Man Who Leaked for Comey Writes Guest Essay in NYT Decrying Epstein Document Release

[Billiejeens]

Daniel Richman was, once upon a time, a federal prosecutor. The New York Times saw fit to point this out when he published an opinion piece by him on Monday, along with the fact that he is currently a Columbia University law professor.

Daniel Richman was also, once upon a time, a leaker for James Comey. In fact, he leaked notes that Comey took during his time as FBI director under Donald Trump’s first administration to The New York Times, effectively kickstarting the special counsel investigation into Russiagate that went nowhere.

The New York Times did not point this out. One can easily guess why: Not just because it’s a conflict of interest, but because he’s now arguing against putting government documents out into the public square for reasons one can easily guess at.

.https://www.westernjournal.com/man-leaked-comey-writes-guest-essay-nyt-decrying-epstein-document-release/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=breaking-special&utm_campaign=news-alert&utm_content=2026-02-27

BJ -

Yeah 100%
This clown is in there.
Everyone that he knows in The Credentialed Class is in there.

Releasing info that they think helps them - good
Releasing info that they think hurts them - bad.

They are so transparent and too stupid to see it.

 

[Billiejeens]

Not for nothing -

Also this -

You see, it seems Richman is concerned when it comes to “coercive investigative tools” that “can and have been misused, as when prosecutors and FBI agents illegally rummaged through my emails and computer files in an effort to come up with a case against James Comey, the former FBI director.”

 

[Billiejeens]

Apparently “accountability for people in power” only goes so far, especially when he’s the one who wields the power. It’s not as if there wasn’t a good reason to go through these documents, mind you, because Richman was effectively the leaker that Comey used to push the Russiagate hoax.

 

[Votto]

Daniel Richman was, once upon a time, a federal prosecutor. The New York Times saw fit to point this out when he published an opinion piece by him on Monday, along with the fact that he is currently a Columbia University law professor.

Daniel Richman was also, once upon a time, a leaker for James Comey. In fact, he leaked notes that Comey took during his time as FBI director under Donald Trump’s first administration to The New York Times, effectively kickstarting the special counsel investigation into Russiagate that went nowhere.

The New York Times did not point this out. One can easily guess why: Not just because it’s a conflict of interest, but because he’s now arguing against putting government documents out into the public square for reasons one can easily guess at.

.https://www.westernjournal.com/man-leaked-comey-writes-guest-essay-nyt-decrying-epstein-document-release/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=breaking-special&utm_campaign=news-alert&utm_content=2026-02-27

BJ -

Yeah 100%
This clown is in there.
Everyone that he knows in The Credentialed Class is in there.

Releasing info that they think helps them - good
Releasing info that they think hurts them - bad.

They are so transparent and too stupid to see it.

Everyone knows that the Epstein files only have one value for the Swamp, and that is to create the narrative that Trump was involved\ in order to help win elections,

There is virtually no other reason to push the issue where no one will ever see jail time for the massive sex trafficking scandal, other than Epstein's girl,

 

[TNHarley]

Daniel Richman was, once upon a time, a federal prosecutor. The New York Times saw fit to point this out when he published an opinion piece by him on Monday, along with the fact that he is currently a Columbia University law professor.

Daniel Richman was also, once upon a time, a leaker for James Comey. In fact, he leaked notes that Comey took during his time as FBI director under Donald Trump’s first administration to The New York Times, effectively kickstarting the special counsel investigation into Russiagate that went nowhere.

The New York Times did not point this out. One can easily guess why: Not just because it’s a conflict of interest, but because he’s now arguing against putting government documents out into the public square for reasons one can easily guess at.

.https://www.westernjournal.com/man-leaked-comey-writes-guest-essay-nyt-decrying-epstein-document-release/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=breaking-special&utm_campaign=news-alert&utm_content=2026-02-27

BJ -

Yeah 100%
This clown is in there.
Everyone that he knows in The Credentialed Class is in there.

Releasing info that they think helps them - good
Releasing info that they think hurts them - bad.

They are so transparent and too stupid to see it.

LOL that reminds me of you MAGAs. Yall were about it until elon said your orange messiah was all over the files. Then you flipped, because trump did.
Now, many of you even defend epstein.
You guys are disingenuous yoyos. Just like that guy.

 

[Auld Phart]

LOL that reminds me of you MAGAs. Yall were about it until elon said your orange messiah was all over the files. Then you flipped, because trump did.
Now, many of you even defend epstein.
You guys are disingenuous yoyos. Just like that guy.

Now, many of you even defend epstein.

who, for instance?

 

[SeaMajor7]

The hypocrisy of the demented LEFT is just off the charts.
Damn.

 

[ColonelAngus]

I went for a walk this morning.and these shells were on the beach. Crazy.

 

[TNHarley]

who, for instance?

There are threads. Many of them.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Comey would NEVER do anything untoward.

The man is above reproach.