Looks like Donald Trump

[eagle7-31]

Victor Davis Hanson - Who denies election results?

jewishworldreview.com

was not the only one questioning election results. Of course the alternate universe Democrats scream nothing else they ignore their own denials back in 2004 among other years.

 

[eagle7-31]

Victor Davis Hanson - Who denies election results?

jewishworldreview.com

was not the only one questioning election results. Of course the alternate universe Democrats scream nothing else they ignore their own denials back in 2004 among other years.

[IMG alt="Who denies election results?

"]https://jewishworldreview.com//op-art/election_sick_of.jpg?ref=relatedBox[/IMG]
A Democratic myth has arisen that former President Donald Trump's denial of the accuracy of the 2020 vote was "unprecedented."


Unfortunately, the history of U.S. elections is often a story of both legitimate and illegitimate election denialism.

The 1800, 1824, 1876, and 1960 elections were all understandably questioned. In some of these cases, a partisan House of Representatives decided the winner.

Presidential candidate Al Gore in 2000 did not accept the popular vote results in Florida. He spent five weeks futilely contesting the state's tally — until recounts and the Supreme Court certified it.

The ensuing charge that former President George W. Bush was "selected not elected" was the Democrats' denialist mantra for years.

In 2004, Senator Barbara Boxer, D-Calif. and 31 Democratic House members voted not to certify the Ohio election results in their unhinged efforts to overturn the election. Those denialists included the current sanctimonious chairman of the January 6 select committee, U.S. Representative Benny Thompson, D-Miss.

After 2016, crackpot Democratic orthodoxy for years insisted that Trump had "colluded" with Russia to "steal" certain victory from Hillary Clinton.

Clinton herself claimed that Trump was not a "legitimate" president. No wonder she loudly joined #TheResistance to obstruct his presidency.



ENJOY THIS ESSAYIST? Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.


The serial denialist Clinton later urged Joe Biden not to concede the 2020 election if he lost.

Also after 2016, left-wing third-party candidate and denialist Jill Stein vainly sued in courts to disqualify voting machine results in preselected states.

A denialist host of Hollywood C-list actors in 2016 cut television commercials begging members of the Electoral College to violate their oaths and instead flip the election to Hillary Clinton.

Clinton herself had hired foreign national Christopher Steele to concoct a dossier of untruths to smear her 2016 campaign opponent, Trump.

The FBI took up Clinton's failed efforts. It likewise paid in vain her ancillaries like Christopher Steele to "verify" the dossier's lies.

The bureau further misled a FISA court about the dossier's authenticity. An FBI lawyer even altered a document, as part of a government effort to disrupt a presidential transition and presidency.

The Clinton-FBI Russian-collusion hoax was a small part of the progressive effort to warp the 2016 election result.

The Washington Post giddily bragged about various groups formed to impeach Trump in his first days in office, on the pretext he was illegitimately elected.

Rosa Brooks, an Obama Administration Pentagon lawyer, less than two weeks after Trump's inauguration wrote a long denialist essay in Foreign Policy outlining a strategy to remove the supposedly illegitimate president. She discussed the options of impeachment, the 25th Amendment — and even a military coup.

When rioting exploded in the streets of Washington D.C. after the election results became clear, Madonna infamously shouted to a mass crowd that she dreamed of blowing up the White House, presumably with the Trump family in it.

Was that not the most violent form of election denialism?

The election denialist Stacey Abrams became a media heartthrob and left-wing cult hero. Abrams monetized her ridiculous denialism ("voter suppression") by stumping the country from 2018 to 2021 claiming, without evidence, that the 2018 the Georgia gubernatorial election was rigged. In truth, she lost by over 50,000 votes.

Time magazine's Molly Ball in a triumphalist essay bragged that in 2020 a combination of Big Tech money from Silicon Valley — fueled by Mark Zuckerberg's $419 million infusion — absorbed the balloting collection and counting of several key voting precincts weighed to help Biden.

Ball bragged of careful pre-election censoring of the contemporary news by Big Tech. Most notably, that effort spread the lie that the Hunter Biden laptop scandal was "Russian disinformation."

Left-wing interest groups modulated the often-violent Black Lives Matter and Antifa street protests of 2020 in efforts to aid the Biden campaign.

Ball summed up that left-wing election engineering effort as "a conspiracy unfolding behind the scenes" and called it "the secret history of the 2020 election."

So, who exactly were those "secret" warpers of the 2020 election?

As Ball put it: "A well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information."





It is entirely legitimate to question the probity and legality of those systematic left-wing efforts in key states to overturn long-standing voting laws passed by state legislatures.

