Man who ran over BLM rioters will NOT face charges

Sorry racist, but America's history on racism is well documented.
Not America’s history, Democrats’ history.

They are the Party of Slavery, the party of the Confederacy, the party of Jim Crow, and the party that keeps blacks on the bottom rung indefinitely.
 
Defending them from what? Nobody did anything to him or his family or even tried to.

But this is what the powers that be want, they want us killing each other and ignoring them.
Riiigt, because Burn Loot Murder riot squads across the US at the time weren’t openly attacking whites in cars. :smoke:

Let’s see your white ass drive through a BLM riot and see if you don’t get bricked.
 
No, the job of the GJ is to determine if enough evidence exists to charge someone with a crime. They do not determine if a crime was committed or not.

If all you have is semantics, you have nothing.
 
were they doing it in this incident?



why would anyone drive through a riot no matter who was rioting?
Yes, they were attacking and threatening them.

I guess if you are driving through a city and aren’t up to date on every BLM protest, you could take a wrong turn while legally driving on a public road you could find yourself suddenly surrounded by “protesters” who then decide to attack you because they see you are white.
 
words have meanings for a reason.

Crime is a concept established by the State. If the State declines to prosecute and convict, there can be no crime.

you may think what the driver did is WRONG, but only the State can declare something criminal, and in our system only after due process.
 
were they doing it in this incident?



why would anyone drive through a riot no matter who was rioting?




Evidently so because the Grand Jury refused to proceed.

Many people found themselves in those situations by accident. The mob targeted congested roads for a reason.
 
Last edited:
15th post

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom