Basically you're dishonest.
Not at all. None of your factually baseless accusations have any merit.
I want everyone who wants to own, possess or ever have in their custody and control licensed by their state.
Good. What do you offer in return? Nothing of value?
Posting lies won't change my policy positions no matter how often those on the fringe try to rewrite it.
What lies? I posted no lies.
We have a problem and that problems is gun violence.
No. YOU have a problem with "gun violence." For the rest of us the problem is violence... ALL of it. You obviously find violence entirely acceptable, provided only that no gun is involved.
Probably because in your romanticized notions of violence, guns allow for an unfair advantage... for victims.
It impacts families, schools, small business, government services on all levels and health care.
Right. Not violence... ONLY "gun violence."
The NRA and its followers offer no solutions, for their rights to enjoy their fetish, supersede the rights of everyone else.
100% denial of reality from a superstitious gun-queer.
Thus it is my opinion that the NRA and its members are culpable for more deaths of innocent Americans than all the terrorists have accomplished.
An opinion based entirely on logical fallacy and OBVIOUS disinformation.
Nothing you've posted reflects reality. Thus, you are schizophrenic or a liar.
Nonsense. None of your factually baseless accusations have any merit.
Which logical fallacy do you suppose I've committed?
Ignoratio Elenchi, Argumentum Ad-hominem, Du Chaudron, Strawman Fallacy, Fallacy of Composition, Magical Thinking, Appeal to Emotion, Post Hoc, Affirming the Consequent... the list goes on--pick one, Princess.
BTW, I recommend you look up the work "culpable", maybe your ignorance will defend your foolish remarks.
Done. Now let's see if you can make a point using valid logic applied to verifiable facts of reality.
Anyone can go on line and list logical fallacies. Without providing examples you have done nothing beyond mentally masturbating (MM).
That you think, oops, that you believe your response is anything but MM is sad.
Guns are ubiquitous in our culture and easily obtained by all of us, even those most of us agree should never own, possess or have one in their custody and control.
Gun sales to those who should never have access to them can be limited if a national registry existed, where anyone who sold a gun could check to see if the buyer was legally licensed on line.
There exists no Constitutional Right to Privacy, no matter how the NRA and its supporters want to spin "infringed".
Thus the sale a of a gun to an unlicensed person would become a felony, and cause to suspend or revoke the license of the seller.
For the seller would by definition become a criminal.
It would also make sense for all new guns sold to be registered to the buyer, and when the gun is sold, it is sold to a buyer licensed, and the record of the sale be forwarded to the DOJ.
Thus, if the weapon is used in a crime, it can be tracked to its lawful owner; and, if the gun is stolen, it can be reported as such and recorded on the same registry.
Can and will fraud continue? Of course, but laws are made because (1) honest citizens understand the need for laws and respect them, and (2) those who violate the law are punished. That is why they mostly work. To not have laws is anarchy.
There is no rational rebuttal to this argument; only an emotional challenge; such challenges always includes a recitation of the Second Amendment, which only fools and those challenged by reality believe is sacrosanct.
Getting a license will be easy, as long as one has never been convicted of a crime of violence, has never been civilly detained as a danger to themselves or others, found by a court to be a member of a criminal gang, sanctioned with a restraining order or on probation.
Of course anyone prohibited by the Gun Control Act of 1968 should be unable to secure a license.
