Marines leaving Iraq!!!!!

Who gives a shit about US law, how about International law...

I believe the Judge agreed with the Soldiers defense for not deploying on the basis of a combination of US and international law. That's just another area of deep hypocrisy by the pro war crowd. They love to justify iraq by screaming saddam violated UN Resolutions but then say the UN doesn't matter when it's shown the invasion violated the UN Charter.

Bingo...

...gee, I wonder who they're fooling....:cuckoo:

Obviously you, as an outsider, haven't a clue about US military law. Speculate all you want...it's irrelevant and only your opinion...which in a military courts martial which has already convicted the perpetrator..is completely moot.
 
Who gives a shit about US law, how about International law...

**** international law. Ours trumps your international law any day of the week....
NEXT!

As a member of the UNSC we are bound by those international laws. But, given your affinity for ignoring facts I'm sure that won't slow you down one bit from shoving your head up your ass so fast your ears melt from wind shear.

Wrong again. U.S. military law and the laws passed by our Congress is all we adhere to when our own national interests are concerned.

now back to the original request.....
Show us your PROOF that the Iraq War is illegal...SPECIFIC PROOF...NOT CLAIMS..BUT SPECIFIC PROOF THAT HAS BEEN VETTED IN A U.S. COURT OF LAW AND RESULTED IN A CONVICTION.
 
Last time I checked....I don't give a **** who calls me heartless because one selfish person keeps bringing up a lost loved when she can't debate the issue. There are tens and tens of thousands of people who have lost their parents friends wives siblings and other people they cared about and it has been done as a consequence of our actions. It is still happening and I'll be damned if I let one selfish person try to use her fiancee's Sacrifice as a muzzle on those who disagree. She did when I first got here, and even then posters who had been here way before me pointed out she was doing that shit.

Then your punk ass tells me to keep my comments more "civil?" You regularly accuse Vets of lying simply because you don't like their politics. And as you have proven again, you practice dishonesty on a regular basis. You claim Missing Movement is basically the same as being UA/AWOL when they are no where near the same crime. You made that claim to keep trying to avoid the facts. Then you want to get technical and claim since the Judge dismissed the UA charge that isn't the same as being found not guilty? You are an unbelievably pathetic fat **** and if you ever come to Boston please let me know because I would love to buy you a beer so we could discuss this face to face.

See you in about 3 weeks punk.


So....
now...
back to the original request...

How does a judge dismissing a charge make it a finding of not guilty?

Show your irrefutable proof, that STOOD up in a U.S. Court of Law, the war in Iraq was illegal. SPECIFICALLY!


It doesn't get any more specific than a Judge acquitting a Soldier for refusing to deploy based on the war being illegal. Keep embarrassing yourself like the pathetic individual you keep proving to be. You'll be in Boston in about 3 weeks? Great!

Oh my GOD!!! look at this pathetic ****!!!! First he says people who support the war use blood as a sexual lubricant...now he is saying the Judge who dismissed one of the charges as "duplicative" equates to AQUITTING the sailor!!!! AFTER HE SAID THE GUY WAS CONVICTED!!!!!!

CurveLight is what we refer to as a "dim bulb" meaning he lacks the basic intelligence of someone representing the human race.

I asked for specific proof the war was illegal. CurveLight thinks that if someone makes the claim "The war is illegal." that this is legal proof.

Nothing could be further from reality....just like CurveLight...it's about as far from reality as one can get.

CurveLight...YOU LOST THE ARGUMENT...get over it and move on.
 
I believe the Judge agreed with the Soldiers defense for not deploying on the basis of a combination of US and international law. That's just another area of deep hypocrisy by the pro war crowd. They love to justify iraq by screaming saddam violated UN Resolutions but then say the UN doesn't matter when it's shown the invasion violated the UN Charter.

Bingo...

...gee, I wonder who they're fooling....:cuckoo:

Obviously you, as an outsider, haven't a clue about US military law. Speculate all you want...it's irrelevant and only your opinion...which in a military courts martial which has already convicted the perpetrator..is completely moot.

Which has what to do with what I was saying? (hint: Nothing you moron)....
 
**** international law. Ours trumps your international law any day of the week....
NEXT!

As a member of the UNSC we are bound by those international laws. But, given your affinity for ignoring facts I'm sure that won't slow you down one bit from shoving your head up your ass so fast your ears melt from wind shear.

