different states have different laws because not every state is the same; they are different.
so, you didn't graduate sixth grade I'm guessing.
This poster you reflexively insult is making just that point....states have different standards when it comes to knowingly infecting others with HIV AIDS.
So how stupid and needless was your imbecilic comment? Very stupid. Very very needless.
Perhaps you fear other trolls will look even more idiotic than you thereby robbing you of your notoriety?
Don't worry. I think your place here is safe.
Notice when other staet run out of blood they go to CA to get it.
YOU CAN GIVE BLOOD AND HAVE AIDS IT IS NO LONGER A FELONY IN CA.
KNOW UR SHIT BEFORE LOOKING LIKE AN DUFIS.
lol
(1) Existing law makes it a felony punishable by imprisonment for 3, 5, or 8 years in the state prison to expose another person to the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) by engaging in unprotected sexual activity when the infected person knows at the time of the unprotected sex that he or she is infected with HIV, has not disclosed his or her HIV-positive status, and acts with the specific intent to infect the other person with HIV. Existing law makes it a felony punishable by imprisonment for 2, 4, or 6 years for any person to donate blood, tissue, or, under specified circumstances, semen or breast milk, if the person knows that he or she has acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), or that he or she has tested reactive to HIV. Existing law provides that a person who is afflicted with a contagious, infectious, or communicable disease who willfully exposes himself or herself to another person, or any person who willfully exposes another person afflicted with the disease to someone else, is guilty of a misdemeanor.
This bill would repeal those provisions. The bill would instead make the intentional transmission of an infectious or communicable disease, as defined, a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than 6 months if certain circumstances apply, including that the defendant knows he or she or a 3rd party is afflicted with the disease, that the defendant acts with the specific intent to transmit or cause an afflicted 3rd party to transmit the disease to another person, that the defendant or the afflicted 3rd pa..................'''
So when a central blood bank already screened the blood ships it out to other staets what in the hell makes you think they re screen it, the shit has aids they know it and it's only a misde.
