MAGA Questions Judge Boasberg Assignment to Signal Lawsuit: 'Rigged'

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

Question: Does anyone know exactly how the court system determines which judge to assign to a specific case? It would be interesting to know if they use some sort of randomly generated assignment system or if it's just Trump's "bad luck" catching up to him.

While everyone of course is entitled to their own opinion, if anyone has actual information on how they go about this, I'd love to hear what insight you have.

MSN

President Donald Trump's MAGA base has expressed skepticism after U.S. District Judge James Boasberg—who presided over the migrant deportation case—was also assigned to a new lawsuit involving high-ranking Cabinet officials' messaging of military activity via the Signal app.​

​

​

Newsweek reached out to the Department of Justice (DOJ) via online form Wednesday for comment.​

​

Why It Matters​

Boasberg has been at the center of MAGA fury this month as he has presided over the case involving the Trump administration's speedy deportation of migrants through his invocation of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798.​

​

The act is a wartime law that grants the commander in chief authority to detain or deport non-citizens. The implementation was blocked in federal court and has thus sparked a contentious legal back-and-forth with Boasberg, a chief judge.​

​

The Trump administration this week also faced intense scrutiny after a report in The Atlantic by editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg said he was added to a thread on the encrypted app Signal that included Cabinet officials discussing military action against the Iran-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen.​

​

What To Know​

In the wake of the Signal scandal, the administration was hit with a lawsuit on Tuesday by nonpartisan watchdog group American Oversight.​

​

The lawsuit accuses Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and others of defying the Administrative Procedure Act and the Federal Records Act. The case was assigned to Boasberg on Wednesday in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.​

​

Reports of Boasberg's new assignment sparked MAGA reaction across social media.​

​

​

President Donald Trump is seen alongside U.S. National Security Adviser Michael Waltz, U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance, and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, listening to a question from a reporter during a meeting in the Oval Office of the White House on March 13, 2025, in Washington, D.C. (Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)​

What People Are Saying​

Republican Representative Jim Jordan of Ohio on Tuesday, on Benny Johnson's podcast The Benny Show: "You're right it's supposed to be random," Jordan said responding to Johnson. "Supposed to be random, but Judge Boasberg could recuse himself from this case ... if there's a preceded bias, a potential for bias, if there's a conflict."​

​

​

Jordan continued: "Well I think there's a lot of people who think there's a bias. After all, as you mentioned Benny, this is the guy who said, 'turn the flight around, bring all the bad guys, the hardened criminals who were here illegally who did terrible things, bring those folks back to America.' This is the judge who was there on the FISA [Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act] court when they issued the warrants to spy on President Trump's campaign eight years ago. So, there's a history there and yet no, no recusal, he's going to get the case."​

​

Jordan went on the blast attorney and CNN analyst Norm Eisen, who regularly bashes Trump, adding: "They had that lawsuit ready to go, go figure."​

​

Trump ally Mike Davis on X, formerly Twitter, on Wednesday: "Dear House Judiciary Chairman @Jim_Jordan: Order Chief DC Obama Judge Jeb Boasberg to come explain his court's 'random' assignment of cases."​

​

​

Activist and author Jack Posobiec on X, on Wednesday, reacting to Boasberg's new assignment: "Heavy artillery moving into position. The Op is on"​

​

Conservative influencer Nick Sotor on X, on Wednesday: " WTF?! Judge Boasberg, the activist judge BLOCKING Trump from deporting violent gang members, intentionally DELAYED the release of Hillary Clinton's emails until after the 2016 election He's also now 'coincidentally' presiding over the Signal case This is RIGGED! How do people not see that?"​

​

What Happens Next​

The administration's appeal in the deportation case was rejected on Wednesday afternoon in a ruling of 2-1.​

 

[konradv]

Question: Does anyone know exactly how the court system determines which judge to assign to a specific case? It would be interesting to know if they use some sort of randomly generated assignment system or if it's just Trump's "bad luck" catching up to him.

While everyone of course is entitled to their own opinion, if anyone has actual information on how they go about this, I'd love to hear what insight you have.

