Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 126,711
- 98,396
- 3,635
True he did, but we learned the lessons of taxes like that during the Clinton admin.
It was the law longer under Bush than it was under Clinton.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
True he did, but we learned the lessons of taxes like that during the Clinton admin.
Right you areBush signed that into law.
The interest on a whole lot of things was deductible before Reagan, so if you want to bring back the high tax rates he lowered, be prepared to bring back the deductions he eliminated as well.Or car leases?
That would mean that Social Security would no longer be taxable… UI benefits tooThe interest on a whole lot of things was deductible before Reagan, so if you want to bring back the high tax rates he lowered, be prepared to bring back the deductions he eliminated as well.
Yup. Reagan made some real trade-offs to lower those tax rates. Trade-offs that most tax increasers today don't remember.That would mean that Social Security would no longer be taxable… UI benefits too
Putting taxes on social security and unemployment is not lowering tax rates. It’s increasing taxes on the poor and middle classYup. Reagan made some real trade-offs to lower those tax rates. Trade-offs that most tax increasers today don't remember.
You're conflating different things. In order to get those lower tax rates, deductions were eliminated and other taxes were increased. That just means that most of those screeching for the tax rates before Reagan would never be willing to make the trade-offs necessary to go back to them.Putting taxes on social security and unemployment is not lowering tax rates. It’s increasing taxes on the poor and middle class
Republicans have done all that is needed to raise the debt ceiling and avoid defaulting in our debt and wrecking the economy.
Why are Schumer and Biden driving the country off a cliff?