Matt Gaetz on Twitter

I know Gaetz was never tried I was referring to Trump, Gaetz's mentor.
Uh huh. Although your reply was as to a person other than the one under actual discussion. You’re an assclown.
A 17 year old is not an adult, she's a child, a girl, not a "woman" you devious sick bastard.
Wrong, ass breath. In NY the age of majority for purposes of consent to sexual relations is 17.

The question is not for you to decide. It’s already determined.
The ethics committee found substantial evidence he committed statutory rape.
Allegations aren’t proof. And one can’t commit statutory rape (on the basis of the age of the parties) where both are of legal age. You dunce.
Gaetz bowed out, ran away because he knows that too many people believed the allegations.
He did bow out. That’s all you know. The breaths you mere speculation under the guise of “fact.” Once again, turds like you don’t sweat any details and you don’t care about actual facts or the law.
That's their duty, it doesn't matter if he was convicted or not, the house have standards and they trust the ethics committee and its findings.
Nope. The “House” offered some opinions but, like you, their opinions ignore the law.

Did Gaetz behave improperly? You weren’t there. You don’t know. You persist in substituting your mere speculation or the mere opinions of others.

You’re a very shallow & lightweight little troll, Hemlock Homeless.
 
Matt is capable of defending himself. Too bad Hunter Biden was not capable. Good that Hunter had the daddy who pardoned him.

We want to hear from Democrats who think Daddy was right to pardon his own son?

First hear from Gaetz.

Post​


See new posts

Conversation​





Matt Gaetz
@mattgaetz
Subscribe


Well there is this
👇

Quote






xakhREzG_normal.jpg


𝐃𝐁 𝐂𝐨𝐨𝐩𝐞𝐫 𝕋𝕏

@DBCooperTX
·
Dec 25
Replying to @abc13houston
I’m no Gaetz fan, but his main accuser here appears to be in prison for falsely accusing someone else of this same stuff.
🤦‍♂️
Gaetz was tried in the court of public opinion and found guilty. Everybody thinks he's a sleazeball unfit for high office.
 
Uh huh. Although your reply was as to a person other than the one under actual discussion. You’re an assclown.

Wrong, ass breath. In NY the age of majority for purposes of consent to sexual relations is 17.
1735664850795.webp

Looks like you'd not make a very good ethics committee member.
The question is not for you to decide. It’s already determined.

Allegations aren’t proof. And one can’t commit statutory rape (on the basis of the age of the parties) where both are of legal age. You dunce.
See above snippet.
He did bow out. That’s all you know. The breaths you mere speculation under the guise of “fact.” Once again, turds like you don’t sweat any details and you don’t care about actual facts or the law.

Nope. The “House” offered some opinions but, like you, their opinions ignore the law.

Did Gaetz behave improperly? You weren’t there. You don’t know. You persist in substituting your mere speculation or the mere opinions of others.
I believe the ethics committee not Gaetz.
You’re a very shallow & lightweight little troll, Hemlock Homeless.
Don't forget to close the gaet behind you on your way out.
 
Gaetz was tried in the court of public opinion and found guilty. Everybody thinks he's a sleazeball unfit for high office.
Some people here like Twat Again, admire scum like Gaetz, they get excited at the idea of a child being screwed by sleaze bags, it excites them, that's why Trump excites them.
 
Some people here like Twat Again, admire scum like Gaetz, they get excited at the idea of a child being screwed by sleaze bags, it excites them, that's why Trump excites them.
Those people weren't raised right and that let to low moral standards. They probably don't even know what you are talking about.
 
View attachment 1059899
Looks like you'd not make a very good ethics committee member.
Better than a prejudgmental idiot lowlife such as you.
See above snippet.
Bite my ass.
I believe the ethics committee not Gaetz.
Nobody cares what a simpleton like you chooses to believe.
Don't forget to close the gaet behind you on your way out.
Don’t forget gfy.
 
Those people weren't raised right and that let to low moral standards. They probably don't even know what you are talking about.
They're all over the forum and I regularly put them in their place, they eventually shut up once they realize they can't fool Sherlock Holmes.

But seriously, yes, it is pretty disturbing that we have a President (soon) who epitomizes sleaze and criminality and that so many little people want to applaud him.
 
They're all over the forum and I regularly put them in their place, they eventually shut up once they realize they can't fool Sherlock Holmes.

But seriously, yes, it is pretty disturbing that we have a President (soon) who epitomizes sleaze and criminality and that so many little people want to applaud him.
Trump actually convinced em that he's sleazy for THEIR benefit.
 