MSN

President Donald Trump's MAGA base has expressed skepticism after U.S. District Judge James Boasberg—who presided over the migrant deportation case—was also assigned to a new lawsuit involving high-ranking Cabinet officials' messaging of military activity via the Signal app.​

​

​

Newsweek reached out to the Department of Justice (DOJ) via online form Wednesday for comment.​

​

Why It Matters​

Boasberg has been at the center of MAGA fury this month as he has presided over the case involving the Trump administration's speedy deportation of migrants through his invocation of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798.​

​

The act is a wartime law that grants the commander in chief authority to detain or deport non-citizens. The implementation was blocked in federal court and has thus sparked a contentious legal back-and-forth with Boasberg, a chief judge.​

​

The Trump administration this week also faced intense scrutiny after a report in The Atlantic by editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg said he was added to a thread on the encrypted app Signal that included Cabinet officials discussing military action against the Iran-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen.​

​

What To Know​

In the wake of the Signal scandal, the administration was hit with a lawsuit on Tuesday by nonpartisan watchdog group American Oversight.​

​

The lawsuit accuses Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and others of defying the Administrative Procedure Act and the Federal Records Act. The case was assigned to Boasberg on Wednesday in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.​

​

Reports of Boasberg's new assignment sparked MAGA reaction across social media.​

​

​

President Donald Trump is seen alongside U.S. National Security Adviser Michael Waltz, U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance, and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, listening to a question from a reporter during a meeting in the Oval Office of the White House on March 13, 2025, in Washington, D.C. (Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)​

What People Are Saying​

Republican Representative Jim Jordan of Ohio on Tuesday, on Benny Johnson's podcast The Benny Show: "You're right it's supposed to be random," Jordan said responding to Johnson. "Supposed to be random, but Judge Boasberg could recuse himself from this case ... if there's a preceded bias, a potential for bias, if there's a conflict."​

​

​

Jordan continued: "Well I think there's a lot of people who think there's a bias. After all, as you mentioned Benny, this is the guy who said, 'turn the flight around, bring all the bad guys, the hardened criminals who were here illegally who did terrible things, bring those folks back to America.' This is the judge who was there on the FISA [Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act] court when they issued the warrants to spy on President Trump's campaign eight years ago. So, there's a history there and yet no, no recusal, he's going to get the case."​

​

Jordan went on the blast attorney and CNN analyst Norm Eisen, who regularly bashes Trump, adding: "They had that lawsuit ready to go, go figure."​

​

Trump ally Mike Davis on X, formerly Twitter, on Wednesday: "Dear House Judiciary Chairman @Jim_Jordan: Order Chief DC Obama Judge Jeb Boasberg to come explain his court's 'random' assignment of cases."​

​

​

Activist and author Jack Posobiec on X, on Wednesday, reacting to Boasberg's new assignment: "Heavy artillery moving into position. The Op is on"​

​

Conservative influencer Nick Sotor on X, on Wednesday: " WTF?! Judge Boasberg, the activist judge BLOCKING Trump from deporting violent gang members, intentionally DELAYED the release of Hillary Clinton's emails until after the 2016 election He's also now 'coincidentally' presiding over the Signal case This is RIGGED! How do people not see that?"​

​

What Happens Next​

The administration's appeal in the deportation case was rejected on Wednesday afternoon in a ruling of 2-1.​

MAGAnauts are the biggest bunch of snowflakes!

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Question: Does anyone know exactly how the court system determines which judge to assign to a specific case? It would be interesting to know if they use some sort of randomly generated assignment system or if it's just Trump's "bad luck" catching up to him.

While everyone of course is entitled to their own opinion, if anyone has actual information on how they go about this, I'd love to hear what insight you have.

