Holy shit you never stop lying. You didn't ask for specific proof the war is illegal and that is because there is a ton of evidence proving so that you tried to avoid tha by demanding a court case showing it is illegal. The funny part is you didn't know that court case existed and after it was provided you still ignored it. Lol. Now you want to hang everything on that word "duplicative" and pretend you know what you are talking about.
You definately got some screws loose there pal...You better get checked out at a mental hospital. The exact words of the judge spoken in a Military court and recorded by a court stenographer.."The charge of unauthorized absence, Article 86, is dismissed as it's duplicative."
Why did he do this?
Here's why.
From Article 87
(1) Movement. “Movement” as used in Article 87 includes a move, transfer, or shift of a ship, aircraft, or unit involving a substantial distance and period of time. Whether a particular movement is substantial is a question to be determined by the court-martial considering all the circumstances. Changes which do not constitute a “movement” include practice marches of a short duration with a return to the point of departure, and minor changes in location of ships, aircraft, or units, as when a ship is shifted from one berth to another in the same shipyard or harbor or when a unit is moved from one barracks to another on the same post.
From Article 86:
absents himself or remains absent from his unit, organization, or place of duty at which he is required to be at the time prescribed; shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.”
by missing movement..he absented himself from his place of duty....
DUPLICATIVE....
Your dishonesty is purely ******* entertaining but also quite sad. You just posted the evidence the two charges are completely different but you're so selfish and insecure you pretend they are the same thing. Then you quote the judge but totally ignore the other quote by the Judge where he agreed with the Soldier for why he refused to deploy. If you knew ANYTHING about the military you would know his not being sentenced to prison followed by a direct DisDis is a victory for refusing to deploy. Instead the judge dropped the UA charge and gave him a slap on the wrist.
Look at another case of a soldier refusing to deploy:
"Stewart had already been convicted — and
reduced in rank from sergeant to specialist — of being absent without leave when the bulk of the regiment deployed last summer."
Gee. That says he was convicted of being AWOL. Then read:
"Spc. Benjamin Stewart, 25, of the 2nd Stryker Cavalry
Regiment, pleaded guilty Wednesday to missing movement on Jan. 7, 2008, when he was scheduled to deploy to Iraq."
Soldier gets 6-month sentence for refusing to deploy to Iraq | Stars and Stripes Mobile
(the two sentences are from the same paragraph but I reversed the order to highlight the two charges are certainly different and not duplicative)
Since you have proven to be incapable of addressing obvious facts I need to point out this utterly crushes your "duplicative" claim because a Soldier cannot be convicted twice of the same thing. You totally fail to be honest about any of the facts. This is just like when you claimed Ready Reserves are all Drilling Units but completely ignored the fact the RR category has several sub-categories including the IRR who never Drill. One thing you have certainly Drilled home is you are an utterly thorough pathetic individual. Who the hell is so fucked up they quote the very evidence that proves them wrong only to claim it proves their claim correct?
