Looks like Sterling is throwing in the towel

DigitalDrifter

Diamond Member
Feb 22, 2013
47,553
25,864
2,605
Oregon
Damn, I was hoping this would drag out a couple years in the courts.


Reports: Donald Sterling agrees to allow wife Shelly Sterling to sell the Los Angeles Clippers


[QUOTE Banned-for-life*Los Angeles Clippers*owner Donald Sterling has reportedly agreed to cede control of the organization to his wife, Rochelle "Shelly" Sterling, to negotiate with the NBA on a sale of the franchise that could be worth billions, and that would bring the disgraced Sterling's time as the NBA's longest-tenured owner to a long-awaited end.

TMZ Sports first reported*Friday morning that Sterling had "just surrendered control" to Shelly, his wife of 58 years, and that she "is now secretly negotiating with the NBA to sell the team:

Our sources say Shelly and her lawyer, Pierce O'Donnell, have been secretly meeting with NBA Commissioner Adam Silver and NBA lawyers to "resolve the dispute amicably." We're told Shelly realizes the NBA wants the team sold, but she has significantly more leverage and credibility with the league than Donald. Her end game is simple -- she won't object to the sale, but SHE wants to call the shots.

ESPN's Ramona Shelburne*followed up with a report that confirms the main point — Donald's allowing Shelly to take the reins in working out a deal — but still refers to any prospective agreement as a*"forced sale"*and notes that, since the*NBA would have to sign off*on Shelly acting as the focal point for decision-making and negotiations, this development likely wouldn't result in Shelly "calling the shots," per se:

Shelly Sterling and her lawyers have been negotiating with the NBA since her husband was banned for life by commissioner Adam Silver on April 29. While the league has yet to formally accept this arrangement, sources said, if she is willing to sell the team in its entirety, this could bring a startlingly quick end to what appeared to be a protracted legal battle.

While Sterling's*history*of*problematic*racial*attitudes*and*actions*has long since been established, this particular saga began nearly a month ago, when*audio*recordings*featuring the longtime Clippers owner chastising former assistant/alleged girlfriend*V. Stiviano*for “associating” with minorities, "promoting" said associations by posting pictures she'd taken with black people on her Instagram account, and potentially bringing African-Americans — most notably Magic Johnson — to Clippers home games, among other things — were published online.

After an investigation into the recordings confirmed that it was indeed Sterling making those racist remarks, NBA Commissioner Adam Silverbanned Sterling for life, fined him $2.5 million and announced that the league would invoke a clause in the league's*constitution*to begin the process of*terminating his ownership*of the Clippers franchise he purchased in 1981 and*forcing its sale*to an outside buyer.

Shortly before the ban came down, Sterling told Jim Gray that*he did not intend to sell the Clippers. As the controversy surrounding the Clippers continued to swirl over the weeks that followed, Shelly Sterling made it clear that she*intended to fight*to maintain her*50 percent ownership stake*in the team through the Sterling Family Trust. Last week, after Donald Sterling had made his first public comments on the matter in a*bizarre and ridiculous interview on CNN, his attorney informed the NBA that*he wouldn't be paying the $2.5 million fine*and threatened to sue the league over its attempts to force him out.

Multiple legal experts claimed that the Sterlings were*unlikely to prevail*if this matter ever got to a courtroom, but considering the*Sterlings' love of litigation, it seemed like that's where we were headed all the same.*Evidently, that changed this week.

The Advisory/Finance Committee of the league's Board of Governors initiated a formal charge to*terminate the Sterlings' ownership on Monday, asserting "that Mr. Sterling engaged in conduct that has damaged and continues to damage the NBA and its teams" and that his "actions and positions significantly undermine the NBA's efforts to promote diversity and inclusion; damage the NBA's relationship with its fans; harm NBA owners, players and Clippers team personnel; and impair the NBA's relationship with marketing and merchandising partners, as well as with government and community leaders." The filing of the charge set June 3 as the date for a vote among the NBA's owners on whether to dismiss Sterling, with Sterling having until May 27 to offer a formal response to the charges against him.

The termination charge also accuses the Sterlings and*since-jettisoned*Clippers president Andy Roeser of "destroying evidence relating to the recording, providing false and misleading information to [Chief NBA Investigator David] Anders in connection with the commissioner's investigation of the recording and issuing a false and misleading public statement on April 26 regarding the authenticity of the TMZ recording." It further claims that*Sterling approached Stiviano and asked her to lie about the recordings, and that the Sterlings are not estranged, as has been suggested multiple times, but rather are "inextricably intertwined" when it comes to their dealings with the franchise.

