Zincwarrior
Diamond Member
Legal means legal. Edited by me to remove insult.Good. And if legal protesters interfere with law enforcement doing their jobs, then they should be arrested.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Legal means legal. Edited by me to remove insult.Good. And if legal protesters interfere with law enforcement doing their jobs, then they should be arrested.
You ignorant racist POS, the biggest threat to white folks is other white folks. It isn't black folks are committing more crime, the system is designed to send us to prison and put your pasty ass on probation or send you to rehab. Btw the majority of violent crime is committed by WHITE MALES. Just check out Table 43. Table 43Got about 10 million Back males old enough but no too old to cause significant mayhem. Many already on probation or locked up "in the system"
Suppose 1 million of them still roaming free killing and robbing daily to commit 70% all violent crimes? Compared to maybe 100 million total males. Its a 1% problem.
Profile, avoid, plain and simple. Some big blue chocolate cities its not easy to stay alive. Have mercy.
Then your post makes no sense. People are allowed to protest and law enforcement is allowed to enforce the laws. If the protesters interfere with law enforcement, they are no longer legal protesters.Legal means legal dumbass.
When I was Army EOD, we used to work with local cops all the time, they just had to sign a waiver.Doesn't the oath taken by the military include "all enemies foreign and domestic"?
The Posse Commitatus act LIMITS how federal troops can interact with law enforcement, it doesn't outright ban it.
If they are legally protesting, there is no law enforcement issue to interfere with.Then your post makes no sense. People are allowed to protest and law enforcement is allowed to enforce the laws. If the protesters interfere with law enforcement, they are no longer legal protesters.
If you don't commit multiple crimes you don't go to prison. By the time a person of any race gets a prison sentence they have BEEN CAUGHT multiple times, been given probation multiple times, served short jail sentences multiple times and unless they are unluckiest person on earth, gotten away with ten to fifty or more crimes for each one they got caught for. When the prosecutors or cops release criminal rap sheets, no sane person can understand why they weren't in prison long before. And the rap sheets only show the crimes they were CAUGHT committing, not he ones they were suspected of or got away clean from. So go peddle your racist crap somewhere else.You ignorant racist POS, the biggest threat to white folks is other white folks. It isn't black folks are committing more crime, the system is designed to send us to prison and put your pasty ass on probation or send you to rehab. Btw the majority of violent crime is committed by WHITE MALES. Just check out Table 43. Table 43
I have an issue with this, because it's not always cut-and-dry like that.Then your post makes no sense. People are allowed to protest and law enforcement is allowed to enforce the laws. If the protesters interfere with law enforcement, they are no longer legal protesters.
Well he is only eighteen now, so that is a possibility. Juveniles are often released for heinous crimes when they turn eighteen. It's a flaw in a badly flawed legal system.But, you said his early release was "probably" because he was a minor.
Now, you have no idea or opinion.
In that case, the protestors are knowingly violating the law and are committing civil disobedience like the Civil Rights protestors of the sixties did. I have no problem with that as long as they are peaceful and are willing to pay the legal consequences of their actions. The second they step into violence against the police or anyone else, they become criminals and not protestors.I have an issue with this, because it's not always cut-and-dry like that.
What if, whatever the LE is trying to enforce, is wrong, and not only that, the protestors also genuinely feel that the LE's action is wrong? I think the issue here is that we always assume that that LE, and basically anything about the government, is always in the right. This is not true and is in fact a very dangerous way of thinking.
Most countries have a national police force, the USA is a glaring exception.By nationalizing the police and adding military? Thats what banana republics do.
When I lived in New York it wasn't bad. It was a different world. The police were all big burly guys who walked a beat. No patrol cars. Their primary weapon was the Billy club. Justice was immediate under that Billy club.There have been a LOT of Democrat mayors.
But in the 80s, when a Republican won, there were major improvements.
But the Dems took back over, and crime in back through the roof.
I am not asking you if they broke the law. I am asking you if you support them morally.In that case, the protestors are knowingly violating the law and are committing civil disobedience like the Civil Rights protestors of the sixties did. I have no problem with that as long as they are peaceful and are willing to pay the legal consequences of their actions. The second they step into violence against the police or anyone else, they become criminals and not protestors.
I support non-violent civil disobedience, not criminal violence.I am not asking you if they broke the law. I am asking you if you support them morally.
You ignorant racist POS, the biggest threat to white folks is other white folks. It isn't black folks are committing more crime, the system is designed to send us to prison and put your pasty ass on probation or send you to rehab. Btw the majority of violent crime is committed by WHITE MALES. Just check out Table 43. Table 43
It's easy to define something as "criminal violence" when you are the government and wants to punish those who resist you.I support non-violent civil disobedience, not criminal violence.
If you don't commit multiple crimes you don't go to prison. By the time a person of any race gets a prison sentence they have BEEN CAUGHT multiple times, been given probation multiple times, served short jail sentences multiple times and unless they are unluckiest person on earth, gotten away with ten to fifty or more crimes for each one they got caught for. When the prosecutors or cops release criminal rap sheets, no sane person can understand why they weren't in prison long before. And the rap sheets only show the crimes they were CAUGHT committing, not he ones they were suspected of or got away clean from. So go peddle your racist crap somewhere else.
Let's look at table 43 shall we?
[th]
murder and non-negligent manslaughter
[/th][td]
total 7,964
[/td][td]
white 3,650
[/td][td]
black 4,078
[/td]
,blacks committed more intentional killings.
[th]
Rape3
[/th][td]
total 16,599
[/td][td]
white 11,588
[/td][td]
black 4,427
[/td]
whites committed more rapes.
[th]
Robbery
[/th][td width="24.0625%"]
total 56,305
[/td][td]
whites 25,143
[/td][td width="28.6042%"]
blacks 29,677
[/td]
blacks comitted more robberies
[th]
Aggravated assault
[/th][td]
total 274,376
[/td][td]
whites 169,467
[/td][td]
blacks 91,164
[/td]
whites committed more aggravated assaults
[th]
Burglary
[/th][td]
total 118,843
[/td][td]
whites 81,104
[/td][td]
blacks 34,188
[/td]
whites committed more burglaries
I'm not going to waste our time annotating the entire report, but in killing and robbery blacks committed more crimes even in raw numbers. In almost every other category blacks committed far more crimes than their percentage of the population would justify. In fact the only offenses I can find where blacks committed less than twelve percent of the total crimes were DUI and vagrancy.
if your so called protesters refrain from what they usually do [attack cops and destroy property] there will be no need send in our brave troops ..They are creating a 600 troop quick reaction force for nationwide use. In either there or Washington, when will the guard be deployed against legal protesters? I figure by the end of the month.