JakeStarkey
Diamond Member
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,522
- 2,165
- Banned
- #101
You're failing junior. ok I guess I'll have to talk down to you.
If the states were not considered individual sovereign nations why did they have state Constitutions? After all with the U.S. Constitution and it being the law of the law there would not be any need for another Constitution? Right?
They would have suspend the state Constitution wouldn't they have?
Of course they would have kept the state governments to maintain the everyday busniess of the states, but to have a state constitution seems kind of a waste wouldn't you agree?
You plan to do this again? Ask the same question over and over after it has already been answered? I note your pattern of turning to obvious trolling when you've run out of things to say.
OK since you have failed at proving your point and refuse to answer this question you just concede defeat.
If you can't answer the question just say you can't. Or even better stop making these knee jerk reaction threads if you can't handle those tough questions.
Only you fail to understand national and state constitutions and their roles in a federal government.