Matt Gaetz on Twitter

[Dante]

You again. Gaetz will be on OAN. He is leaving politics behind.

David Firestone has an insightful column in today's (12.31/2024) newspaper (NYT) - The Trumpian Attitude at the Heart of the Gaetz Report

quotes:
There is so much repellently sleazy behavior documented in the House Ethics Committee report about Matt Gaetz that a reader has to stop every few pages to look away and focus on what still seems astounding: This is the man that Donald Trump wanted to be the attorney general of the United States, the highest-ranking law enforcement official in the land, the leader of the Department of Justice.

Trump wanted to give that position to a man who paid at least half a dozen women for sex, according to the report, which was made public on Monday. And the violation of Florida’s prostitution law isn’t even the real depravity; the committee took pains to detail the underlying implication of his actions: “Representative Gaetz took advantage of the economic vulnerability of young women to lure them into sexual activity for which they received an average of a few hundred dollars after each encounter.”

...

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

We didn’t need any further confirmation of your inability to make valid distinctions.

What you have is nothing. Claims that he committed statutory rape which don’t bother to weigh in the fact that the age of consent makes it impossible.

You studiously insist on missing the point.

And you’re too gutless to concede your own massive mistakes.

Would you hire someone for whom a background investigation claimed to have credible evidence of drug abuse and statutory rape?

Of course your answer is "no" and so that proves my point.

 

[Dante]

We didn’t need any further confirmation of your inability to make valid distinctions.

What you have is nothing. Claims that he committed statutory rape which don’t bother to weigh in the fact that the age of consent makes it impossible.

You studiously insist on missing the point.

And you’re too gutless to concede your own massive mistakes.

one more fail...

...from USMB's infamous welsher of bets

Liability/Ilar/BackAgain

 

[Dante]

Would you hire someone for whom a background investigation claimed to have credible evidence of drug abuse and statutory rape?

Of course your answer is "no" and so that proves my point.

Wait...

for the

dance, dance, dance


Liability Dances Like Few Others

 

[BackAgain]

Stop playing make believe again. You are not in a courtroom (not that you have ever really been in one -- as counsel), and "innocent until proven guilty" is only in a court of law where an accused is on trial.

Every day, people get away (legally) with crimes they've committed

Holy shit. Just when we thought that the dainty couldn’t dive any deeper into the depths of his cesspool.

I already noted that guilt requires proof. Mere allegations aren’t sufficient.

And the fact that people get away with crimes doesn’t establish either that a person accused is still presumed to be innocent.

Let’s talk about some random scumbag asshole. You’ll serve for that. Let’s say you are accused of some criminal behavior. The fact that you have been accused doesn’t make you guilty, you moron. You might actually be guilty. But that’s a different matter.

What if you are actually innocent of the commission of that crime? Would the fact that someone else accused you of being guilty make you guilty? No. Hell, even a turd like you should agree.

Did Gaetz fuck a young woman? Maybe. I don’t know. But if he did have consensual sex with a 17 year old young woman in NY State, then he’s not guilty of rape.

I know that actual facts disturb your petty little mind. But that’s doesn’t change them, the dainty.

 

[BackAgain]

one more fail...

View attachment 1059921

Ah. A false declaration of failure by a world class lying libturd.

Sorry, the dainty. But you remain nothing but a filthy discredited lying sack of pus.

 

[Dante]

Holy shit. Just when we thought that the dainty couldn’t dive any deeper into the depths of his cesspool.

I already noted that guilt requires proof. Mere allegations aren’t sufficient.

And the fact that people get away with crimes doesn’t establish either that a person accused is still presumed to be innocent.

Let’s talk about some random scumbag asshole. You’ll serve for that. Let’s say you are accused of some criminal behavior. The fact that you have been accused doesn’t make you guilty, you moron. You might actually be guilty. But that’s a different matter.

What if you are actually innocent of the commission of that crime? Would the fact that someone else accused you of being guilty make you guilty? No. Hell, even a turd like you should agree.

Did Gaetz fuck a young woman? Maybe. I don’t know. But if he did have consensual sex with a 17 year old young woman in NY State, then he’s not guilty of rape.

I know that actual facts disturb your petty little mind. But that’s doesn’t change them, the dainty.

sigh

must we go down this road again?

Old man -- change your adult diapers, willya

Dear Lt. General Obvious, we ALL know Gatez hasn't been charged in a court of law --

and you are still to this day, not in one either

Dance ... dance ... dace

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

David Firestone has an insightful column in today's (12.31/2024) newspaper (NYT) - The Trumpian Attitude at the Heart of the Gaetz Report

quotes:
There is so much repellently sleazy behavior documented in the House Ethics Committee report about Matt Gaetz that a reader has to stop every few pages to look away and focus on what still seems astounding: This is the man that Donald Trump wanted to be the attorney general of the United States, the highest-ranking law enforcement official in the land, the leader of the Department of Justice.

Trump wanted to give that position to a man who paid at least half a dozen women for sex, according to the report, which was made public on Monday. And the violation of Florida’s prostitution law isn’t even the real depravity; the committee took pains to detail the underlying implication of his actions: “Representative Gaetz took advantage of the economic vulnerability of young women to lure them into sexual activity for which they received an average of a few hundred dollars after each encounter.”

...

It is truly sickening to see the degree to which some people here are willing to go to defend Gaetz here. There is really nothing to defend, he's unfit and that's that.

It is even more sickening and worrying, that Trump also was unconcerned about this conduct, it shows (like we need more evidence) just how utterly incompetent and dangerous Donald Trump is.

