Mask wearing is the tin foil hat of the pandemic.

dblack

Platinum Member
Joined
May 21, 2011
Messages
34,980
Reaction score
3,821
Points
1,130
Remember the bullshit about how it could land on a steel countertop
and stay infectious for two weeks?
Seriously, if your neighbor was pumping arsenic into the air and making your family sick - and they refused to stop because they didn't believe arsenic was poisonous. Would you defend their freedom to do that? Or would you defend your family?
 

WEATHER53

Gold Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2017
Messages
10,383
Reaction score
2,663
Points
290
Remember the bullshit about how it could land on a steel countertop
and stay infectious for two weeks?
Seriously, if your neighbor was pumping arsenic into the air and making your family sick - and they refused to stop because they didn't believe arsenic was poisonous. Would you defend their freedom to do that? Or would you defend your family?
Absurdity
You are not a conservative nor independent because neither offer up such fallacious “what if’s”
 

Levant

Platinum Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2020
Messages
2,063
Reaction score
1,317
Points
903
Location
Northeast Oklahoma
It'll be full of people wearing masks.

Wear a mask if you want, you have no business telling others they need to.

You made that decision for yourself, others can do the same.
This is exactly correct. If you don't want to get infected, stay home. To require healthy people to lock down, closing SOME shops, so other people can go to OTHER shops with a reduced risk is just plain tyranny. I reduce my own risk by staying home as much as reasonable. Sometimes I go out because the need, or even the want, overcomes my fear - because my fear isn't ruling my life. Those for whom fear is ruling their life need to just stay home - and hopefully they were preppers before the pandemic and they have the food they need.
 

dblack

Platinum Member
Joined
May 21, 2011
Messages
34,980
Reaction score
3,821
Points
1,130
Remember the bullshit about how it could land on a steel countertop
and stay infectious for two weeks?
Seriously, if your neighbor was pumping arsenic into the air and making your family sick - and they refused to stop because they didn't believe arsenic was poisonous. Would you defend their freedom to do that? Or would you defend your family?
Absurdity
You are not a conservative nor independent because neither offer up such fallacious “what if’s”
Sure. Keep telling yourself that. My biggest beef with Trump's deplorables, is that they're destroying limited-government conservatism, and worse, the entire concept of individual liberty. An entire generation of voters now associate conservatism with belligerent, racist idiots. And that generation of voters is going to drag us headlong into socialism.
 

Levant

Platinum Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2020
Messages
2,063
Reaction score
1,317
Points
903
Location
Northeast Oklahoma
The mask is not just to protect you
It is to protect others from your germs
If I go to the grocery store and am infected, and I touch a can of beans on the shelf and put it back and then you come pick up that can of beans and then you check out, go to your car, toss your mask, scratch your face, you have the virus and me wearing a mask did nothing for you.

The mask has very little to no protection in the 1% of risk cases - someone coughing - but it does absolutely nothing at all in the 99% of risk cases - touching something an infected person touched and then touching your face.
 

Billy_Bob

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2014
Messages
23,689
Reaction score
8,795
Points
1,280
Location
Top Of The Great Divide
The dynamics of mass hysteria are never pleasant. There are examples throughout history of absurd behavior among human groups that defy explanation. Sociologists describe this affliction as mass psychogenic illness, Mass psychogenic Disorder, or Epidemic hysteria But until a pathogen was released from a lab in Wuhan China in late 2019 or early 2020, mass hysteria/conversion disorder had been the business of children or adolescents not adults and had never gone worldwide.

Now the stability of the entire planet is under threat as otherwise normal human beings cover their faces with masks, follow arrows in public markets, sit under the blazing sun in pot-holed parking lots to eat in public, and close elementary schools. The US is particularly vulnerable to the disorder as many citizens who were already cerebrally weakened by a presidential derangement syndrome, riot in the streets, Firebomb police stations and topple statues over a presidential election.

Local city governments are getting in on the act with another manifestation called CYA as they mobilize to pass Halloween ordinances requiring mandatory mask-wearing in public. No matter that the sainted icon of the hysteria, Dr. Anthony Fauci, first advised against mask wearing. No matter that fauci has ties directly to the both the labs in China where the concocted, DNA-spliced, gain-of-function, germ has all the earmarks of an unnatural manufactured agent.

Mass sociogenic illness (hysteria) among the population makes an excellent smokescreen to hide the real perpetrators whose motives are economic, political, and ideological not medical. In a state of chaos and confusion mask wearing has become the tin foil hat of a manipulated population. Big Pharma and its collusion with the People’s Republic of China foster the great lie that an American president is a menace to world health by calling for a return to domestic control of industry and in particular, drug manufacturing.

The foolish and worthless practice of mask wearing has become so engrained in the public psyche that the fact that it does nothing to prevent viral spread is lost like the plot in a panic porn movie. Citizens are advised not to succumb to the foisted fear imposed on them by a dark and treacherous status quo trying to overthrow the results of the last US presidential election.

Wear your mask in public. Not to prevent illness but to calm the natives before November when common sense returns to the masses.
And just think of trump had taken this seriously from the beginning. Not one of you would be peddling this bullshit.
And Faun keeps pedaling bull shit.... Fauci didn't want travel bans but Trump did them any way... Trump acted inside 10 days of the virus getting here. And you push your bull shit even though your precious democrats were touting the Chinese new year and all the festivals happening as safe to go... Fuck you hypocrite..
 

