Man Clarifies That 'Free Palestine' Means Palestinians Should Be Free To Kill The Jews

[Votto]

Man Clarifies That 'Free Palestine' Means Palestinians Should Be Free To Kill The Jews​

Politics·May 23, 2025 · BabylonBee.com

WASHINGTON, D.C. — A man arrested outside the Capital Jewish Museum in the downtown area reportedly sought to clarify that he was under the impression that the slogan "Free Palestine" really just means that Palestinians should be "free" to kill all the Jews.

Chicago resident Elias Rodriguez allegedly flew to D.C. for the express purpose of murdering Jews, but was happy to take a minute or two following his arrest to explain the meaning of the popular slogan used by activists worldwide.

"That's what the 'free' in 'Free Palestine' means," he said, elaborating on his alleged murder of two Israeli embassy staff members. "Why don't you want Palestinians to kill Jews? Are you a bigot?"

Supporters of a "free" Palestine corroborated the shooter's claim, expressing confusion that people did not realize that's what they meant the whole time. "This is not complicated," Congresswoman Ilhan Omar said. "This is one of the 'inalienable rights' Thomas Jefferson was talking about in the Declaration of Independence: the right of Palestinians and their supporters to kill Jews."

Congressional Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez reportedly differed from her congressional colleague. "Look, I don't think people should want to kill Jews," she said. "But they should be free to do so if they want to. This is democracy."

At publishing time, a bigoted judge had denied bail to Rodriguez, suggesting he — and the entire judicial system — may be under the control of the Jews.

 

[Votto]

Where are all the Lefty gun haters after this murderous act with a (gulp) gun!!!

 

[The Duke]

Yep, that murder was the culmination of all this "Free Palestine" bullshit and their self brainwashy
brain-smoothing chants like the SLA used on Patty Hearst.

 

[Lisa558]

Yep, that murder was the culmination of all this "Free Palestine" bullshit and their self brainwashy
brain-smoothing chants like the SLA used on Patty Hearst.

And yet, the Democrats are STILL insisting that it is “free speech” to incite the murder of Jews.

 

[shockedcanadian]

And yet, the Democrats are STILL insisting that it is “free speech” to incite the murder of Jews.

Lisa, I'm going to disagree with you here and I cannot waiver. It IS free speech. Free speech is really difficult but it is the core of America. In fact, the core of Judaism is this free debate of sensitive subjects as I've heard so many Rabbis debate.

I despise the hatred being spread against Israel and Jews and they should be called out. It is not illegal though, it is protected by your Constitution. A Constitution I would be willing to die to defend if I were an American.

Context is everything and him saying what he did after murdering two innocent people in a Jewish museum illustrates to me that this was a terror attack, though it probably doesn't reach the level of official definition as such by police agencies as they have a specific criteria. To me it's terrorism. He was clearly motivated by hate and political ideology. Irans government didn't do him any favours by openly celebrating his crimes. Sick sobs.

His statement will impact how his crime is viewed by a judge or jury though. This may increase his sentencing as it is illustrates premeditation, not someone with psychological problems who randomly attacked someone when he didn't take his meds (not that I would excuse that either), he was deliberate and targeted people for death based on their religion.

Free speech cannot in America cannot go down the path that is occurring in other Western nations, that is how governments REALLY suppress citizens.

In the U.K, we've had Jews arrested for speaking out against Islamic hatred as an example. This works both ways and the door cannot be opened a crack or we are all in trouble.

 

[Lisa558]

Lisa, I'm going to disagree with you here and I cannot waiver. It IS free speech. Free speech is really difficult but it is the core of America. In fact, the core of Judaism is this free debate of sensitive subjects as I've heard so many Rabbis debate.

Context is everything and him saying what he did after murdering two innocent people in a Jewish museum illustrates to me that this was a terror attack, though it probably doesn't reach the level of official definition as such. He was clearly motivated by hate and political ideology. Irans government didn't do him any favours by openly celebrating his crimes. Sick sobs.

His statement will impact how his crime is viewed by a judge or jury though. This may increase his sentencing as it is illustrates premeditation, not someone with psychological problems who randomly attacked someone when he didn't take his meds (not that I would excuse that either), he was deliberate and targeted people for death based on their religion.

