Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I can't stand Savage, or Hannity...Levin is okay when he actually discusses a topic...when he starts yelling, I turn him off. Any moron can yell into a microphone can call it passion.uumm, he's on 3-6 in the afternoon here on the West Coast.. Just so ya know
-Geaux
I'm just glad that assclown Sean Hannity got dropped and a real talk show host took his Cumulus Media prime time slot. Limbaugh then Savage then Levin makes a perfect day for me, not having to turn off the radio for that trailer trash asshole Hannity.
I have to be honest, Michael Weiner, just doesn't cut it for me. Sometimes he makes strong points, but at a drop of a hat, he's off talking about Teddy, what he had for lunch, his fathers pants, and not to eat these mushrooms, amongst a hundred other things he gets fixated on.....and his INCESSANT SELF PRAISE makes the Obumanation seem almost normal! I don't care how many Ph.D's he has, he's just not that informative! Hannity isn't much better, but, most of the time, he will stay on a topic, and his fill ins are excellent. BUT FEW do it as good as Levin, and less have the knowledge of Constitutional law that he has.
The chief complaint about Michael Savage is also the chief reason for his popularity. He isn't just politics, he talks about life, and he does so with depth of knowledge and character that an asshat like Hannity could never match. Hannity was the amateur, Savage was the professional talk show host.
And my problem with Hannity was simple. He would set up his show so that two loons would have at each other and make him seem reasonable by comparison. His show was about drama, not about education. He was the right wing Jerry Springer, and I quickly tired of his trailer trash radio program like everyone with an IQ above 90 did. There's a reason he lost that Cumulus Media slot. Eventually the sugar high trailer trash crap must give way to true talent.
Thank God that talent rose to the top!
Have you ever listened to John Bachelor? I enjoy his program as he gets in-depth with experts on diverse topics ranging from foreign policy to Federal politics. His program often focuses on topics rarely heard in the other shows. He'll do history one segment, then switch over to the antics and machinations of China the next. Always with experts in the discipline.
As far as I can tell, he has been the only one bringing information out of Hong Kong on the freedom movement happening there, and the Chinese crackdown. No one is covering he Ukraine but John. He has an NYU professor each week who is an expert on Russian history as well as modern Russian body politick....and they detail the crap that the Obama administration is trying to pull....
All in all, its a really good radio show.
The truth is, I can only stand to listen to so much talk radio no matter who it is. I like Andrew Wilkow on Sirius XM, but I only have access to so much, just the Cumulus Media and XM radio, that's it.
Levin can't break into drive time radio. Why not? He is so awesome.
Has nothing to do with the thread, dumbass.
Once again --- posting images is not articulating a point.
That's why I always say, if you can't articulate your own point, well it just might be you ain't got one.
e.g. post 1...
Once again --- posting images is not articulating a point.
That's why I always say, if you can't articulate your own point, well it just might be you ain't got one.
e.g. post 1...
One might to say that when it comes to control of internet, it will apply to all, conservatives and 'liberals' alike. They are looking at blogs, messageboards and businesses.You haven't heard??Uh...... "wallah"??
We must be in deep intellectual erudiion here. "Wallah". Sounds like an old dialect you'd hear in the Sea Islands off Georgia.
"Wallah" --- wasn't he Beaver Cleaver's big brother?
"Wallah" -- where I keep my driver's licen.
"Wallah". Ohmyfuckingod.
So essplain to us all, Pissyante -- who's "taking over" the internets? What are they gonna do with it?
Oh this is gonna be golden....
Greg
Here it comes.....
The Right Scoop ^
Mark Levin had on his show tonight Ajit Pai, the FCC Commissioner who is trying to expose how Obama and his cronies at the FCC are going to takeover the internet. Pai told Levin that after the 2012 election, Obama told the FCC what he wanted them to do and wallah, now we have a 332 page Internet takeover plan. That’s why he calls it Obama’s plan. To sum up the takeover, Pai characterized it like this: “We’re adopting solutions that won’t work to a problem that doesn’t exist using legal authority we don’t have.” Sound familiar? Listen to the...
Here it comes.....
The Right Scoop ^
Mark Levin had on his show tonight Ajit Pai, the FCC Commissioner who is trying to expose how Obama and his cronies at the FCC are going to takeover the internet. Pai told Levin that after the 2012 election, Obama told the FCC what he wanted them to do and wallah, now we have a 332 page Internet takeover plan. That’s why he calls it Obama’s plan. To sum up the takeover, Pai characterized it like this: “We’re adopting solutions that won’t work to a problem that doesn’t exist using legal authority we don’t have.” Sound familiar? Listen to the...
Yes, it does sound familiar because it's the same old nonsensical fear-mongoring for financial profit and political gain. And, as usual, conservatives moths fly right into the light bulb.
* * * * The rules I am asking for are simple, common-sense steps that reflect the Internet you and I use every day, and that some ISPs already observe. These bright-line rules include:
- No blocking. If a consumer requests access to a website or service, and the content is legal, your ISP should not be permitted to block it. That way, every player — not just those commercially affiliated with an ISP — gets a fair shot at your business.
- No throttling. Nor should ISPs be able to intentionally slow down some content or speed up others — through a process often called “throttling” — based on the type of service or your ISP’s preferences.
- Increased transparency. The connection between consumers and ISPs — the so-called “last mile” — is not the only place some sites might get special treatment. So, I am also asking the FCC to make full use of the transparency authorities the court recently upheld, and if necessary to apply net neutrality rules to points of interconnection between the ISP and the rest of the Internet.
- No paid prioritization. Simply put: No service should be stuck in a “slow lane” because it does not pay a fee. That kind of gatekeeping would undermine the level playing field essential to the Internet’s growth. So, as I have before, I am asking for an explicit ban on paid prioritization and any other restriction that has a similar effect.
If carefully designed, these rules should not create any undue burden for ISPs, and can have clear, monitored exceptions for reasonable network management and for specialized services such as dedicated, mission-critical networks serving a hospital. But combined, these rules mean everything for preserving the Internet’s openness.
The rules also have to reflect the way people use the Internet today, which increasingly means on a mobile device. I believe the FCC should make these rules fully applicable to mobile broadband as well, while recognizing the special challenges that come with managing wireless networks.
Here it comes.....
The Right Scoop ^
Mark Levin had on his show tonight Ajit Pai, the FCC Commissioner who is trying to expose how Obama and his cronies at the FCC are going to takeover the internet. Pai told Levin that after the 2012 election, Obama told the FCC what he wanted them to do and wallah, now we have a 332 page Internet takeover plan. That’s why he calls it Obama’s plan. To sum up the takeover, Pai characterized it like this: “We’re adopting solutions that won’t work to a problem that doesn’t exist using legal authority we don’t have.” Sound familiar? Listen to the...
Yes, it does sound familiar because it's the same old nonsensical fear-mongoring for financial profit and political gain. And, as usual, conservatives moths fly right into the light bulb.
I see Groucho's cigar, burned your brain!
The FCC is "issuing" its new rules on Thursday. It is not being shared for the perusal of the American people prior to its issuance. It seems to fundamentally alter how ISPs are "viewed" and thus how they may be "regulated," according to some leaked advanced word ( such as the interview of one of the commissioners shared by Mark Levin -- see the OP).
I am curious why they are doing all of this shit under the veil of such secrecy? Why no period for public scrutiny and comment?
Stop what exactly?We tried to warn the people what would happen they put him office
Now he's steamrolling over you too
bravo good frikken job
call you worthless Reprsentative's in Congress and demand they stop this