Oddball
Unobtanium Member
Well, if you read it in the Nation's Comic Book, it must be true!! 

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yet ... these ten "warmest years" during the last 50 years fits fine in the 100 year cycle but comes nowhere near the warmest in the last million years ... and in no way comparable to the last billion year records ... strange huh? Post that chart you had with the sine wave of records again ... dare you.
Sorry, but since we can pick and choose which science we use and what we can ignore, and which scientists we trust ... I choose ... Midnight's scientists. All of those who say global warming is human made are full of shit, every single one of them, and their science doesn't exist.
And that's what the debate seems to be boiling down to. Republicans have "chosen" a reality. Once they decide "This is the truth", there is no evidence they will ever accept.
Take Iraq for instance. Bush has publicly stated that "No one in our administration has ever linked Saddam to 9/11". You can watch him say it on Youtube. Yet, we invaded Iraq because the majority of the American people believed that Saddam had ties to al Qaeda and Bin Laden. Not because of WMDs. Remember North Korea has WMDs and they are on the end of missiles, yet we didn't invade them. Where did they get that idea about Saddam? Even today, the majority of Republicans still believe that Saddam had ties to 9/11, even after Bush publicly said no.
Once a Republican believes something, nothing will change that belief. These are people that believe Noah's Ark is a true historical event. They "pick and choose" information.
You see, in science, data and evidence is looked at and a hypothesis is created that fits the data and evidence. If the data and evidence change, the hypothesis changes. Republicans take this for scientists not being able to make up their minds.
Noah's Ark is a perfect example of Republican thinking. First, they believe it's a "true" story. Any evidence they think they find that confirms it, they latch onto, like the Grand Canyon. Then when evidence is presented that proves the Grand Canyon is hundreds of millions of years old and fossils found at the bottom are simple and become complex as you move upward through the layers of earth, that evidence is discarded. So, the existence of the Grand Canyon is "proof" of Noah's Ark, but the other evidence just "made up".
Do I have up summed up correctly? Where does my hypothesis fail?
It's based on bigotry and assumption.
I just exhaled a little CO2, you think I should of trapped it in a bag made from petroleum and hid it in the bottom of a dark closet.
environuts are the biggest polluters on earth, they actually produce more things they think will save them, like solar power, yep, making solar makes C02, they did not have to make a solar panel, they already have a source for power, so the environuts make pollution that they could of avoided, that they did not need, and they say we are the problem
environuts
Well, if you read it in the Nation's Comic Book, it must be true!!![]()