And? Until just now I have never heard of this organization. They seem to trigger you.
Explain your love for Hamas
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And? Until just now I have never heard of this organization. They seem to trigger you.
Uh huh. Although your reply was as to a person other than the one under actual discussion. You’re an assclown.I know Gaetz was never tried I was referring to Trump, Gaetz's mentor.
Wrong, ass breath. In NY the age of majority for purposes of consent to sexual relations is 17.A 17 year old is not an adult, she's a child, a girl, not a "woman" you devious sick bastard.
Allegations aren’t proof. And one can’t commit statutory rape (on the basis of the age of the parties) where both are of legal age. You dunce.The ethics committee found substantial evidence he committed statutory rape.
He did bow out. That’s all you know. The breaths you mere speculation under the guise of “fact.” Once again, turds like you don’t sweat any details and you don’t care about actual facts or the law.Gaetz bowed out, ran away because he knows that too many people believed the allegations.
Nope. The “House” offered some opinions but, like you, their opinions ignore the law.That's their duty, it doesn't matter if he was convicted or not, the house have standards and they trust the ethics committee and its findings.
Gaetz was tried in the court of public opinion and found guilty. Everybody thinks he's a sleazeball unfit for high office.Matt is capable of defending himself. Too bad Hunter Biden was not capable. Good that Hunter had the daddy who pardoned him.
We want to hear from Democrats who think Daddy was right to pardon his own son?
First hear from Gaetz.
Post
See new posts
Conversation
Matt Gaetz
@mattgaetz
Subscribe
Well there is this![]()
Quote
![]()
𝐃𝐁 𝐂𝐨𝐨𝐩𝐞𝐫 𝕋𝕏
@DBCooperTX
·
Dec 25
Replying to @abc13houston
I’m no Gaetz fan, but his main accuser here appears to be in prison for falsely accusing someone else of this same stuff.![]()
Uh huh. Although your reply was as to a person other than the one under actual discussion. You’re an assclown.
Wrong, ass breath. In NY the age of majority for purposes of consent to sexual relations is 17.
See above snippet.The question is not for you to decide. It’s already determined.
Allegations aren’t proof. And one can’t commit statutory rape (on the basis of the age of the parties) where both are of legal age. You dunce.
I believe the ethics committee not Gaetz.He did bow out. That’s all you know. The breaths you mere speculation under the guise of “fact.” Once again, turds like you don’t sweat any details and you don’t care about actual facts or the law.
Nope. The “House” offered some opinions but, like you, their opinions ignore the law.
Did Gaetz behave improperly? You weren’t there. You don’t know. You persist in substituting your mere speculation or the mere opinions of others.
Don't forget to close the gaet behind you on your way out.You’re a very shallow & lightweight little troll, Hemlock Homeless.
Some people here like Twat Again, admire scum like Gaetz, they get excited at the idea of a child being screwed by sleaze bags, it excites them, that's why Trump excites them.Gaetz was tried in the court of public opinion and found guilty. Everybody thinks he's a sleazeball unfit for high office.
Those people weren't raised right and that let to low moral standards. They probably don't even know what you are talking about.Some people here like Twat Again, admire scum like Gaetz, they get excited at the idea of a child being screwed by sleaze bags, it excites them, that's why Trump excites them.
Better than a prejudgmental idiot lowlife such as you.View attachment 1059899
Looks like you'd not make a very good ethics committee member.
Bite my ass.See above snippet.
Nobody cares what a simpleton like you chooses to believe.I believe the ethics committee not Gaetz.
Don’t forget gfy.Don't forget to close the gaet behind you on your way out.
False. I just don’t presume guilt in the way you scumbags always do.Some people here like Again, admire scum like Gaetz,
No. That’s just you projecting.they get excited at the idea of a child being screwed by sleaze bags,
Nah. Truth, fairness and reality are far more fulfilling to most of us. Not to vermin like you.it excites them, that's why Trump excites them.
They're all over the forum and I regularly put them in their place, they eventually shut up once they realize they can't fool Sherlock Holmes.Those people weren't raised right and that let to low moral standards. They probably don't even know what you are talking about.
Trump actually convinced em that he's sleazy for THEIR benefit.They're all over the forum and I regularly put them in their place, they eventually shut up once they realize they can't fool Sherlock Holmes.
