Looks Like Pelosi Wanted the January 6 Riot to Occur, Refused All Requests to Use NG Troops to Guard Capitol

[mikegriffith1]

Well, well, isn't this interesting: It turns out that at least four days before January 6, TRUMP authorized the use of 20,000 National Guard (NG) troops to protect the Capitol but that Nancy Pelosi refused every request to use the troops even when the capitol police leadership requested the troops.

John Solomon broke this blockbuster story this morning on Just the News. Tonight on Hannity he will discuss another newly obtained document that shows that Sen. Schumer's staff received FBI intel that some of the protestors would storm the Capitol but failed to act on it.

Trump Pentagon first offered National Guard to Capitol four days before Jan. 6 riots, memo shows

Official Capitol Police timeline validates Trump administration's account, shows Democrats' fateful rejections of offers. "Seems absolutely illogical," one official wrote about security posture hours before riot began.

justthenews.com

She had no problem having NG troops guard the Capitol for weeks after the riot, even though there was no credible threat of trouble, but her supposed excuse for refusing requests to use NG troops was that it would be "bad optics." "Bad optics"? Ensuring the safety of the Capitol would be "bad optics"? Why wasn't it "bad optics" to keep NG troops around the Capitol for weeks after the riot when there was clearly no need for them?

 

[surada]

Well, well, isn't this interesting: It turns out that at least four days before January 6, TRUMP authorized the use of 20,000 National Guard (NG) troops to protect the Capitol but that Nancy Pelosi refused every request to use the troops even when the capitol police leadership requested the troops.

John Solomon broke this blockbuster story this morning on Just the News. Tonight on Hannity he will discuss another newly obtained document that shows that Sen. Schumer's staff received FBI intel that some of the protestors would storm the Capitol but failed to act on it.

Trump Pentagon first offered National Guard to Capitol four days before Jan. 6 riots, memo shows

Official Capitol Police timeline validates Trump administration's account, shows Democrats' fateful rejections of offers. "Seems absolutely illogical," one official wrote about security posture hours before riot began.

justthenews.com

She had no problem having NG troops guard the Capitol for weeks after the riot, even though there was no credible threat of trouble, but her supposed excuse for refusing requests to use NG troops was that it would be "bad optics." "Bad optics"? Ensuring the safety of the Capitol would be "bad optics"? Why wasn't it "bad optics" to keep NG troops around the Capitol for weeks after the riot when there was clearly no need for them?

Turns out this is a lie.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

Yet you made a thread about it mostly being Trumps fault.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!

 

[iamwhatiseem]

 

[Billy_Bob]

Well, well, isn't this interesting: It turns out that at least four days before January 6, TRUMP authorized the use of 20,000 National Guard (NG) troops to protect the Capitol but that Nancy Pelosi refused every request to use the troops even when the capitol police leadership requested the troops.

John Solomon broke this blockbuster story this morning on Just the News. Tonight on Hannity he will discuss another newly obtained document that shows that Sen. Schumer's staff received FBI intel that some of the protestors would storm the Capitol but failed to act on it.

Trump Pentagon first offered National Guard to Capitol four days before Jan. 6 riots, memo shows

Official Capitol Police timeline validates Trump administration's account, shows Democrats' fateful rejections of offers. "Seems absolutely illogical," one official wrote about security posture hours before riot began.

justthenews.com

She had no problem having NG troops guard the Capitol for weeks after the riot, even though there was no credible threat of trouble, but her supposed excuse for refusing requests to use NG troops was that it would be "bad optics." "Bad optics"? Ensuring the safety of the Capitol would be "bad optics"? Why wasn't it "bad optics" to keep NG troops around the Capitol for weeks after the riot when there was clearly no need for them?

Its even worse than that. Chuck Schumer's staff members denied the CHP access to the FBI briefing data making it impossible for them to prepare.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Turns out this is a lie.

I don't know where you're getting your false information, but this is well documented. The only liar is you.

 

[scruffy]

Yep.

The DEMOCRATS "allow" this stuff to happen.

But sometimes they go too far, and they do more than just "allow".

Sometimes they actually foment and support.

We have them nailed on the BLM riots. There are financial records. Just wait.