The Los Angeles Times reported*additional details about the NBA's case against Sterling on Friday, indicating that the Clippers were aware of the recordings a full two weeks before TMZ published them, and that Stiviano initially sent them in response to blowback she was receiving as part of*Shelly Sterling's lawsuit against her:

In early April, though, [Donald Sterling and Stiviano's] relationship became strained. Sterling's wife, Shelly, had sued Stiviano in March, charging that the 31-year-old had extracted four luxury cars, $240,000 in cash and the $1.8-million house from her 80-year-old husband.Shelly Sterling also put a lien on the house that her husband had given Stiviano. Six days later, on April 9, Stiviano got a text from a Clippers employee: Donald Sterling had ordered the tickets, parking pass and luxury suite access he had given her for that night's game to be sold.Stiviano texted that it didn't matter — another regular had given her tickets. The employee texted back: "Mr. Sterling said to let me know if you need anything. We don't want to have any issues at the game."Stiviano responded: "No tell Mr. Sterling that I don't need anything nor do I want anything…But thanks for asking. LET THE GAMES BEGAN. . . ."Two minutes later, Stiviano sent the employee an audio file. In it, Sterling could be heard making disparaging remarks about Magic Johnson, blacks and other minorities, and how he didn't want Stiviano associating with them publicly.

The Times' story details how the NBA's charge lays out the actions the Sterlings and Roeser took to "make the problem go away," which included Roeser rebuffing a Clippers spokesman's suggestion that the team inform the NBA about the recording early in the process and Roeser instructing a team employee to delete the audio file and all other associated texts on the matter. The NBA investigation also claims that Sterling went to Stiviano on May 2 and told her to "falsely state to the NBA that the voice on the recording was not Mr. Sterling's," saying that he could make Shelly's lawsuit disappear if Stiviano would "pay the full value of the claim," with Sterling to reimburse her later "through back channels."

As the week unfolded and the details of the NBA's case continued to come out, "Sterling has rethought his position" on entrenching for a fight, preferring to allow Shelly — an alternate governor of the team under the league's constitution — to work on the sale, according to*ESPN's Shelburne:

NBA rules, however, prevent him from transferring a controlling interest in the team to anyone. A new controlling owner would need to be approved by the board of governors, and Shelly Sterling would not be approved.It is not known whether Shelly Sterling intends to sell the team in its entirety, but that is the only way the NBA would accept the terms of this agreement between Donald Sterling and his wife, sources said.While Shelly Sterling's lawyers have made it clear to the league that she intends to maintain her 50 percent interest in the team, they have also stated both publicly and privately that she would like to resolve the situation amicably.

How much control Shelly Sterling would have, clearly, remains to be seen. One thing's for sure, though — if and when the Clippers do go on the block, there will be*no*shortage*of*bidders. As a result, the sale price is likely to be astronomical, with some estimates pegging the valuation as high as between $1 billion and $2 billion.

Given how Sterling's entire 30-year tenure as the Clippers' owner has unfolded, and the eons' worth of insanity that has come down the pike in the last month, you'll forgive me for being skeptical that this will all proceed smoothly and simply, and that the transition in ownership will be quick and painless. For now, though, Donald Sterling appears to have given up the ghost of fighting to hold onto his franchise; among all the unbelievable things about this sordid story, that, oddly, might be the most stunning.

][/QUOTE]

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nba-b...-sell-the-los-angeles-clippers-160732372.html
 
Where are all the dime store attorneys predicting a protracted legal battle. :lol:

Sterling sees the writing on the wall.

We were basing it on his statements that he would fight this.

Either he is getting an offer that is blowing his socks off, or someone has some dirt on him that's even worse than the dirt that's out there.

In any event this may prevent the board of governors from voting on kicking him, which is something the desperately want to avoid.
 
Where are all the dime store attorneys predicting a protracted legal battle. :lol:

Sterling sees the writing on the wall.

We were basing it on his statements that he would fight this.

Either he is getting an offer that is blowing his socks off, or someone has some dirt on him that's even worse than the dirt that's out there.

In any event this may prevent the board of governors from voting on kicking him, which is something the desperately want to avoid.

I doubt its going to prevent anything. Its simply a vote and a secret one at that. I dont think he can stall them for longer than a week.
 
Where are all the dime store attorneys predicting a protracted legal battle. :lol:

Sterling sees the writing on the wall.

We were basing it on his statements that he would fight this.

Either he is getting an offer that is blowing his socks off, or someone has some dirt on him that's even worse than the dirt that's out there.

In any event this may prevent the board of governors from voting on kicking him, which is something the desperately want to avoid.

It probably all has to do with his age. More than likely ten or more years ago, he would have stayed and fought.
 
