Making friends with Carbon Dioxide

Robert W

Former Democrat but long term Republican.
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2022
Messages
24,281
Reaction score
11,775
Points
1,138
Carbon Dioxide deserves to have millions more Friends. And why is this? Greening the planet for one thing. Gardens must have Carbon Dioxide as do Crops of all kinds. Your forests must get CO2. Greenhouses must get it. For the survival of man, we must get Carbon Dioxide.
“Fossil Fuels Are the Greenest Energy Sources” by Dr. Indur Goklany is an example of our work. Did you know that up to 50% of the globe has experienced an increase in vegetation and that 70% of the greening is attributed to plant fertilization by carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels? Or that nearly 200,000 square kilometers of the southern Sahara have been converted to a lush grassland from desert?

Few have heard that doubling atmospheric CO2 from its current concentration of 420 ppm would significantly increase agricultural productivity and have little effect on the climate.

It appears that some of this knowledge has reached Canada because Alberta’s ruling Unified Conservative Party (UCP) recently approved a resolution that promotes the salutary effects of CO2 and endorses an outright rejection of the national government’s net zero policy.

“It is estimated that (atmospheric) CO2 levels need to be above 150 ppm (parts per million) to ensure the survival of plant life,” says the proposal for a resolution eventually adopted by the party. “The Earth needs more CO2 to support life and to increase plant yields, both of which will contribute to the health and prosperity of all Albertans.”

The UCP calls for abandoning CO2’s designation as a pollutant and for recognizing the gas as “a foundational nutrient for all life on Earth.”

The UCP’s action was not well received by the likes of DeSmog, an online platform of climate alarmists, which called the party’s resolution “a brazen display of climate science denial that harkens back to the 1990s fossil fuel industry playbook.”


1732133317296.png
 
Last edited:
Breathing straight carbon dioxide will kill ... maybe not pollutant but certainly deadly ... is that the quibble? ...
 
Carbon Dioxide deserves to have millions more Friends. And why is this? Greening the planet for one thing. Gardens must have Carbon Dioxide as do Crops of all kinds. Your forests must get CO2. Greenhouses must get it. For the survival of man, we must get Carbon Dioxide.
“Fossil Fuels Are the Greenest Energy Sources” by Dr. Indur Goklany is an example of our work. Did you know that up to 50% of the globe has experienced an increase in vegetation and that 70% of the greening is attributed to plant fertilization by carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels? Or that nearly 200,000 square kilometers of the southern Sahara have been converted to a lush grassland from desert?

Few have heard that doubling atmospheric CO2 from its current concentration of 420 ppm would significantly increase agricultural productivity and have little effect on the climate.

It appears that some of this knowledge has reached Canada because Alberta’s ruling Unified Conservative Party (UCP) recently approved a resolution that promotes the salutary effects of CO2 and endorses an outright rejection of the national government’s net zero policy.

“It is estimated that (atmospheric) CO2 levels need to be above 150 ppm (parts per million) to ensure the survival of plant life,” says the proposal for a resolution eventually adopted by the party. “The Earth needs more CO2 to support life and to increase plant yields, both of which will contribute to the health and prosperity of all Albertans.”

The UCP calls for abandoning CO2’s designation as a pollutant and for recognizing the gas as “a foundational nutrient for all life on Earth.”

The UCP’s action was not well received by the likes of DeSmog, an online platform of climate alarmists, which called the party’s resolution “a brazen display of climate science denial that harkens back to the 1990s fossil fuel industry playbook.”


View attachment 1044333
The Green New Deal Is Deletion

Bad news for the Zero-Growth Gurus. How can they impoverish and enslave us if you reveal the true cause of Jolly Green Giant's joy?
 
Breathing straight carbon dioxide will kill ... maybe not pollutant but certainly deadly ... is that the quibble? ...
Let's not suggest humans do that. Very bad idea.
 
Carbon Dioxide deserves to have millions more Friends. And why is this? Greening the planet for one thing. Gardens must have Carbon Dioxide as do Crops of all kinds. Your forests must get CO2. Greenhouses must get it. For the survival of man, we must get Carbon Dioxide.
“Fossil Fuels Are the Greenest Energy Sources” by Dr. Indur Goklany is an example of our work. Did you know that up to 50% of the globe has experienced an increase in vegetation and that 70% of the greening is attributed to plant fertilization by carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels? Or that nearly 200,000 square kilometers of the southern Sahara have been converted to a lush grassland from desert?

Few have heard that doubling atmospheric CO2 from its current concentration of 420 ppm would significantly increase agricultural productivity and have little effect on the climate.

It appears that some of this knowledge has reached Canada because Alberta’s ruling Unified Conservative Party (UCP) recently approved a resolution that promotes the salutary effects of CO2 and endorses an outright rejection of the national government’s net zero policy.

“It is estimated that (atmospheric) CO2 levels need to be above 150 ppm (parts per million) to ensure the survival of plant life,” says the proposal for a resolution eventually adopted by the party. “The Earth needs more CO2 to support life and to increase plant yields, both of which will contribute to the health and prosperity of all Albertans.”

The UCP calls for abandoning CO2’s designation as a pollutant and for recognizing the gas as “a foundational nutrient for all life on Earth.”

The UCP’s action was not well received by the likes of DeSmog, an online platform of climate alarmists, which called the party’s resolution “a brazen display of climate science denial that harkens back to the 1990s fossil fuel industry playbook.”


View attachment 1044333
 
 
Carbon dioxide is a waste product ... and we use our atmosphere as a sewer ... I'm not saying if this is right or wrong, just that's what we're doing ...
Carbon Dioxide supports life on Earth. We know it feeds plants. We eat plants.
 
Do farts affect SAP?
Carbon dioxide is so ineffective it amounts to around .04% of the atmosphere.

As of 2023, the concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the Earth's atmosphere is around 419.3 parts per million (ppm), which means that out of every million parts of air, 419.3 parts are carbon dioxide;
 
Carbon dioxide is so ineffective it amounts to around .04% of the atmosphere.

As of 2023, the concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the Earth's atmosphere is around 419.3 parts per million (ppm), which means that out of every million parts of air, 419.3 parts are carbon dioxide;

Why are you scared? ... oxygen is far more dangerous than carbon dioxide ... breathe deeper ...
 
Carbon dioxide is so ineffective it amounts to around .04% of the atmosphere.

As of 2023, the concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the Earth's atmosphere is around 419.3 parts per million (ppm), which means that out of every million parts of air, 419.3 parts are carbon dioxide;

So ineffective because there's so little of it yet

Carbon Dioxide supports life on Earth. We know it feeds plants. We eat plants.
 
Breathing straight carbon dioxide will kill ... maybe not pollutant but certainly deadly ... is that the quibble? ...
--and breathing nothing but nitrogen will also kill. Hmm, there's 2,000 as much nitrogen as there is CO2 in air, shouldn't we be more worried about N than CO2?
 
Carbon dioxide is a waste product ...

Out of our breath. But, oddly enough, our waste product is NEEDED by plant life. Plants, in turn, give off oxygen as their waste. We kinda need oxygen. So it’s good we give them CO2 and that they give us O2.
and we use our atmosphere as a sewer ...
yeah. What with all that breathing.
I'm not saying if this is right or wrong, just that's what we're doing ...
Yep. Breathing. 10 out of 10 doctors recommended it.
 
Back
Top Bottom