Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It’s always the sameWell, I for one thinks a man should never put his hands on a womanin any violent manner, but notice how they are ok with this white girl defending herself after this black kid put his hands on her, now when the roles are reversed the narrative changes. So, they will defend Caysen Allison murdering a Hispanic kid and they will vilify Karmelo Anthony when someone put their hands on him first and then they will try and tell us it is not racist.
You whine about reparationsWhites like him are the ones whining. They cry about everything, even though they are the ones who have been given everything.
Oh STFU!Why can a white person think they can say something like this when we have WHITE MAN in the white house convicted of 34 felonies?
How about not spending your day looking for something bad done by non white people?
I hope a lawsuit against the school pays biglyThere is more than racism and sexism going on here.
It is all about legal liability--- lawyers and the courts now assert so much control over everything that the school was merely acting in its own preservation irregardless of the interests of their student. Punishing the black and holding him responsible risks a huge and costly media if not public backlash from the BLM/Black Panther community. So they held the girl equally responsible just so they can honestly say there is no "racial bias" (because nothing with blacks is ever done because of the usual reasons as all the rest of us, anything affecting them must be "racially motivated.")
- Being ill-concerned and reticent during the black's aggression.
- Not becoming proactive until the white girl started to defend herself.
- Treating the clear victim as non-different from the attacker who started the whole thing.
In reality, the girl should be commended and honored for standing up to obvious aggression and attack, while the football kid who attacked her, should have been suspended much longer if not outright ejected from the school.
What Father?I can't disagree with that, but I know I will have to be ready to deal with his father as well.
Well of course the male got away with it because of his minority status.
![]()
Girl Tackled and Brutalized by 'Bully' Football Player, Dad Furious After School Calls It 'Mutual Confrontation'
A father whose daughter was assaulted in a Texas high school is trying to get fair treatment after she was pounded in a classroom.www.thegatewaypundit.com
This is what happens when “racism” is attributed to any action taken against a black, no matter how deserved.There is more than racism and sexism going on here.
It is all about legal liability--- lawyers and the courts now assert so much control over everything that the school was merely acting in its own preservation irregardless of the interests of their student. Punishing the black and holding him responsible risks a huge and costly media if not public backlash from the BLM/Black Panther community. So they held the girl equally responsible just so they can honestly say there is no "racial bias" (because nothing with blacks is ever done because of the usual reasons as all the rest of us, anything affecting them must be "racially motivated.")
- Being ill-concerned and reticent during the black's aggression.
- Not becoming proactive until the white girl started to defend herself.
- Treating the clear victim as non-different from the attacker who started the whole thing.
In reality, the girl should be commended and honored for standing up to obvious aggression and attack, while the football kid who attacked her, should have been suspended much longer if not outright ejected from the school.
Fk with someone's kid and find out.What Father?
This situation arises from the fact that he wanted to date her, but she did not want to date him. A woman's right to say no—to a date or anything else—is absolute and beyond questioning. She can refuse to date someone for any reason, including personal preference, intuition, or even factors like race. Anything else would undermine her autonomy.Fk with someone's kid and find out.
Ok, I agree you are free to date or not date whoever you choose.This situation arises from the fact that he wanted to date her, but she did not want to date him. A woman's right to say no—to a date or anything else—is absolute and beyond questioning. She can refuse to date someone for any reason, including personal preference, intuition, or even factors like race. Anything else would undermine her autonomy.
Ok, why are you posting this to me? I never said a woman can't choose who she wants to date.Perhaps a woman only wants to date men whom she believes she might marry, and she wants her children to resemble her. There is nothing wrong with that. Some Black women may prefer to have children who share more of their African ancestry rather than a predominantly European appearance. I do not question that right.
As I said, a woman's right to say no is absolute and should not be challenged.
This is what happens when “racism” is attributed to any action taken against a black, no matter how deserved.
First. the teacher was afraid to intervene when the black started assaulted the white.
Second, the school expelled them both so as to “prove” that the black wasn’t expelled for racist reasons. The district manager even acknowledged that the white acted in self-defense but, in order to explain away why the girl was still expelled, she said that “self-defense doesn’t avert punishment.”
^^^ There was a shooting at a school here in east TN years ago. It was somewhere in Knoxville. A boy opened fire and shot at the main principal as well as the two assistant principals if my memory serves me correctly. One of the assistant principals was killed that day. Does this mean that he shouldn't have been an assistant principal if he couldn't do his part in controlling what went on at that school? The only other thing that I remember is that his last name was Bruce.
God bless you and his family always!!!
Holly
This situation arises from the fact that he wanted to date her, but she did not want to date him. ....
=Are we sure about that? Love a link. If I missed it, I am sorry.
Utter nonsense......to begin with 'baiting' whatever it means or does not mean is not a legal concept. What the black bully male football player did is called assault.I never said that she should've been, but I know how other people can and will look at it and it is because of her decision to get physical in return. Baiting is what the guy will be said to be guilty of, and when people give into those who bait, those who give in unfortunately go down just as hard if not harder.
God bless you and the girl always!!!
Holly (a girl who is on her side)