Damn, I was hoping this would drag out a couple years in the courts.

why?

Because both sides deserve each other, Sterling for being an asshole, and the NBA for crucifying someone over words while allowing other employees to get away with all sorts of crap. The only way it would be more poetic is if it was the NFL getting in trouble instead of the NBA.
 
Just talked to my attorney and he said this could very well be a stalling tactic.

If you were to get divorced, you can't just sell the home without a court because it belongs to both parties and just because the NBA has an agreement, I don't think they have an agreement with Mrs. Sterling and it is joint property.

If I didn't know my wife has extra undeclared income, the I.R.S. just can't come in and take my home. I'm protected.

She has rights. She didn't sign her rights away when Mr. Sterling signed a deal with the NBA. They can't just come take it.

I'm not sure the agreement is legal because of this. There are at least two lawyers on this board. Get their opinion.
 
Just talked to my attorney and he said this could very well be a stalling tactic.

If you were to get divorced, you can't just sell the home without a court because it belongs to both parties and just because the NBA has an agreement, I don't think they have an agreement with Mrs. Sterling and it is joint property.

If I didn't know my wife has extra undeclared income, the I.R.S. just can't come in and take my home. I'm protected.

She has rights. She didn't sign her rights away when Mr. Sterling signed a deal with the NBA. They can't just come take it.

I'm not sure the agreement is legal because of this. There are at least two lawyers on this board. Get their opinion.

The team is owned by a trust. The NBA is taking the team from the trust not the wife or Sterling.
 
Just talked to my attorney and he said this could very well be a stalling tactic.

If you were to get divorced, you can't just sell the home without a court because it belongs to both parties and just because the NBA has an agreement, I don't think they have an agreement with Mrs. Sterling and it is joint property.

If I didn't know my wife has extra undeclared income, the I.R.S. just can't come in and take my home. I'm protected.

She has rights. She didn't sign her rights away when Mr. Sterling signed a deal with the NBA. They can't just come take it.

I'm not sure the agreement is legal because of this. There are at least two lawyers on this board. Get their opinion.

The team is owned by a trust. The NBA is taking the team from the trust not the wife or Sterling.

The wife and Sterling are the owners, no matter what the NBA does. If the NBA does not get the best price possible Sterling can sue for denial of his property rights to his business.
 
The guy is in his 80s.

If you were him, would you rather enjoy your remaining years spending your billions or sitting with lawyers combating a bunch of lawsuits?
 
If you were to get divorced, you can't just sell the home without a court because it belongs to both parties and just because the NBA has an agreement, I don't think they have an agreement with Mrs. Sterling and it is joint property.

If I didn't know my wife has extra undeclared income, the I.R.S. just can't come in and take my home. I'm protected.

She has rights. She didn't sign her rights away when Mr. Sterling signed a deal with the NBA. They can't just come take it.

I'm not sure the agreement is legal because of this. There are at least two lawyers on this board. Get their opinion.

The team is owned by a trust. The NBA is taking the team from the trust not the wife or Sterling.

The wife and Sterling are the owners, no matter what the NBA does. If the NBA does not get the best price possible Sterling can sue for denial of his property rights to his business.

No. The trust is the owner. Thats what trusts do. They take ownership of the asset.
 
The team is owned by a trust. The NBA is taking the team from the trust not the wife or Sterling.

The wife and Sterling are the owners, no matter what the NBA does. If the NBA does not get the best price possible Sterling can sue for denial of his property rights to his business.

No. The trust is the owner. Thats what trusts do. They take ownership of the asset.

So I can declare your house a "trust" and then take it over?
 
Well that didn't last long:

NBA will still force sale of L.A. Clippers, rebuffs Sterlings' offer - CNN.com

The NBA will proceed with a vote to force a sale of the Los Angeles Clippers, rebuffing an effort by co-owners Donald and Shelly Sterling to sell the franchise voluntarily, NBA spokesman Mike Bass said Friday.
"We continue to follow the process set forth in the NBA Constitution regarding termination of the current ownership interests in the Los Angeles Clippers and are proceeding toward a hearing on this matter on June 3," Bass said.
His announcement followed reports earlier Friday about how Donald and Shelly Sterling agreed to a voluntary sale of the NBA franchise as the league prepares a vote on a forced sale, according to a source familiar with the situation.
The couple have an agreement to allow Shelly Sterling to do the negotiations, and there have already been discussions between her and the NBA, according to the source.
 
He was party to a contractual business group...the NBA owners. He must comply and sell.
 
I'm still wondering when that deformed subhuman **** is going to be charged for releasing private conversations.
 

Forum List

Back
Top