MSN

President Donald Trump's MAGA base has expressed skepticism after U.S. District Judge James Boasberg—who presided over the migrant deportation case—was also assigned to a new lawsuit involving high-ranking Cabinet officials' messaging of military activity via the Signal app.​

​

​

Newsweek reached out to the Department of Justice (DOJ) via online form Wednesday for comment.​

​

Why It Matters​

Boasberg has been at the center of MAGA fury this month as he has presided over the case involving the Trump administration's speedy deportation of migrants through his invocation of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798.​

​

The act is a wartime law that grants the commander in chief authority to detain or deport non-citizens. The implementation was blocked in federal court and has thus sparked a contentious legal back-and-forth with Boasberg, a chief judge.​

​

The Trump administration this week also faced intense scrutiny after a report in The Atlantic by editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg said he was added to a thread on the encrypted app Signal that included Cabinet officials discussing military action against the Iran-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen.​

​

What To Know​

In the wake of the Signal scandal, the administration was hit with a lawsuit on Tuesday by nonpartisan watchdog group American Oversight.​

​

The lawsuit accuses Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and others of defying the Administrative Procedure Act and the Federal Records Act. The case was assigned to Boasberg on Wednesday in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.​

​

Reports of Boasberg's new assignment sparked MAGA reaction across social media.​

​

​

President Donald Trump is seen alongside U.S. National Security Adviser Michael Waltz, U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance, and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, listening to a question from a reporter during a meeting in the Oval Office of the White House on March 13, 2025, in Washington, D.C. (Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)​

What People Are Saying​

Republican Representative Jim Jordan of Ohio on Tuesday, on Benny Johnson's podcast The Benny Show: "You're right it's supposed to be random," Jordan said responding to Johnson. "Supposed to be random, but Judge Boasberg could recuse himself from this case ... if there's a preceded bias, a potential for bias, if there's a conflict."​

​

​

Jordan continued: "Well I think there's a lot of people who think there's a bias. After all, as you mentioned Benny, this is the guy who said, 'turn the flight around, bring all the bad guys, the hardened criminals who were here illegally who did terrible things, bring those folks back to America.' This is the judge who was there on the FISA [Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act] court when they issued the warrants to spy on President Trump's campaign eight years ago. So, there's a history there and yet no, no recusal, he's going to get the case."​

​

Jordan went on the blast attorney and CNN analyst Norm Eisen, who regularly bashes Trump, adding: "They had that lawsuit ready to go, go figure."​

​

Trump ally Mike Davis on X, formerly Twitter, on Wednesday: "Dear House Judiciary Chairman @Jim_Jordan: Order Chief DC Obama Judge Jeb Boasberg to come explain his court's 'random' assignment of cases."​

​

​

Activist and author Jack Posobiec on X, on Wednesday, reacting to Boasberg's new assignment: "Heavy artillery moving into position. The Op is on"​

​

Conservative influencer Nick Sotor on X, on Wednesday: " WTF?! Judge Boasberg, the activist judge BLOCKING Trump from deporting violent gang members, intentionally DELAYED the release of Hillary Clinton's emails until after the 2016 election He's also now 'coincidentally' presiding over the Signal case This is RIGGED! How do people not see that?"​

​

What Happens Next​

The administration's appeal in the deportation case was rejected on Wednesday afternoon in a ruling of 2-1.​

LOL. A sea of incompetence.

 

[toobfreak]

Question: Does anyone know exactly how the court system determines which judge to assign to a specific case?

It is random, by rotation, unless one judge's workload is particularly heavy then it can be handed off to another generally. So it is highly unusual for Boasberg to get both cases, especially considering that he was off and not even supposed to be there the day he took the first (deportation) case.

President Donald Trump's MAGA base has expressed skepticism after U.S. District Judge James Boasberg—who presided over the migrant deportation case—was also assigned to a new lawsuit involving high-ranking Cabinet officials' messaging of military activity via the Signal app.

The Signal communication was asuredly leaked and sent to the Atlantic by an inside democrat mole, then the Atlantic published it to embarrass Hegseth, and even though another guy (Waltz) already has taken responsibility for the error, this is all about trying to get Hegseth to resign.