Wrong again. U.S. military law and the laws passed by our Congress is all we adhere to when our own national interests are concerned.

now back to the original request.....
Show us your PROOF that the Iraq War is illegal...SPECIFIC PROOF...NOT CLAIMS..BUT SPECIFIC PROOF THAT HAS BEEN VETTED IN A U.S. COURT OF LAW AND RESULTED IN A CONVICTION.


Prove that your war was legal. Under what jurisdiction did you go to war? What were the circumstances? What was the immediate threat to the US?
 
Who gives a shit about US law, how about International law...

**** international law. Ours trumps your international law any day of the week....
NEXT!

Oh, cool. So you're a rogue nation like North Korea...thanks for clearing that up...

Sorry. You failed. When our national interests are threatened our law trumps international law...and besides..the UN authorized us to use military force....now...try again.
 
As a member of the UNSC we are bound by those international laws. But, given your affinity for ignoring facts I'm sure that won't slow you down one bit from shoving your head up your ass so fast your ears melt from wind shear.

Wrong again. U.S. military law and the laws passed by our Congress is all we adhere to when our own national interests are concerned.

now back to the original request.....
Show us your PROOF that the Iraq War is illegal...SPECIFIC PROOF...NOT CLAIMS..BUT SPECIFIC PROOF THAT HAS BEEN VETTED IN A U.S. COURT OF LAW AND RESULTED IN A CONVICTION.


Prove that your war was legal. Under what jurisdiction did you go to war? What were the circumstances? What was the immediate threat to the US?


Uhhhh...sorry...you have failed AGAIN! The UN authorized us to use military force in Iraq. Then our own Congress authorized the President to use military force in Iraq based on what was known at the time...NEXT!!!
 
Bingo...

...gee, I wonder who they're fooling....:cuckoo:

Obviously you, as an outsider, haven't a clue about US military law. Speculate all you want...it's irrelevant and only your opinion...which in a military courts martial which has already convicted the perpetrator..is completely moot.

Which has what to do with what I was saying? ....

Think about real hard moron...then get back to me.

NEXT!
 
CurveLight...YOU LOST THE ARGUMENT...get over it and move on.

when you provide a decent argument, let the rest of us know....

Apparently you CANNOT REFUTE A SINGLE THING I SAID otherwise you would have...so what's left...attack the poster...typical left wing eurotrash behavior.

NEXT
 
now back to the original request.....
Show us your PROOF that the Iraq War is illegal...SPECIFIC PROOF...NOT CLAIMS..BUT SPECIFIC PROOF THAT HAS BEEN VETTED IN A U.S. COURT OF LAW AND RESULTED IN A CONVICTION.
 
**** international law. Ours trumps your international law any day of the week....
NEXT!

Oh, cool. So you're a rogue nation like North Korea...thanks for clearing that up...

Sorry. You failed. When our national interests are threatened our law trumps international law...and besides..the UN authorized us to use military force....now...try again.

So which is it, UN or US law? Make up your mind..take your time....
 
now back to the original request.....
Show us your PROOF that the Iraq War is illegal...SPECIFIC PROOF...NOT CLAIMS..BUT SPECIFIC PROOF THAT HAS BEEN VETTED IN A U.S. COURT OF LAW AND RESULTED IN A CONVICTION.

That might be a better question had it ever been addressed in this country. The lack of any such finding here isn't indicative of legality under circumstances where its never been before any court.

and whether something is legal under international law is a function of international law and the treaties to which we're signatories. That's why "TREATIES" are specifically mentioned in the Constitution... because they have EQUAL weight.
 
Obviously you, as an outsider, haven't a clue about US military law. Speculate all you want...it's irrelevant and only your opinion...which in a military courts martial which has already convicted the perpetrator..is completely moot.

Which has what to do with what I was saying? ....

Think about real hard moron...then get back to me.

NEXT!

I don't need to. You obviously don't have a clue what you are talking about....carry on!
 
15th post
Exactly...so all it is is spin from the left.

Now can you tell, me as a lawyer...does a Judge dismissing a charge equate to a finding of "not guilty" or "aquittal"?
 
[

Apparently you CANNOT REFUTE A SINGLE THING I SAID otherwise you would have...so what's left...attack the poster...typical left wing eurotrash behavior.

NEXT

What is the point of trying to refute somebody who obviously has no idea what they are talking about ?

To paraphrase the Ultimate Moron on this board: "next!"
 
Back
Top Bottom