Majority believe Feds did J6

[Esdraelon]

Majority of MAGA-tards

You seem to be admitting that 60+% of Americans are MAGA.

 

[toobfreak]

A majority of whom? Because a clear majority saw the violence unfold on 01-06.

Ha! Now you saw all the violence unfold that day? Just yesterday, when I told him I watched the protest that day, one of your lefty friends here said the truth was really buried inside the 44,000 hours of secret video the FBI is sitting on!

And just tonight, I saw more video released showing unguarded unlocked rear doors with people just walking in, cops not even wearing riot gear and other police just walking around casually with the protesters!

 

[BULLDOG]

The majority of these people believe the feds did it.

 

[toobfreak]

The majority of these people believe the feds did it.

Hey Bully, I never knew your folks were all a bunch of inbreds?! Say Hi to cousin Rufus for me!

 

[Smokin' OP]

The majority of these people believe the feds did it.

Just like these retards.

 

[HaShev]

Those who called what Pelosi said fake news have to now answer:
1) what did she mean by "we would have failed"?
2)why doctor the tapes (added audio in a certain spot where there was none), and censor tapes?
3)why did she stand down orders to order more National Guard?

 

[Smokin' OP]

Those who called what Pelosi said fake news have to now answer:
1) what did she mean by "we would have failed"?

Pelosi said we would have failed the American people, if they didn't proceed to certify the election result.

2)why doctor the tapes (added audio in a certain spot where there was none), and censor tapes?

Sure.................
Pelosi isn't Carlson.

3)why did she stand down orders to order more National Guard?

She didn't.
Pelosi has no authority to call the National Guard.
That would be the Sergeant-of-Arms.

So.....................................Why would they even need the National Guard for a "protest"?

 

[HaShev]

Pelosi said we would have failed the American people, if they didn't proceed to certify the election result.

Sure.................
Pelosi isn't Carlson.

She didn't.
Pelosi has no authority to call the National Guard.
That would be the Sergeant-of-Arms.

So.....................................Why would they even need the National Guard for a "protest"?

Can't be, she already knew she was going against the American voters when she was part of the coup to overturn the 2016 election and even used the same assault on democracy for the 2018 midterm.
If she cared would her own district be in such shambles?
To answer your question: Because it was not just a voter integrity protest by Trumpers and Bernie Bros, it was a lockdown and fed up protest in general by all groups, the narrative focused only on one for it's propaganda needs, so bad was that propaganda and staging that they burried photos of Black maga protesters and claimed there was only one single person of color there. Google litterally whitewashed the scene in their image search and Yahoo did that rediculous 1 person protested story. ASK YOURSELF WHY, IF IT WAS A LEGIT SITUATION?

 

[Smokin' OP]

Can't be, she already knew she was going against the American voters when she was part of the coup to overturn the 2016 election and even used the same assault on democracy for the 2018 midterm.

WTF?
You have some deep delusions going on.
Drop the orange kool-aid chaser after your coffee.

If she cared would her own district be in such shambles?

 

[HaShev]

WTF?
You have some deep delusions going on.
Drop the orange kool-aid chaser after your coffee.

I THINK you are confused, because you have voter fraud on your mind via the topic, but I am discussing The KNOWN FALSE RUSSIA SHAM used by Pelosi to try an oust a duly elected president, that's called a treasonous coup whether you accept that or not, it is what they did and even Bill Barr and Durham and anyone who knows the law will tell you that is fact. To not admit what it was means you are the delusional one, and not just confused by your assumption of what I was talking about.
Note: we were talking about Pelosi's concern for the Voters wishes, this proved she doesn't and did not not care what the voters voted for.

 

[Smokin' OP]

I THINK you are confused, because you have voter fraud on your mind via the topic, but I am discussing The KNOWN FALSE RUSSIA SHAM used by Pelosi to try an oust a duly elected president,

You're delusional.

Mueller Report Shows Depth of Connections Between ...​

The New York Times
https://www.nytimes.com › U.S. › Politics
Jan 26, 2019 — Donald J. Trump and 18 of his associates had at least 140 contacts with Russian nationals and WikiLeaks, or their intermediaries, during the ...

WHY was the Trump regime contacting Russia, even ONCE?

that's called a treasonous coup whether you accept that or not, it is what they did and even Bill Barr and Durham and anyone who knows the law will tell you that is fact. To not admit what it was means you are the delusional one, and not just confused by your assumption of what I was talking about.

The only treasonous "coup" was attempted by Trump and his cult.

Orange kool-aid is NOT your friend.

 

[frigidweirdo]

J6 Videos: 65% Now Suspect Feds Provoked Riot

Following Tucker Carlson’s release of previously unseen videos from the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol, more voters now believe it may have been provoked by undercover agents.

www.rasmussenreports.com

Just think what they might think if they saw them all

From the very people who's polling is always way, WAY different (and way, WAY more conservative) than anyone else's...)

No one believes Rasmussen...

 

[HaShev]

You're delusional.

Mueller Report Shows Depth of Connections Between ...​

View attachment 792156
The New York Times
https://www.nytimes.com › U.S. › Politics
Jan 26, 2019 — Donald J. Trump and 18 of his associates had at least 140 contacts with Russian nationals and WikiLeaks, or their intermediaries, during the ...

WHY was the Trump regime contacting Russia, even ONCE?


The only treasonous "coup" was attempted by Trump and his cult.

Orange kool-aid is NOT your friend.

You just proved my point:
Mueller illegally did not recuse himself (friends with Comey) and he hired 2 Clinton lawyers- again conflict of interest- highly illegal. Mueller investigation went on till the midterm to manipulate elections then magically revealed there was no there there....the Durham report TRUMPS your ignorant use of Mueller.
But thanks for proving my point=YOU JUST PROVED THEY DON'T RESPECT THE VOTERS! - checkmate!