Free speech cannot in America cannot go down the path that is occurring in other Western nations, that is how governments REALLY suppress citizens.

In the U.K, we've had Jews arrested for speaking out against Islamic hatred as an example. This works both ways and the door cannot be opened a crack or we are all in trouble.

Well, we disagree. It is clearly terrorism, indicated by the slogan of “Free Palestine” - the call to wipe out Israel from the river to the sea, and murder all her Jews - as promoted by the HAMAS terror group. And it was motivated by hate for a specific ethnic group, which is a hate crime.

We have got to stop the calls to murder Jews, or we are headed right back to Nazi Germany.

As to how his crime - the cold-blooded murder of two people who thought were Jews, and killed for that reason - will be interpreted, that will depend on how many leftists are on the jury, and predisposed to siding with antisemites.

 

[shockedcanadian]

Well, we disagree. It is clearly terrorism, indicated by the slogan of “Free Palestine” - the call to wipe out Israel from the river to the sea, and murder all her Jews. And it was motivated by hate for a specific ethnic group, which is a hate crime.

We have got to stop the calls to murder Jews, or we are headed right back to Nazi Germany.

Yes, you and I view it as terrorism. As with multiple cases in the past, some which has me shaking my head; the actual definition of terrorism isn't fulfilled.

Here is the FBI definition:

The FBI defines terrorism, domestic or international, as the unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a Government or civilian population in furtherance of political or social objectives

The last part of this definition is what is always difficult to attain. I would argue he is trying to encourage others through his actions and subsequent statement. We will see how they view it, 90% of the time these clearly focused attacks are dismissed as not being terrorism, I hope this receives the proper attention.

RIP to the victims. It is sickening. One of the people murdered even worked to get food resources to the people of Gaza. The irony cannot be lost.

 

[Lisa558]

Yes, you and I view it as terrorism. As with multiple cases in the past, some which has me shaking my head; the actual definition of terrorism isn't fulfilled.

Here is the FBI definition:

The FBI defines terrorism, domestic or international, as the unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a Government or civilian population in furtherance of political or social objectives

The last part of this definition is what is always difficult to attain. I would argue he is trying to encourage others through his actions and subsequent statement. We will see how they view it, 90% of the time these clearly focused attacks are dismissed as not being terrorism, I hope this receives the proper attention.

RIP to the victims. It is sickening. One of the people murdered even worked to get food resources to the people of Gaza. The irony cannot be lost.

And it can be argued that this murder against Jews (only one was Jewish but he thought both were) is being done to intimidate Jews into supporting the HAMAS side - or at least not outwardly supporting Israel.

The goal of terrorism, as you note, is to further a political agenda via intimidation. By silencing the opponents of that agenda by threat of violence - actual murder in this case - definitely meets that definition. Now Jews, or anyone supporting Israel, will think twice before attending pro-Israel events for fear of their safety.

Domestic Terrorism: Definitions, Terminology, and Methodology | Federal Bureau of Investigation

As required by the National Defense Authorization Act, the FBI and Department of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, have developed standard definitions of terminology related to domestic terrorism and uniform methodologies for tracking domestic...

www.fbi.gov

 

[Votto]

Lisa, I'm going to disagree with you here and I cannot waiver. It IS free speech. Free speech is really difficult but it is the core of America. In fact, the core of Judaism is this free debate of sensitive subjects as I've heard so many Rabbis debate.

I despise the hatred being spread against Israel and Jews and they should be called out. It is not illegal though, it is protected by your Constitution. A Constitution I would be willing to die to defend if I were an American.

Context is everything and him saying what he did after murdering two innocent people in a Jewish museum illustrates to me that this was a terror attack, though it probably doesn't reach the level of official definition as such by police agencies as they have a specific criteria. To me it's terrorism. He was clearly motivated by hate and political ideology. Irans government didn't do him any favours by openly celebrating his crimes. Sick sobs.

His statement will impact how his crime is viewed by a judge or jury though. This may increase his sentencing as it is illustrates premeditation, not someone with psychological problems who randomly attacked someone when he didn't take his meds (not that I would excuse that either), he was deliberate and targeted people for death based on their religion.

Free speech cannot in America cannot go down the path that is occurring in other Western nations, that is how governments REALLY suppress citizens.