 

[Lesh]

A. Pelosi has no power to reject NG troops

B. No proof tat any request was made to anyone beyond Chris Miller...Trump's Sec Defense...who treated it as an offhand remark

C. Schumer was NOT Majority Leader of the Senate at that time

 

[Oddball]

Looks Like Pelosi Wanted the January 6 Riot to Occur​

 

[Oddball]

A. Pelosi has no power to reject NG troops

But had the power to call them up, and turn all of the District of Criminals into a dystopian armed camp for several weeks.

 

[Billy_Bob]

A. Pelosi has no power to reject NG troops

B. No proof tat any request was made to anyone beyond Chris Miller...Trump's Sec Defense...who treated it as an offhand remark

C. Schumer was NOT Majority Leader of the Senate at that time

You want to tell me whom does the House Sergeant at Arms report to? NANCY PELOSI... Your bull shit has been debunked. The words your looking for are CHAIN OF COMMAND. Epic Failure

 

[Billy_Bob]

But had the power to call them up, and turn all of the District of Criminals into a dystopian armed camp for several weeks.

Funny how they ignore that she did that... Its like they look through bull shit goggles...
This is probably why one month ago people thought Trump actually had some roll (58%) and today, after the dog and pony show, that number has dropped to just 44%.. They have lost the messaging battle and they are desperate. Now Schiff is embroiled in breaching Capitol Hill Security... its going to go much lower.

 

[Lesh]

You want to tell me whom does the House Sergeant at Arms report to? NANCY PELOSI... Your bull shit has been debunked. The words your looking for are CHAIN OF COMMAND. Epic Failure

The House SAO reports to the Capitol Police BOARD ya idiot

The Senate SAO does as well...

 

[Lesh]

Looks Like Pelosi Wanted the January 6 Riot to Occur​

View attachment 660372

Yea...she's suicidal and wanted Trump to retain the Presidency.

Sure. That makes sense

 

[Oddball]

Yea...she's suicidal and wanted Trump to retain the Presidency.

Sure. That makes sense

 

[Billy_Bob]

The House SAO reports to the Capitol Police BOARD ya idiot

The Senate SAO does as well...

Wrong... The house SAA and senate SAA along with Miriam Bowser (DC mayor) is the BOARD. YOU ARE REALLY HAVING A HARD TIME WITH THIS..

The CHAIN OF COMMAND is; Police chief --> The Board (House SAA, Senate SAA, Miriam Bowser) --> Nancy Pelosi --> POTUS.

The request goes to the board, IT is then taken from the board by the House SAA to Pelosi who must make the request to POTUS. Everything stopped with Pelosi. At a minimum 6 times that are documented.

 

[Lesh]

Wrong... The house SAA and senate SAA along with Miriam Bowser (DC mayor) is the BOARD. YOU ARE REALLY HAVING A HARD TIME WITH THIS..

The CHAIN OF COMMAND is; Police chief --> The Board (House SAA, Senate SAA, Miriam Bowser) --> Nancy Pelosi --> POTUS.

The request goes to the board, IT is then taken from the board by the House SAA to Pelosi who must make the request to POTUS. Everything stopped with Pelosi. At a minimum 6 times that are documented.

Wrong

Four congressional committees have statutory oversight.[6] The authority of the Police Chief is, in many ways, restrained. The Capitol Police chief reports to the Capitol Police Board, a three-person group composed of the Senate and House Sergeants at Arms and the Architect of the Capitol.[7]

 

[Billy_Bob]

Wrong

Four congressional committees have statutory oversight.[6] The authority of the Police Chief is, in many ways, restrained. The Capitol Police chief reports to the Capitol Police Board, a three-person group composed of the Senate and House Sergeants at Arms and the Architect of the Capitol.[7]

Too dam funny. You just destroyed your own premise... So if it is not Miriam (which I still contend this was changed) the chain of command remains. The congressional committees do not control the day to day operations, That responsibility is Pelosi's. I suggest you read your own link...

 

[Lesh]

The congressional committees do not control the day to day operations,

Exactly. The Capitol Chief of Police does and he reports to the Board.

That responsibility is Pelosi's.

You read the link. Pelosi is not mentioned and neither is McConnell (Senate Majority Leader at that time)

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

A. Pelosi has no power to reject NG troops

B. No proof tat any request was made to anyone beyond Chris Miller...Trump's Sec Defense...who treated it as an offhand remark

C. Schumer was NOT Majority Leader of the Senate at that time