Both of these incidents are being manufactured by the democrats trying to obstruct Trump's administration again.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

It is random, by rotation, unless one judge's workload is particularly heavy then it can be handed off to another generally. So it is highly unusual for Boasberg to get both cases, especially considering that he was off and not even supposed to be there the day he took the first (deportation) case.



The Signal communication was asuredly leaked and sent to the Atlantic by an inside democrat mole, then the Atlantic published it to embarrass Hegseth, and even though another guy (Waltz) already has taken responsibility for the error, this is all about trying to get Hegseth to resign.

Both of these incidents are being manufactured by the democrats trying to obstruct Trump's administration again.

I explain it as incompetent cabinet appointments.

 

[1srelluc]

Blah, tempest in a teapot.

 

[Dragonlady]

MAGAnauts are the biggest bunch of snowflakes!

They truly are. Everyone is out to "get" their hero. Nobody likes him. All the judges are haters.

 

[SeaMajor7]

Yay,, more Soviet LAWFARE and sabbatoge.

 

[citygator]

It is random, by rotation, unless one judge's workload is particularly heavy then it can be handed off to another generally. So it is highly unusual for Boasberg to get both cases, especially considering that he was off and not even supposed to be there the day he took the first (deportation) case.



The Signal communication was asuredly leaked and sent to the Atlantic by an inside democrat mole, then the Atlantic published it to embarrass Hegseth, and even though another guy (Waltz) already has taken responsibility for the error, this is all about trying to get Hegseth to resign.

Both of these incidents are being manufactured by the democrats trying to obstruct Trump's administration again.

They SHOULDNT HAVE BEEN USING SIGNAL... then there would be no way for them to fuck this up.. or be "tricked" by a journalist. Fuck. If they cant outsmart a journalist how are they keeping secrets safe from real ass spies???????????????????????

 

[SeaMajor7]

They SHOULDNT HAVE BEEN USING SIGNAL... then there would be no way for them to fuck this up.. or be "tricked" by a journalist. Fuck. If they cant outsmart a journalist how are they keeping secrets safe from real ass spies???????????????????????

Biden's CIA and Pentagon APPROVED USING SIGNAL!!!!!
You can cram your NARRATIVE right up your ASS.

 

[kyzr]

Republicans need to enforce rules to prevent "judge shopping".

The deportation case should have been filed in TX, not w/Boasberg.

Defund districts that take cases out of their districts, or who issue nationwide rulings.

 

[d0gbreath]

 

[toobfreak]

They SHOULDNT HAVE BEEN USING SIGNAL...

Signal is a common app used on all government phones.
The transmission carried no actionable information as to who the target was or where the attack was coming from, so, a moot point.
What shouldn't have happened is an inside democrat mole shouldn't have deliberately leaked the communiqué out to the Atlantic as a deliberate effort to try to embarrass the Trump Administration in the hopes of getting Hegseth to resign because he is doing too good of a job.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

Question: Does anyone know exactly how the court system determines which judge to assign to a specific case? It would be interesting to know if they use some sort of randomly generated assignment system or if it's just Trump's "bad luck" catching up to him.

While everyone of course is entitled to their own opinion, if anyone has actual information on how they go about this, I'd love to hear what insight you have.

MSN

President Donald Trump's MAGA base has expressed skepticism after U.S. District Judge James Boasberg—who presided over the migrant deportation case—was also assigned to a new lawsuit involving high-ranking Cabinet officials' messaging of military activity via the Signal app.​

​

​

Newsweek reached out to the Department of Justice (DOJ) via online form Wednesday for comment.​

​

Why It Matters​

Boasberg has been at the center of MAGA fury this month as he has presided over the case involving the Trump administration's speedy deportation of migrants through his invocation of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798.​

​

The act is a wartime law that grants the commander in chief authority to detain or deport non-citizens. The implementation was blocked in federal court and has thus sparked a contentious legal back-and-forth with Boasberg, a chief judge.​

​

The Trump administration this week also faced intense scrutiny after a report in The Atlantic by editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg said he was added to a thread on the encrypted app Signal that included Cabinet officials discussing military action against the Iran-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen.​