In the U.K, we've had Jews arrested for speaking out against Islamic hatred as an example. This works both ways and the door cannot be opened a crack or we are all in trouble.

Not all free speech is equal.

For example, what we post here is not equal to what the entirety of Legacy Media and our political leaders say. It simply does not reach as many people, nor is what we say held is as high regard. It is therefore a different thing for me to call someone Hitler or a Nazi in comparison to these large institutions that do the same in lock step whom the public has become dependent upon to get their information about what is going on in the world and whom they have relied upon to inform them on how to vote. This mass propaganda can only lead to one result, and that is members of the public believing them on some level and acting out their own brand of social justice towards these Nazis Bonhoffer style.

After all, what is to be done with a Nazi? There is no reasoning with them as they are hell bent upon mass genocide and oppression. I have no doubt that Legacy media and the DNC and probably many Republicans secretly wanted and loved the fact that members of the public tried to assassinate Trump and that those Jews were murdered in cold blood, and it all had to do with Legacy media and the Democrat party who continually insist they are the equivalent of Nazis. In fact, many democrat members in Congress refuse to condemn 10/7 where many Jewish women and children were raped, tortured, and murdered as any leftovers were used as hostages for prolonged suffering. There is something profoundly evil and sick about that as there is those same members of Congress not being able to condemn the assassination of those Jews as morally wrong, let alone illegal. In short, these Congressmen should no longer have jobs.

I am reminded of the Covington kid who was accused of being a racist not too long ago. This high school kid is on a school trip to Washington DC, where he is confronted by a Left wing extremist who confronts him because he has a MAGA hat on. The video was shot in such a way to suggest that he was a racist, as it was displayed on Legacy media 24/7 as to the evils of being a Nazi racist thug. Next thing you know, they totally trash the kid nationally as death threat started pouring in and even members of the media suggesting he should meet his end. But then someone showed another video of the entire encounter, showing that the video was taken completely out of context, thus absolving the kid of any hints of racism. The kid later sued Legacy Media for millions and won.

It confounds me as to why the high school kid can sue them for defamation, but Trump and company cannot. Trump and even the nation of Israel should be able to sue the hell out of these media outlets that continuously broadcast false propaganda that is only meant to incite violence.

 

[Votto]

And it can be argued that this murder against Jews (only one was Jewish but he thought both were) is being done to intimidate Jews into supporting the HAMAS side - or at least not outwardly supporting Israel.

The goal of terrorism, as you note, is to further a political agenda via intimidation. By silencing the opponents of that agenda by threat of violence - actual murder in this case - definitely meets that definition. Now Jews, or anyone supporting Israel, will think twice before attending pro-Israel events for fear of their safety.

Domestic Terrorism: Definitions, Terminology, and Methodology | Federal Bureau of Investigation

As required by the National Defense Authorization Act, the FBI and Department of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, have developed standard definitions of terminology related to domestic terrorism and uniform methodologies for tracking domestic...

www.fbi.gov

The reasoning is, is that the Jews are engaged in mass genocide, so the world is free to do the same to them. There is therefore an open invitation worldwide to wage jihad on the Jew until the Zionists are all murdered Hitler style.

If you talk to any of these likeminded people, they will begin to spew out numbers of civilians Israel has murdered given to the public by none other than Hamas itself. And they will completely ignore the fact while telling you that Hamas uses its own citizens as shields against Israeli attack. In addition, it is no secret that Terrorist states like Iran who have been shouting death to Israel and the US since their revolution in the 70's has been funding Hamas and company with war supplies to do exactly what has happened today.

I in no way am suggesting that no war crimes have been committed by both sides, as war always seems to bring this out in both sides of any war in human history. But when you have one side openly murdering and raping civilians and filming it proudly for the world to see, that is another level that not even the Nazi regime would do. Hamas has reached a new level of.............of.....................I'm not sure there is even a word for it, but you know what I mean.

 

[Blaster]

Yep, that murder was the culmination of all this "Free Palestine" bullshit and their self brainwashy
brain-smoothing chants like the SLA used on Patty Hearst.

There never was a Palestine.

 

[Mack The Finger]

There never was a Palestine.

.
I listen to a video about the Holy Land and they were talking about groups of people that lived thousands of years ago...I never even heard of.