I suspect most of the Gaetz defenders are only doing it because it is Trump they are really defending. If Gaetz is a drug fueled sexual abuser then that makes Trump look bad, so lets deny every claim about Gaetz and keep the circus running smoothly.

 

[Dante]

Ah. A false declaration of failure by a world class lying libturd.

Sorry, the dainty. But you remain nothing but a filthy discredited lying sack of pus.

search: Liability IlarMeilyr BackAgain


Liability has a history of lying. He even used an anagram: ILAR MEILYR = Liar Meilyr when he first came back, after vowing he would not do so. Gotta give you credit. You keep getting up and stumble around spouting the same shit.


https://www.usmessageboard.com/threads/usmb-baby-reindeer-explained.1104263/#post-34539973


BackAgain Happiest of New Year wishes for you. Can't think of a bigger loser that truly needs them -- happiest wishes.

 

[BackAgain]

David Firestone has an insightful column in today's (12.31/2024) newspaper (NYT) - The Trumpian Attitude at the Heart of the Gaetz Report

quotes:
There is so much repellently sleazy behavior documented in the House Ethics Committee report about Matt Gaetz that a reader has to stop every few pages to look away and focus on what still seems astounding: This is the man that Donald Trump wanted to be the attorney general of the United States, the highest-ranking law enforcement official in the land, the leader of the Department of Justice.

Trump wanted to give that position to a man who paid at least half a dozen women for sex, according to the report, which was made public on Monday. And the violation of Florida’s prostitution law isn’t even the real depravity; the committee took pains to detail the underlying implication of his actions: “Representative Gaetz took advantage of the economic vulnerability of young women to lure them into sexual activity for which they received an average of a few hundred dollars after each encounter.”

...

The dainty cites mere opinion as evidence to support his own preconceived imbecile views.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

It's also beyond hypocrisy to attack Hunter Biden for drug use and prostitution while turning a blind eye to Gaetz's largely equivalent conduct.

 

[Dante]

It is truly sickening to see the degree to which some people here are willing to go to defend Gaetz here. There is really nothing to defend, he's unfit and that's that.

It is even more sickening and worrying, that Trump also was unconcerned about this conduct, it shows (like we need more evidence) just how utterly incompetent and dangerous Donald Trump is.

Disturbing

I remember when the GOP scored big with the bs moral high-ground (it was all disgusting as the House members attacking Clinton had closets full of shit themselves), with putting Clinton's sex life into the congressional record

Now we have the Trumpian morality play (clue: few to no morals matter):

Matt Gaetz - Trumpian Attitude at the Heart of the Gaetz Report

 

[BackAgain]

sigh

must we go down this road again?

Old man -- change your adult diapers, willya

Dear Lt. General Obvious, we ALL know Gatez hasn't been charged in a court of law --

and you are still to this day, not in one either

Dance ... dance ... dace

I’m glad you recognize that this isn’t a court of law. Surprised, but glad.

That never was a question, though.

The actual topic, you turd, is whether there is any credible evidence that Gaetz ever fucked a minor.

I realize you often have massive difficulty staying on topic. But, try.

 

[Dante]

It's also beyond hypocrisy to attack Hunter Biden for drug use and prostitution while turning a blind eye to Gaetz's largely equivalent conduct.

B-i-n-g-o!

 

[Dante]

Let's try and keep on topic. But before I steer clear of the House Troll:

https://www.usmessageboard.com/threads/usmb-baby-reindeer-explained.1104263/#post-34539973

the one who shall be ignored upon seeing his scream name

 

[BackAgain]

search: Liability IlarMeilyr BackAgain


Liability has a history of lying. He even used an anagram: ILAR MEILYR = Liar Meilyr when he first came back, after vowing he would not do so. Gotta give you credit. You keep getting up and stumble around spouting the same shit.


https://www.usmessageboard.com/threads/usmb-baby-reindeer-explained.1104263/#post-34539973

Entirely off topic. Trolling. Baiting. Deflecting.

The dainty loves to only violate the rules. And for some reason, he seems to get away with it.

In any event, it is the dainty who is the liar.

 

[BackAgain]

B-i-n-g-o!

Nope. Just another baseless claim. So, of course, you clap like the organ grinder’s monkey.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

BackAgain

Would you object if you had an adult daughter and you discovered she had started dating Matt Gaetz?

Don't lie now, like that CHATgpt you were so interested in...

After all, as you keep pointing out, he's not been convicted of any crimes...

Interactive AI is dishonest

I found that entertaining. I also am curious if it’s real or just a creative use of videography? If taken at face value, it suggests that there is a programmed effort to make sure that AI can default to dishonesty. The motive for that? I’m not sure. Worthy of some thought.

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[BackAgain]

BackAgain

Would you object if you had an adult daughter and you discovered she had started dating Matt Gaetz?

Don't lie now, like that CHATgpt you were so interested in...

After all he's not been convicted of any crimes...

Interactive AI is dishonest

I found that entertaining. I also am curious if it’s real or just a creative use of videography? If taken at face value, it suggests that there is a programmed effort to make sure that AI can default to dishonesty. The motive for that? I’m not sure. Worthy of some thought.

www.usmessageboard.com

Let me remind you yet again, you scumbag, the rules forbid your making family references.

Show me actual evidence that Gaetz ever fucked an underage person, and then we can have the discussion on a fair minded basis.

I leave the lying to shitstains like you and Procrusty StretchedAnus.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Let me remind you yet again, you scumbag, the rules forbid your making family references.

Show me actual evidence that Gaetz ever fucked an underage person, and then we can have the discussion on a fair minded basis.

https://ethics.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Committee-Report.pdf