​

What To Know​

In the wake of the Signal scandal, the administration was hit with a lawsuit on Tuesday by nonpartisan watchdog group American Oversight.​

​

The lawsuit accuses Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and others of defying the Administrative Procedure Act and the Federal Records Act. The case was assigned to Boasberg on Wednesday in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.​

​

Reports of Boasberg's new assignment sparked MAGA reaction across social media.​

​

​

President Donald Trump is seen alongside U.S. National Security Adviser Michael Waltz, U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance, and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, listening to a question from a reporter during a meeting in the Oval Office of the White House on March 13, 2025, in Washington, D.C. (Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)​

What People Are Saying​

Republican Representative Jim Jordan of Ohio on Tuesday, on Benny Johnson's podcast The Benny Show: "You're right it's supposed to be random," Jordan said responding to Johnson. "Supposed to be random, but Judge Boasberg could recuse himself from this case ... if there's a preceded bias, a potential for bias, if there's a conflict."​

​

​

Jordan continued: "Well I think there's a lot of people who think there's a bias. After all, as you mentioned Benny, this is the guy who said, 'turn the flight around, bring all the bad guys, the hardened criminals who were here illegally who did terrible things, bring those folks back to America.' This is the judge who was there on the FISA [Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act] court when they issued the warrants to spy on President Trump's campaign eight years ago. So, there's a history there and yet no, no recusal, he's going to get the case."​

​

Jordan went on the blast attorney and CNN analyst Norm Eisen, who regularly bashes Trump, adding: "They had that lawsuit ready to go, go figure."​

​

Trump ally Mike Davis on X, formerly Twitter, on Wednesday: "Dear House Judiciary Chairman @Jim_Jordan: Order Chief DC Obama Judge Jeb Boasberg to come explain his court's 'random' assignment of cases."​

​

​

Activist and author Jack Posobiec on X, on Wednesday, reacting to Boasberg's new assignment: "Heavy artillery moving into position. The Op is on"​

​

Conservative influencer Nick Sotor on X, on Wednesday: " WTF?! Judge Boasberg, the activist judge BLOCKING Trump from deporting violent gang members, intentionally DELAYED the release of Hillary Clinton's emails until after the 2016 election He's also now 'coincidentally' presiding over the Signal case This is RIGGED! How do people not see that?"​

​

What Happens Next​

The administration's appeal in the deportation case was rejected on Wednesday afternoon in a ruling of 2-1.​

All you need to know is democrats appoint leftist judges to do their bidding regardless of the law. The ninth circus in California was the start of it all.

 

[citygator]

Signal is a common app used on all government phones.
The transmission carried no actionable information as to who the target was or where the attack was coming from, so, a moot point.
What shouldn't have happened is an inside democrat mole shouldn't have deliberately leaked the communiqué out to the Atlantic as a deliberate effort to try to embarrass the Trump Administration in the hopes of getting Hegseth to resign because he is doing too good of a job.

NO IT IS NOT.

Signal is not approved by the DoD

The Pentagon's internal watchdog criticized a former official's use of the Signal app in 2021, calling it a breach of the department's "records retention policies" and an unauthorized means of communicating sensitive information.

The report, which focused on Brett Goldstein, a former director of the Defense Digital Service, found that Goldstein violated department policies by using Signal "to discuss official DoD information" and encouraging subordinates to communicate with him on the encrypted messaging app.

"Signal is not approved by the DoD as an authorized electronic messaging and voice-calling application," the report asserted, adding that "the use of Signal to discuss official DoD information does not comply with Freedom of Information Act requirements and DoD's records retention policies."

 

[toobfreak]

NO IT IS NOT.

Fool, your own article begins by admitting that Signal has been an app used by them for years. It is on all their stuff.

The problem is not Signal, it is the leaking of the communication by an inside mole to the Atlantic to be used to try to embarrass the Administration into forcing Hegseth to resign.

No one is buying it. Your mole has been identified. His ass is grass.

 

[Dragonlady]

Biden's CIA and Pentagon APPROVED USING SIGNAL!!!!!
You can cram your NARRATIVE right up your ASS.