False. I just don’t presume guilt in the way you scumbags always do.
You want to believe Gaetz over the ethics committee, why did you do that?
No. That’s just you projecting.
You chose to use the term "woman" when referring to a child, that disturbs me.
Nah. Truth, fairness and reality are far more fulfilling to most of us. Not to vermin like you.
Do you think the ethics committee members are all liars?
 
Trump actually convinced em that he's sleazy for THEIR benefit.
Yes, they have been hoodwinked and sooner or later it will dawn on them how stupid they've been. He's going to fuck up the United States and they will see no benefits from their vote for him, they will gain absolutely nothing form this, but they are too stupid to grasp this yet.

These people actually believe that their lives are destined to improve, they actually believe that, it's insane.
 
You want to believe Gaetz over the ethics committee, why did you do that?
The ethics committee made some determinations. It wasn’t a trial. There was no cross examination.

Why is it that you insist on a presumption of guilt for a person whose political views you merely disagree with? You’re a hack.
You chose to use the term "woman" when referring to a child, that disturbs me.
I couldn’t care less what disturbs you.

She is a woman at 17. So, facts bother you. Tough shit.
Do you think the ethics committee members are all liars?
Nope. But neither do I imagine that their willingness to accuse thereby becomes an institute for actual evidence or proof of guilt.

You’re in miles over your pinhead, Shitstain Hemlock.
 
The ethics committee made some determinations. It wasn’t a trial. There was no cross examination.
Where did I say it was a trial?
Why is it that you insist on a presumption of guilt for a person whose political views you merely disagree with? You’re a hack.
I choose to believe the ethics committee, they are there for a purpose.
I couldn’t care less what disturbs you.
As an American shouldn't that have been "I could care less" :auiqs.jpg:
She is a woman at 17. So, facts bother you. Tough shit.
1735667100867.webp

How old is the "woman" in your life I wonder...
Nope. But neither do I imagine that their willingness to accuse thereby becomes an institute for actual evidence or proof of guilt.

You’re in miles over your pinhead, Shitstain Hemlock.
I am now wondering whether you actually are Matt Gaetz, it would explain a great deal of your posts here.
 
Where did I say it was a trial?

You didn’t you retard. That’s the point. Absent a trial, there can be no possible conviction. Damn; you’re a fucking asshole.
I choose to believe the ethics committee, they are there for a purpose.
You choose to “believe” mere accusations? Ok. But then, don’t couch them as facts, you gerbil.
As an American shouldn't that have been "I could care less"
No. As a matter of idiom, it could be either. Try to spend many nights worried about it, you sniveling twit.
View attachment 1059911
How old is the "woman" in your life I wonder...
I can’t help your ignorance.

And try to avoid invoking any family, you rancid twat.
I am now wondering whether you actually are Matt Gaetz, it would explain a great deal of your posts here.
🥱
 
You didn’t you retard. That’s the point. Absent a trial, there can be no possible conviction. Damn; you’re a fucking asshole.

You choose to “believe” mere accusations? Ok. But then, don’t couch them as facts, you gerbil.
If you ever had a proper job you'd know all about background investigations (as an immigrant I've been subject to very thorough background checks by the FBI and Interpol). If you were hiring a person and a background investigation found reasonable evidence of a crime pertaining to drugs and rape but not enough for a criminal trial, would you be happy to hire that person?
No. As a matter of idiom, it could be either. Try to spend many nights worried about it, you sniveling twit.

I can’t help your ignorance.

And try to avoid invoking any family, you rancid twat.

🥱
 
I’m not you, asshole.

Thank God.

It is way past time for even a dope lke you to grasped the obvious difference between actual guilt and a mere unsubstantiated allegation.
Stop playing make believe again. You are not in a courtroom (not that you have ever really been in one -- as counsel), and "innocent until proven guilty" is only in a court of law where an accused is on trial.

Every day, people get away (legally) with crimes they've committed
 
So let's clear this up NOW.

You, BackAgain , believe that Gaetz is innocent.... never fucked a teenager, nor paid for her SEX, Nor traveled across State Lines.
He's a bumbling, mumbling imbecile - a great feet to accomplish, being as he is , an anonymous internet message board troll.
 
If you ever had a proper job you'd know all about background investigations (as an immigrant I've been subject to very thorough background checks by the FBI and Interpol). If you were hiring a person and a background investigation found reasonable evidence of a crime pertaining to drugs and rape but not enough for a criminal trial, would you be happy to hire that person?
We didn’t need any further confirmation of your inability to make valid distinctions.

What you have is nothing. Claims that he committed statutory rape which don’t bother to weigh in the fact that the age of consent makes it impossible.

You studiously insist on missing the point.

And you’re too gutless to concede your own massive mistakes.
 
Back
Top Bottom