine but I was hoping the US would still be a superpower in 100 years, not some 2nd rate power at the mercy of others.
 
Back
Top Bottom