And she keeps going further off of the cliff of sanity...
When she wants to bilk the system for all it is worth, well then she "just like everybody else and entitled to the same benefits". But when it's pointed out how homosexuals are completely incapable of creating offspring, her narrative suddenly changes to "parenting has absolutely nothing to do with legal, civil marriage one way or the other". Uh, what?!? Isn't that what you built your entire weak argument on originally - that you are a parent just like everyone else, that you're children don't experience any lack of parenting just like everyone else, and that that entitles you to benefits?
My narrative hasn't changed, Puppy, but yours grows increasingly desperate. Children are not a requirement for Civil Marriage in ANY state or municipality and some, in fact, prohibit procreation based on close familial ties. To use an inability to procreate as a reason to do deny civil marriage is ludicrous and even drew big laughs with the SCOTUS.
(Rather like you do with your posts)
Your Demands of an Exclusionary Expanion of Special Marriage Rights based Soley on your Defiance of your Natural Design and Equipment is what's Laughable...
If you Deserve Marriage Rights for your Coupling then so do Siblings who Care for Children and so do Sister Wives and Bisexuals.
Ultimately Marriage is a Reflection of what Created you...
And that is only Possible with Man and Wife.
The only reason you Demand Marriage for your Choice is because it Lacks the Validation on it's own that you so Desperately need from Society.
Unlike with a Black Man and a White Woman who can Create Life, you will NEVER be Viewed as Equal in your Choice in Society's eyes regardless of what the Law says.
We were not Designed in Nature to Couple with the Same Sex... End of ******* List.
That's never going to change.
peace...
I am an undergrad biomedical science student, and I learned something interesting in Genetics Recently.
As most of you probably know, if you are XX you are female, and if you are XY you are male.
However, there are several genetic mutations that can do crazy things, and I could give MULTIPLE examples, but just one will make my point.
A (Y) carrying sperm joins with the obviously (X) carrying female egg, forming an XY zygote, making a genotypic male.
HOWEVER, there is a region on that Y chromosome that MUST activate in order for the propper male hormones to be released that cause the baby to grow testicles, and a penis. If that region is NOT activated, then the fetus will grow into a phenotypic FEMALE! Even though the baby carries an X and Y chromosome, the baby will walk, talk, and look exactly like a female.
Literally a male in a females body. (Just to be clear, the reverse is also possible.)
Genetics is imperfect and it makes mistakes, so are we to say that we can deny a PERSON rights because they are in a SAME SEX relationship? The reality is that we dont always even know if it ACTUALLY IS a SAME SEX relationship.
Basically what I am saying, is that so many people are too concerned with what they see with their eyes, to even begin to look at whats inside of someone.
An XY man with a penis cant help but be attracted to an XX's breasts.....kind of like an XY MAN with a VAGINA cant help but be attracted to the same thing.....its literally EXACTLY the same....but it just looks different. You cant deny your genes.