Then followed an even larger effort to render Election Day a mere construct for the first time in American history. Over 100 million ballots were not cast on Election Day, the vast majority of them (and by design) Biden votes. Somehow customary ballot disqualification rates of mail-in ballots in some states plunged — even as their numbers exploded.

The scariest form of election interference was the 2020 "cabal." The FBI, Silicon Valley, street protesters, and the media all conspired to work for the "right result."

Apparently, that "conspiracy" was the denialists' response to the 2016 victory of Trump that they never accepted.

 

[Baron Von Murderpaws]

The Dems were screaming voter fraud in the 80's as well.
They stated that mail in ballots were easily faked, and needed to be stopped.

There was a really good video of this court proceeding on Youtube, but it's been removed.............of course!

 

[odanny]

I smell……………… desperation.

 

[g5000]

People whine about their losses all the time. However, they do not attempt a coup.

Hillary Clinton conceded the 2016 election the day after Election Day.

She did not put together illegal fake electors.

She did not pressure any secretaries of state to "find" enough votes for her to win.

She did not pressure the Vice President to overturn the election results.

She did not incite an insurrection.


So, yeah. Trump's attempted coup was unprecedented.

 

[eagle7-31]

People whine about their losses all the time. However, they do not attempt a coup.

Hillary Clinton conceded the 2016 election the day after Election Day.

She did not put together illegal fake electors.

She did not pressure any secretaries of state to "find" enough votes for her to win.

She did not pressure the Vice President to overturn the election results.

She did not incite an insurrection.


So, yeah. Trump's attempted coup was unprecedented.

No she just made up a fake Trump/Russian collusion BS for starters.

 

[g5000]

In the history of American politics, probably the only loser who had a legitimate claim to having the presidency stolen from him is Andrew Jackson.

As a result of having the election stolen from him, Jackson formed the Democratic Party!

 

[Thunk]

Democrats scream nothing else they ignore their own denials back in 2004 among other years.

2004???

What about the last 6 years of "Trump stole the election with RUSSIA COLLUSION"?

 

[g5000]

No she just made up a fake Trump/Russian collusion BS for starters.

Putin definitely gave Trump a leg up. Trump did not personally collude, but his campaign staff did. And his son Eric tried to.

 

[lennypartiv]

So, yeah. Trump's attempted coup was unprecedented.

I don't see a problem with Trump wanting the fraudulent votes thrown out.

 

[g5000]

I don't see a problem with Trump wanting the fraudulent votes thrown out.

The problem is that Trump knew there were no fraudulent votes. And he deliberately submitted legal paperwork he knew was fraudulent.

He thought it was as easy to hoax the court as it is to hoax you!

 

[okfine]

I don't see a problem with Trump wanting the fraudulent votes thrown out.

How many did he ask Brad for?

 

[Baron Von Murderpaws]

Desperation is the name of the game the last quarter of 2022, as the NaziKarens attempt every lie, every harassment, every torment, every scheme, every backstabbing scenario........to get whats left of their sheeples to NOT dump their asses for a different political party!

 

[BackAgain]

I smell……………… desperation.

You smell your own bad breath. Go brush.

 

[Baron Von Murderpaws]

You smell your own bad breath. Go brush.

It's difficult for them to brush their teeth, when their lips are glued to Bidens butthole.

 

[Slade3200]

Victor Davis Hanson - Who denies election results?

jewishworldreview.com

was not the only one questioning election results. Of course the alternate universe Democrats scream nothing else they ignore their own denials back in 2004 among other years.

People have always bitched about losing. Common trait of a sore loser. But there has never in our history been a campaign like stop the steal. It is a complete disgrace

 

[Lastamender]

I smell……………… desperation.

No, no you don't.

 

[Slade3200]

No, no you don't.

Finally you are correct. It’s not desperation he is smelling. It is utter failure. Remember time after time our talks ending in you saying “wait and see”…. I’ve waited. There’s nothing to see

 

[Lastamender]

Finally you are correct. It’s not desperation he is smelling. It is utter failure. Remember time after time our talks ending in you saying “wait and see”…. I’ve waited. There’s nothing to see

The whole country smells like failure. Courtesy of Incest Joe.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

It is the truth. When the left wins, the right states it's stolen elections. When the left loses, they claim the same.

So what does all this tell us? It tells us that the public (both right and left) don't trust our voting system. That's why it's best to take a few steps back and get technology out of our voting.

What we need are paper ballots and hand count only. Sure, it may take us a few more days to declare a winner, but what's the rush? If any fraud is suspected, we can always go back and look at the actual ballots where said fraud took place, and then come to a proper determination.

If nobody trusts technology, then it's stupid to keep it around. I don't trust it and that's why I say it's time to get rid of it.