 

[Smokin' OP]

You just proved my point:
Mueller illegally did not recuse himself (friends with Comey) and he hired 2 Clinton lawyers- again conflict of interest- highly illegal. Mueller investigation went on till the midterm to manipulate elections then magically revealed there was no there there....the Durham report TRUMPS your ignorant use of Mueller.
But thanks for proving my point=YOU JUST PROVED THEY DON'T RESPECT THE VOTERS! - checkmate!

What did Durham prove?
NOT a thing.

A special prosecutor found that the FBI rushed into its investigation of ties between Russia and Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign and relied too much on raw and unconfirmed intelligence as he concluded a four-year probe that fell far short of the former president’s prediction that the “crime of the century” would be uncovered.

The report Monday from special counsel John Durham represents the long-awaited culmination of an investigation that Trump and allies had claimed would expose massive wrongdoing by law enforcement and intelligence officials. Instead, Durham’s investigation delivered underwhelming results, with prosecutors securing a guilty plea from a little-known FBI employee but losing the only two criminal cases they took to trial.

 

[HaShev]

What did Durham prove?
NOT a thing.

A special prosecutor found that the FBI rushed into its investigation of ties between Russia and Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign and relied too much on raw and unconfirmed intelligence as he concluded a four-year probe that fell far short of the former president’s prediction that the “crime of the century” would be uncovered.

The report Monday from special counsel John Durham represents the long-awaited culmination of an investigation that Trump and allies had claimed would expose massive wrongdoing by law enforcement and intelligence officials. Instead, Durham’s investigation delivered underwhelming results, with prosecutors securing a guilty plea from a little-known FBI employee but losing the only two criminal cases they took to trial.

You just broke your own standard thus called yourself delusional, -checkmate again!

 

[SweetSue92]

What did Durham prove?
NOT a thing.

A special prosecutor found that the FBI rushed into its investigation of ties between Russia and Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign and relied too much on raw and unconfirmed intelligence as he concluded a four-year probe that fell far short of the former president’s prediction that the “crime of the century” would be uncovered.

The report Monday from special counsel John Durham represents the long-awaited culmination of an investigation that Trump and allies had claimed would expose massive wrongdoing by law enforcement and intelligence officials. Instead, Durham’s investigation delivered underwhelming results, with prosecutors securing a guilty plea from a little-known FBI employee but losing the only two criminal cases they took to trial.

That's what you're all telling yourself in your echo chamber, sure.

OUTSIDE of that, look what's happening. People don't even believe the J6 event was organic anymore.

 

[Smokin' OP]

That's what you're all telling yourself in your echo chamber, sure.

OUTSIDE of that, look what's happening. People don't even believe the J6 event was organic anymore.

Sure................in YOUR echo chamber.

Meanwhile.........back in reality..........

More than 1,033 people have been arrested for storming the U.S. Capitol building on Jan. 6, 2021, with charges ranging from obstruction of an official proceeding to assault. But 28 months after the attempted insurrection, a significant number of rioters are still awaiting their sentencing.

Around 47% of those arrested—485 individuals—have received criminal sentences, while the rest are waiting for their trials or haven’t yet reached plea agreements. According to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia, 277 defendants were sentenced to periods of incarceration, with longer prison terms for those who engaged in violence or threats.

 

[SweetSue92]

Sure................in YOUR echo chamber.

Meanwhile.........back in reality..........

More than 1,033 people have been arrested for storming the U.S. Capitol building on Jan. 6, 2021, with charges ranging from obstruction of an official proceeding to assault. But 28 months after the attempted insurrection, a significant number of rioters are still awaiting their sentencing.

Around 47% of those arrested—485 individuals—have received criminal sentences, while the rest are waiting for their trials or haven’t yet reached plea agreements. According to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia, 277 defendants were sentenced to periods of incarceration, with longer prison terms for those who engaged in violence or threats.

So?

All that proves is that the DC courts are crooked. And Americans are increasingly seeing that more clearly.

What happens next? After Americans see that the whole thing is crooked and corrupt?

That's the only question that remains, whether you p1ss into the wind or not.

 

[HaShev]

Sure................in YOUR echo chamber.

Meanwhile.........back in reality..........

More than 1,033 people have been arrested for storming the U.S. Capitol building on Jan. 6, 2021, with charges ranging from obstruction of an official proceeding to assault. But 28 months after the attempted insurrection, a significant number of rioters are still awaiting their sentencing.

Around 47% of those arrested—485 individuals—have received criminal sentences, while the rest are waiting for their trials or haven’t yet reached plea agreements. According to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia, 277 defendants were sentenced to periods of incarceration, with longer prison terms for those who engaged in violence or threats.

When you used the word insurrection you lost your argument.
Furthermore you can't be obstructing what we now know and proved was an illegitimate congress created by a real insurrection and real coup. And by the way you admitted this by boasting about arresting political rivals-oops!
Yes those who broke property (windows) and weren't escorted in should be arrested, but clearly it's been proven to be weaponized to arrest and intimidate voters once again proving my point, that Pelosi does not care about voters andctheir rights to choose, which was your poor argument.

 

[Smokin' OP]

So?

All that proves is that the DC courts are crooked. And Americans are increasingly seeing that more clearly.

Seeing more "Clearly"?
Through the intoxication of orange kool-aid?

What happens next? After Americans see that the whole thing is crooked and corrupt?

Sure...................
Wasn't Durham going to expose all the corruption?
THAT worked so well.

That's the only question that remains, whether you p1ss into the wind or not.

Evidently you will.