But seriously, yes, it is pretty disturbing that we have a President (soon) who epitomizes sleaze and criminality and that so many little people want to applaud him.
You want to believe Gaetz over the ethics committee, why did you do that?False. I just don’t presume guilt in the way you scumbags always do.
You chose to use the term "woman" when referring to a child, that disturbs me.No. That’s just you projecting.
Do you think the ethics committee members are all liars?Nah. Truth, fairness and reality are far more fulfilling to most of us. Not to vermin like you.
Yes, they have been hoodwinked and sooner or later it will dawn on them how stupid they've been. He's going to fuck up the United States and they will see no benefits from their vote for him, they will gain absolutely nothing form this, but they are too stupid to grasp this yet.Trump actually convinced em that he's sleazy for THEIR benefit.
The ethics committee made some determinations. It wasn’t a trial. There was no cross examination.You want to believe Gaetz over the ethics committee, why did you do that?
I couldn’t care less what disturbs you.You chose to use the term "woman" when referring to a child, that disturbs me.
Nope. But neither do I imagine that their willingness to accuse thereby becomes an institute for actual evidence or proof of guilt.Do you think the ethics committee members are all liars?
Where did I say it was a trial?The ethics committee made some determinations. It wasn’t a trial. There was no cross examination.
I choose to believe the ethics committee, they are there for a purpose.Why is it that you insist on a presumption of guilt for a person whose political views you merely disagree with? You’re a hack.
As an American shouldn't that have been "I could care less"I couldn’t care less what disturbs you.
She is a woman at 17. So, facts bother you. Tough shit.
I am now wondering whether you actually are Matt Gaetz, it would explain a great deal of your posts here.Nope. But neither do I imagine that their willingness to accuse thereby becomes an institute for actual evidence or proof of guilt.
You’re in miles over your pinhead, Shitstain Hemlock.
Where did I say it was a trial?
You choose to “believe” mere accusations? Ok. But then, don’t couch them as facts, you gerbil.I choose to believe the ethics committee, they are there for a purpose.
No. As a matter of idiom, it could be either. Try to spend many nights worried about it, you sniveling twit.As an American shouldn't that have been "I could care less"
I can’t help your ignorance.View attachment 1059911
How old is the "woman" in your life I wonder...
I am now wondering whether you actually are Matt Gaetz, it would explain a great deal of your posts here.
Wow.Some people here like Twat Again, admire scum like Gaetz, they get excited at the idea of a child being screwed by sleaze bags, it excites them, that's why Trump excites them.
If you ever had a proper job you'd know all about background investigations (as an immigrant I've been subject to very thorough background checks by the FBI and Interpol). If you were hiring a person and a background investigation found reasonable evidence of a crime pertaining to drugs and rape but not enough for a criminal trial, would you be happy to hire that person?You didn’t you retard. That’s the point. Absent a trial, there can be no possible conviction. Damn; you’re a fucking asshole.
You choose to “believe” mere accusations? Ok. But then, don’t couch them as facts, you gerbil.
No. As a matter of idiom, it could be either. Try to spend many nights worried about it, you sniveling twit.
I can’t help your ignorance.
And try to avoid invoking any family, you rancid twat.
![]()
Stop playing make believe again. You are not in a courtroom (not that you have ever really been in one -- as counsel), and "innocent until proven guilty" is only in a court of law where an accused is on trial.I’m not you, asshole.
Thank God.
It is way past time for even a dope lke you to grasped the obvious difference between actual guilt and a mere unsubstantiated allegation.
He's a bumbling, mumbling imbecile - a great feet to accomplish, being as he is , an anonymous internet message board troll.So let's clear this up NOW.
You, BackAgain , believe that Gaetzis innocent.... never fucked a teenager, nor paid for her SEX, Nor traveled across State Lines.
We didn’t need any further confirmation of your inability to make valid distinctions.If you ever had a proper job you'd know all about background investigations (as an immigrant I've been subject to very thorough background checks by the FBI and Interpol). If you were hiring a person and a background investigation found reasonable evidence of a crime pertaining to drugs and rape but not enough for a criminal trial, would you be happy to hire that person?