I am pretty sure this is a lie, but I have no proof. Anyway.
I am willing to listen to your point, but I honestly do not believe when you say you merely want me to listen to your point, because you did not say anything to acknowledge what I said at all, instead you just went on and on, which gave me the impression that you just wanted to "beat" me, that you weren't really for a discussion.
Anyway, to answer your point: No, I am not saying that protestors can just go against the police, even though they might genuinely feel that the police and their actions are wrong. But what I do say though, is that anytime in a confrontation like this, we should listen to both sides, and then decide for ourselves who has justice on their side. If, after we take everything into consideration, and have determined that the protestors were really within their right to have gone against the police, then they should be pardoned. If not, then they need to go to jail.
Does the above satisfy you, sir?
Why all the tears, sir? Did all that talk about fragile male egos somehow strike a chord with you?