John T. Ford

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2020
Messages
2,233
Reaction score
2,911
Points
1,893
Tell it to Herman Cain
You have absolutely no science whatsoever to back even a suggestion that Cain contracted the Wuhan Virus due to NOT to wearing a face mask.

All you have is the Fake News Bullshit that you guys are constantly parroting.

Again ... I will stick to my original position:

LMAO@ the Stupid Shit Leftist are so Gullible to believe.
 

dblack

Platinum Member
Joined
May 21, 2011
Messages
34,980
Reaction score
3,821
Points
1,130
The mask has very little to no protection in the 1% of risk cases - someone coughing - but it does absolutely nothing at all in the 99% of risk cases - touching something an infected person touched and then touching your face.
Do you have any data to suggest that someone coughing is a "1% risk case"? or that "touching something an infected person touched and then touching your face." is 99% of risk cases? I'm pretty sure you don't. I'm pretty sure you're just making shit up. I'm pretty sure you're wrong.
 

John T. Ford

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2020
Messages
2,233
Reaction score
2,911
Points
1,893
Tell me again how you isolated Herman's mode of transmission?
Well ....

Well ...

Well ....

CNN told him .... isn't that the same as Hard Science? .... :rolleyes:

LMAO@ the Stupid Shit Leftist are so Gullible to believe.
 

dblack

Platinum Member
Joined
May 21, 2011
Messages
34,980
Reaction score
3,821
Points
1,130
And for those who are willing to be mislead keep in mind this is just an initial stage ofView attachment 373306 this attack of your personal liberties.
STFU you moronic dick. God I'm sick of you know it alls who have absolutely no science or education to back up your assertions....twat.
And, as a Libertarian, I'm sick of such douchebags invoking "personal liberty".
 

Billy_Bob

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2014
Messages
23,689
Reaction score
8,795
Points
1,280
Location
Top Of The Great Divide
The mask has very little to no protection in the 1% of risk cases - someone coughing - but it does absolutely nothing at all in the 99% of risk cases - touching something an infected person touched and then touching your face.
Do you have any data to suggest that someone coughing is a "1% risk case"? or that "touching something an infected person touched and then touching your face." is 99% of risk cases? I'm pretty sure you don't. I'm pretty sure you're just making shit up. I'm pretty sure you're wrong.
According to t he CDC over 80% of the cases are caused by physical contact and then placing the hand near or in the mouth, nose or eyes contacting the mucous membranes. Very little is from airborne transmission unless your in a closed room for extended periods of time near an infected individual.

This is why being locked down in your home and receiving mail, food, clothing and other items from outside is how this virus spreads the most.
 

dblack

Platinum Member
Joined
May 21, 2011
Messages
34,980
Reaction score
3,821
Points
1,130
The mask has very little to no protection in the 1% of risk cases - someone coughing - but it does absolutely nothing at all in the 99% of risk cases - touching something an infected person touched and then touching your face.
Do you have any data to suggest that someone coughing is a "1% risk case"? or that "touching something an infected person touched and then touching your face." is 99% of risk cases? I'm pretty sure you don't. I'm pretty sure you're just making shit up. I'm pretty sure you're wrong.
According to t he CDC over 80% of the cases are caused by physical contact and then placing the hand near or in the mouth, nose or eyes contacting the mucous membranes. Very little is from airborne transmission unless your in a closed room for extended periods of time near an infected individual.
I haven't seen that. Gotta link?

In any case, it sounds like you're conceding that it's not 1%, so we're making progress. 20% is pretty significant, wouldn't you say?

This is why being locked down in your home and receiving mail, food, clothing and other items from outside is how this virus spreads the most.
Hmm... just read this (Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)) - they say you're full of shit.
 

RodISHI

Platinum Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2008
Messages
21,822
Reaction score
6,788
Points
350
And for those who are willing to be mislead keep in mind this is just an initial stage ofView attachment 373306 this attack of your personal liberties.
STFU you moronic dick. God I'm sick of you know it alls who have absolutely no science or education to back up your assertions....twat.
Piss off it as it comes from the New England Medical Journal. All you ignorant idiots have to do is learn to read and do the research of the articles, studies, etc... and then you wouldn't sound like such ignorant idjits.

AWWL  1.PNG
 

RodISHI

Platinum Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2008
Messages
21,822
Reaction score
6,788
Points
350
Another note on the mask BS. A friend brought this up a few days ago about snap chat. I recall when FB was doing the cutesy masks. Noticed also that it was most geared towards females.
Grooming young people.PNG
 

Fort Fun Indiana

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2017
Messages
43,484
Reaction score
4,833
Points
1,870
The Communist Democrats have since the beginning of this Covid 19 scam have first thought about how they might use it to hurt President Trump politically and it hasn't worked
The best strategy has clearly been to just let Trump talk about it. The things he says about it are so embarrassing as to be more effective than any campaign tactic by the democrats.
The only thing the idiot Dems could do to mess that up would be to select a total moron candidate like Sleepy Joe the Boob Squeezer to run
No. Bernie would have been a worse candidate. Sleepy, centrist, steady Joe was tge right pick, from that field. The attacks on Bernie would have been political attacks, like communism and socialism. The only attacks that Joe's opponents can make just make them sound immature and mean.
 

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top