They didn’t approve its use for classified information, you idiot.

 

[DonGlock26]

Question: Does anyone know exactly how the court system determines which judge to assign to a specific case? It would be interesting to know if they use some sort of randomly generated assignment system or if it's just Trump's "bad luck" catching up to him.

While everyone of course is entitled to their own opinion, if anyone has actual information on how they go about this, I'd love to hear what insight you have.

MSN

President Donald Trump's MAGA base has expressed skepticism after U.S. District Judge James Boasberg—who presided over the migrant deportation case—was also assigned to a new lawsuit involving high-ranking Cabinet officials' messaging of military activity via the Signal app.​

​

​

Newsweek reached out to the Department of Justice (DOJ) via online form Wednesday for comment.​

​

Why It Matters​

Boasberg has been at the center of MAGA fury this month as he has presided over the case involving the Trump administration's speedy deportation of migrants through his invocation of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798.​

​

The act is a wartime law that grants the commander in chief authority to detain or deport non-citizens. The implementation was blocked in federal court and has thus sparked a contentious legal back-and-forth with Boasberg, a chief judge.​

​

The Trump administration this week also faced intense scrutiny after a report in The Atlantic by editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg said he was added to a thread on the encrypted app Signal that included Cabinet officials discussing military action against the Iran-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen.​

​

What To Know​

In the wake of the Signal scandal, the administration was hit with a lawsuit on Tuesday by nonpartisan watchdog group American Oversight.​

​

The lawsuit accuses Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and others of defying the Administrative Procedure Act and the Federal Records Act. The case was assigned to Boasberg on Wednesday in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.​

​

Reports of Boasberg's new assignment sparked MAGA reaction across social media.​

​

​

President Donald Trump is seen alongside U.S. National Security Adviser Michael Waltz, U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance, and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, listening to a question from a reporter during a meeting in the Oval Office of the White House on March 13, 2025, in Washington, D.C. (Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)​

What People Are Saying​

Republican Representative Jim Jordan of Ohio on Tuesday, on Benny Johnson's podcast The Benny Show: "You're right it's supposed to be random," Jordan said responding to Johnson. "Supposed to be random, but Judge Boasberg could recuse himself from this case ... if there's a preceded bias, a potential for bias, if there's a conflict."​

​

​

Jordan continued: "Well I think there's a lot of people who think there's a bias. After all, as you mentioned Benny, this is the guy who said, 'turn the flight around, bring all the bad guys, the hardened criminals who were here illegally who did terrible things, bring those folks back to America.' This is the judge who was there on the FISA [Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act] court when they issued the warrants to spy on President Trump's campaign eight years ago. So, there's a history there and yet no, no recusal, he's going to get the case."​

​

Jordan went on the blast attorney and CNN analyst Norm Eisen, who regularly bashes Trump, adding: "They had that lawsuit ready to go, go figure."​

​

Trump ally Mike Davis on X, formerly Twitter, on Wednesday: "Dear House Judiciary Chairman @Jim_Jordan: Order Chief DC Obama Judge Jeb Boasberg to come explain his court's 'random' assignment of cases."​

​

​

Activist and author Jack Posobiec on X, on Wednesday, reacting to Boasberg's new assignment: "Heavy artillery moving into position. The Op is on"​

​

Conservative influencer Nick Sotor on X, on Wednesday: " WTF?! Judge Boasberg, the activist judge BLOCKING Trump from deporting violent gang members, intentionally DELAYED the release of Hillary Clinton's emails until after the 2016 election He's also now 'coincidentally' presiding over the Signal case This is RIGGED! How do people not see that?"​

​

What Happens Next​

The administration's appeal in the deportation case was rejected on Wednesday afternoon in a ruling of 2-1.​

 

[SeaMajor7]

They didn’t approve its use for classified information, you idiot.

Nothing classified involved, hoser.

 

[Dragonlady]

Nothing classified involved, hoser.

Keep parroting the lies, SeaSlug. It’s all you have.