They believed he was armed. They responded.
He was 'acting erratically' and was taken into custody.
That's all we know.
Don't y'all want more info before drawing conclusions?
The police never said he was acting erratically.
A report of an armed man acting erratically in the Wal-Mart parking lot Wednesday [/QUOTE].
Yes A REPORT from a PASSERBY.
After identifying the vehicle and person in question, Hughes said a decision was made on the scene for police to attempt contact. They were able to communicate with him and he voluntarily exited the vehicle. No weapon was found and the individual was taken into custody without incident less than 20 minutes after police arrived on scene.
The individual was talking on a cell phone at the time of the incident. It's likely that is the object the passerby identified as a gun.
The man complied. He voluntarily exited the vehicle. "
ERATIC", Who knows. He could be one of those obnoxious loud mouths when on a cell phone, could've been arguing (which is permissable). Could have been telling jokes and using a lot of body motion (which is permssable).The police did not confirm that he was erratic and it appears he followed their requests (I didn't say demands) he also DID NOT HAVE A GUN. YES they had to check out the report, which they did. He only had a cell phone. That's what they found. I want to know why that wasn't the end of it.
